Message from discussion
Closure-compiler Build Passes All Unit Tests
Received: by 10.52.32.66 with SMTP id g2mr9962087vdi.5.1333471485048;
Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: jquery-bugs-team@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.108.7 with SMTP id d7ls1838405vcp.4.gmail; Tue, 03 Apr
2012 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.38.231 with SMTP id j7mr1043654vdk.5.1333471484736;
Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chad Killingsworth <chadkillingswo...@missouristate.edu>
To: jquery-bugs-team@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <28105680.268.1333471484343.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynko12>
Subject: Closure-compiler Build Passes All Unit Tests
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_266_9044116.1333471484342"
------=_Part_266_9044116.1333471484342
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_267_2892540.1333471484342"
------=_Part_267_2892540.1333471484342
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
As of this morning, I finally have a Closure-compiler compatible build of
jQuery that passes all the current unit tests if FireFox (I haven't test
extensively in other browsers yet, but I don't anticipate major issues).
However, my personal git fork is a minor disaster so I'll be deleting the
current repository and re-forking. I'll then re-integrate my changes
(something I'm getting pretty fast at) and push them for review.
Based on the current branch/tag discussion for 1.8, what should I use as
the source reference?
Chad Killingsworth
------=_Part_267_2892540.1333471484342
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
As of this morning, I finally have a Closure-compiler compatible build of jQuery that passes all the current unit tests if FireFox (I haven't test extensively in other browsers yet, but I don't anticipate major issues).<div><br></div><div>However, my personal git fork is a minor disaster so I'll be deleting the current repository and re-forking. I'll then re-integrate my changes (something I'm getting pretty fast at) and push them for review.</div><div><br></div><div>Based on the current branch/tag discussion for 1.8, what should I use as the source reference?</div><div><br></div><div>Chad Killingsworth</div>
------=_Part_267_2892540.1333471484342--
------=_Part_266_9044116.1333471484342--