*String s = m.getString ("127.2") if you want to get the Switch Key.*
My question is, what kind of sub-fields' definition is being followed here?
Is there any generic schema, if we don't have one specified by our network.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Chhil <chil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Your specification should tell u that there would be a bitmap for accessing
> fields inside 127.
> The field definitions vary from network to network.
> -Chhil
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:17 AM, "M. Aatif Ghafoor" <gaa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
> I have some question about field *127*, how the sub-fields are packaged
> into it? do they have specific size and index for each?
> How do I know that which sub-field is present and which is not?
> -------
> Aatif
-- -------
Muhammad Aatif Ghafoor
Team Lead Developer
Paybox Pakistan Pvt. Ltd.
56-XX, DHA
Lahore,
Pakistan
Cell: 92-333-8125575
Tel: 92-42-111-PAYBOX (729269)
> *String s = m.getString ("127.2") if you want to get the Switch Key.*
> My question is, what kind of sub-fields' definition is being followed > here?
Looks like this field 127 contains a bitmap.
> Is there any generic schema,
No, each interface can dictates it's own use (or not) of field 127.
As Chhil indicates the structure of your field 127 drives the mechanism of extracting any sub-components.
How is your field 127 structured? Does it have a bitmap, or does it contain fixed length mandatory sub-components?
> if we don't have one specified by our network.
If you have field 127, then you should also have the definition of it's content/structure. This definition must include details of any sub-components and how their presence - if conditional - is indicated.
I guess there is something in your field 127 that you want to access? If so, how did you know you needed or where it is to be located?
> *String s = m.getString ("127.2") if you want to get the Switch Key.*
> My question is, what kind of sub-fields' definition is being followed here?
> Is there any generic schema, if we don't have one specified by our network.
> Regards,
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Chhil <chil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Your specification should tell u that there would be a bitmap for
>> accessing fields inside 127.
>> The field definitions vary from network to network.
>> -Chhil
>> On Oct 27, 2009, at 11:17 AM, "M. Aatif Ghafoor" <gaa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> Hello Everybody,
>> I have some question about field *127*, how the sub-fields are packaged
>> into it? do they have specific size and index for each?
>> How do I know that which sub-field is present and which is not?
>> -------
>> Aatif
> --
> -------
> Muhammad Aatif Ghafoor
> Team Lead Developer
> Paybox Pakistan Pvt. Ltd.
> 56-XX, DHA
> Lahore,
> Pakistan
> Cell: 92-333-8125575
> Tel: 92-42-111-PAYBOX (729269)
|
