jPOS Users Google Group

Re: [jpos-users] Jpos

2009-11-11T11:04:56Z

Sorry?
If you mean this group, you seemed to have made it?

Jpos

2009-11-11T10:16:06Z

Hi
I am also waiting for joining with group
Regards
-Kapila

Re: Get packager dynamically using the TPDU content

2009-11-11T09:42:00Z

I found it. Thanks Mark!

Re: [jpos-users] Re: Get packager dynamically using the TPDU content

2009-11-11T08:08:07Z

The combination of the two should provide what is needed. Patch r2793
is available in SVN, as discussed in thread :-
[link]

Re: jPOS group on Facebook

2009-11-11T03:57:03Z

Thanks Alejandro ;)

take care

Re: jPOS group on Facebook

2009-11-11T03:56:47Z

Thanks Alejandro ;)

take care

Re: Get packager dynamically using the TPDU content

2009-11-11T02:13:15Z

Hi Mark,

Thanks~! I understand that I might need to extend the NACChannel to
fit the vendor's protocol. I am still waiting for my NAC vendor to
confirm the details. By the way, I know Alejandro Revilla has added
the patch r2791 for adding method getDynamicPackager(header, b) to
BaseChannel but it seems receive() method still calling

Re: [jpos-users] Get packager dynamically using the TPDU content

2009-11-10T09:18:09Z

Can you give the format of the length (binary and endian, character etc)?
Your vendors way of indicating the message length might not match
NACChannels...
1. Look at the source.
2. Look at the source again 8).
3. extend NACChannel - if that matches your network protocol, the
override getDynamicPackager(header, b) to return the packager based upon

Get packager dynamically using the TPDU content

2009-11-10T05:13:03Z

Hi all,

Thanks for your opinion in my previous post!

Finally, our system would connect to a NAC vendor to receive the
iso8583 message. The protocol used would be: [2byte Message length]
+[5byte TPDU]+[iso 8583 message], so I think the NACChannel would be a
good starting point for my work.(Please comment if I am wrong).

Re: [jpos-users] jPOS group on Facebook

2009-11-09T14:29:29Z

Great!

jPOS group on Facebook

2009-11-09T11:04:27Z

Hi guys, I have cerated jPOS group on facebook. feel free to
join..take care

Re: Problem identifying the source of iso8583

2009-11-09T09:14:37Z

Hi all,

This is my first post in the group. I really appreciate your reply!
Thanks for sharing~!

Kelvin

Re: Problem identifying the source of iso8583

2009-11-07T01:14:59Z

I totally agree with you guys. The first step is understand the ISO
format
for both 2 banks. If they indicate field 32 as a bank ID, the problem
is solved.
If not, the only way is making some header information.

Re: [jpos-users] Re: Problem identifying the source of iso8583

2009-11-06T08:35:03Z

As we all know the thousands of variations between various 8583
implementations. To make it scalable you should probably look into
look into getting some sort of custom header prepended by the
middleman that is forwarding the messages to you after acquiring
transactions from the banks.
Or look into getting a connection per bank message.

Re: [jpos-users] Re: Problem identifying the source of iso8583

2009-11-06T08:07:04Z

Can I ask you start quoting ISO8583 source and versions and variants
please?
Field 2 - often used for PAN - is also usually variable length. So your
statement is wrong I'm afraid.
As David indicates this is not a universal approach - many things will
stop it working. Having said that, it might work for your vendor's