JSAN Authors Google Group

Salma Hayek Amazing Boobs

2008-09-08T22:23:54Z

Are there two boobs that are more perfect in the universe?
[link]

Shakira On Stage

2008-09-06T04:56:54Z

Lucky for her, she wore panties that day!
[link]

Mandy Moore Photoshoot

2008-09-06T04:56:50Z

She knows how to work the camera!
[link]

Jessica Simpson Wet All Ove

2008-09-06T04:56:48Z

The playful Jessica Simpson showing how she likes to get wet.
[link]

Re: master.openjsan.org status and uploading new modules

2008-04-04T17:35:44Z

Hmmm... It passed 5 months so long. Is JSAN going to die???

--
Ivan

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-02T06:01:49Z

Oh. Right. Duh.
Okay, good.
Thanks,
David

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-02T04:39:36Z

TestResult.js was inside lib/Test/Builder/, and that directory's been
scotched:
Only in Test.Simple.old/lib/Test: Builder
builder_death.js had a difference: one newline:
diff -ru Test.Simple.old/tests/builder_ death.js Test.Simple.new/tests/
builder_death.js
--- Test.Simple.old/tests/builder_ death.js 2008-04-01

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-02T03:17:55Z

Huh. I don't see TestResult.js or builder_death.js in that diff. I'd
think that TestResult.js would be showing up as deleted, and
builder_death.js surely must have *some* differences…
But I agree that things look good.
Best,
David

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-02T03:16:53Z

Agreed.
Best,
David

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-02T00:58:43Z

It's hard to know. Since the old repository is gone, I can't perform
an "svn log" or an "svn diff" and AFAIK the commits weren't being
archived anywhere at that point. From spelunking the .svn/ files, it
looks like TestResult.js got added during 518.
I performed a "diff -ru" from my old local copy against the new repos

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-02T00:15:02Z

It was a start. The idea was to beef up the OO discipline level a
bit, and break a chunk out of the gnarly center. It's pretty hard to
follow what's going on in there -- and the original Perl Test::Simple
is harder still. It's going to take more refactoring yet to get to
the point where internal test result tracking makes sense to an

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-01T23:40:28Z

Yep. Did you commit those files in a commit separate from when you
modified the other files that referred to them? For example, all the
code had been updated to use TestResult, it's just that the file
wasn't there.
Thanks,
David

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-01T23:36:36Z

BTW, this commit message isn't accurate:
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------
r9 | theory | 2008-03-31 15:35:42 -0700 (Mon, 31 Mar 2008) | 3 lines
* Restored missing files that Marvin forgot to commit to the old
repository.
* Set `svn:keywords` on the class files.

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-01T23:28:05Z

Oh, good. Removing it, then. Thanks!
Yeah, builder_death.html is where I copied the code from, somewhere in
the archives, since it wasn't in the new svn. Good spot, thanks.
Bleh.
Yes, I thought TestResult was supposed to fix that. But I guess it was
mainly just a refactoring, eh?
So we nee some way to get that data to the harness from Test.Builder.

Re: Please Test Test.Simple

2008-04-01T23:00:28Z

Yes, leaving it out works -- in all 6 browsers, and with no errors
reported in the FF console.
Actually, I note that the last version of the patch I submitted,
archived at <[link]>, didn't include the force. Forcing
was only needed in the earlier versions where the the test was