Account Options

  1. Sign in
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Seriously, can we just give up on bipartisanship all ready?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kyle Curtis  
View profile  
 More options Feb 4 2010, 6:44 pm
From: Kyle Curtis <calickiz...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:44:19 -0800
Local: Thurs, Feb 4 2010 6:44 pm
Subject: Seriously, can we just give up on bipartisanship all ready?

Pathetic, real-life exchange between two Congressmen on Capitol Hill, c/o James
Fallows<http://jamesfallows.theatlantic.com/archives/2010/02/why_bipartisansh...>
:

“GOP member: ‘I’d like this in the bill.’

“Dem member response: ‘If we put it in, will you vote for the bill?’

“GOP member: ‘You know I can’t vote for the bill.’

“Dem member: ‘Then why should we put it in the bill?’

And this is why any attempt towards bipartisanship is utterly worthless.

Over the past year, the GOP has proven themselves utterly incapable of
legislating or providing one iota of political leadership. (And, no,
releasing a 32-page health care
bill<http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/bachmann-calls-for-health-...>that
ignores the complexities and refuses to address the systemic nature of
health care reform doesn’t represent “political leadership”- just simply
legislative games.) If they can score political points by ignoring the
struggles Americans face on a daily basis, then that’s the strategy they
will pursue.

Of course, their supporters will state: “The Republicans are the only ones
trying to protect America!” Which begs the question: If this is true, why
isn’t John McCain President, with Mitch McConnell overseeing a 59-seat
majority in the Senate?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »