I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our websites. Not
only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of them. I
have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I have a
proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much feedback will
need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you as to if
this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
-----
Brad Baker
Twitter @xyzulu <http://twitter.com/xyzulu>
The Joomla Community: community.joomla.org
I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is very
difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some site goals,
target audiences, and site and organization messages. I'd also recommend
evaluate what content is on the site, what's missing, and what's out of
date. This could help drive a good site map for the site, and building could
go from there.
From: Brad Baker [mailto:brad.ba...@community.joomla.org] Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 7:33 PM
To: joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
Subject: Joomla sites redesign
I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our websites. Not
only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of them. I
have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I have a
proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much feedback will
need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you as to if
this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
----- Brad Baker
Twitter @xyzulu <http://twitter.com/xyzulu>
The Joomla Community: community.joomla.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there is a lot
of information on the various sites which makes it hard to find what you
want. I have to assume that we will still have different web sites for
different purposes (ie. www, community, developer, help, etc). ... just my
2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is very
> difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some site goals,
> target audiences, and site and organization messages. I'd also recommend
> evaluate what content is on the site, what's missing, and what's out of
> date. This could help drive a good site map for the site, and building could
> go from there.
> thanks,
> Jen
> .........................
> Jen Kramer
> 4Web, Inc.
> Creators of Highly Customized Joomla Websites
> www.4webinc.com > 802-257-2657
> j...@4webinc.com
> Twitter: jen4web
> Read our blog! www.joomla4web.com
> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our websites.
> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of them.
> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I have a
> proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much feedback will
> need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you as to if
> this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
-- Kenneth Crowder (aka ChiefGoFor)
Joomla Leadership Team
I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we need to
do different this time though is really evaluate content and information and
outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare bones template and then
design up from there.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org> wrote:
> I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there is a
> lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to find what you
> want. I have to assume that we will still have different web sites for
> different purposes (ie. www, community, developer, help, etc). ... just my
> 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is very
>> difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some site goals,
>> target audiences, and site and organization messages. I'd also recommend
>> evaluate what content is on the site, what's missing, and what's out of
>> date. This could help drive a good site map for the site, and building could
>> go from there.
>> thanks,
>> Jen
>> .........................
>> Jen Kramer
>> 4Web, Inc.
>> Creators of Highly Customized Joomla Websites
>> www.4webinc.com >> 802-257-2657
>> j...@4webinc.com
>> Twitter: jen4web
>> Read our blog! www.joomla4web.com
>> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our websites.
>> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of them.
>> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I have a
>> proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much feedback will
>> need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
>> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you as to if
>> this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely
difficult. I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define
what the purpose of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how
people are going to navigate through it to find the information that
the purpose defines), and design a structural mock up that illustrates
how the sites operationally work together, and how the informational
structure on each site may be linked, then drill down from there to
creating and defining the individual structure of each site. Having
that foundation really well thought out will increase the usability of
the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do
people feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at
the bottom of big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those
in use.
<wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we need to
> do different this time though is really evaluate content and information and
> outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare bones template and then
> design up from there.
> I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> Wendy
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org> wrote:
> > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there is a
> > lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to find what you
> > want. I have to assume that we will still have different web sites for
> > different purposes (ie. www, community, developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is very
> >> difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some site goals,
> >> target audiences, and site and organization messages. I'd also recommend
> >> evaluate what content is on the site, what's missing, and what's out of
> >> date. This could help drive a good site map for the site, and building could
> >> go from there.
> >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our websites.
> >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of them.
> >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I have a
> >> proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much feedback will
> >> need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you as to if
> >> this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> >> .
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> >> .
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and relatively
straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include dropdowns,
can be inaccessible and confusing.
However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying to
solve.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely difficult.
I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the purpose
of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going to
navigate through it to find the information that the purpose defines), and
design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites operationally
work together, and how the informational structure on each site may be
linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the individual
structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought out will
increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do people
feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the bottom of
big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
Jenny
On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
<wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content and > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare > bones template and then design up from there.
> I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> Wendy
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org>
wrote:
> > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community, > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization messages. > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good site > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
websites.
> >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of
them.
> >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> >> .
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> >> .
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> >> .
> >> For more options, visit this group at > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to
joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community
> > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and relatively
> straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include dropdowns,
> can be inaccessible and confusing.
> However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
> structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying to
> solve.
> Jen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely difficult.
> I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the purpose
> of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going to
> navigate through it to find the information that the purpose defines), and
> design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites operationally
> work together, and how the informational structure on each site may be
> linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the individual
> structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought out will
> increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do people
> feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the bottom of
> big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> Jenny
> On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we
> > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content and
> > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare
> > bones template and then design up from there.
> > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > Wendy
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> wrote:
> > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there
> > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to
> > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community,
> > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is
> > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some
> > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization messages.
> > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's
> > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good site
> > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
> websites.
> > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of
> them.
> > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I
> > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much
> > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you
> > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > >> .
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > >> .
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > >> .
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > >> .
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community
> > > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> As I said Jen it was just a general question. Just wanted to know
> what people thought about them.
> Jenny
> On Dec 6, 10:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and relatively
> > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include dropdowns,
> > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
> > structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying to
> > solve.
> > Jen
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely difficult.
> > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the purpose
> > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going to
> > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose defines), and
> > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites operationally
> > work together, and how the informational structure on each site may be
> > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the individual
> > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought out will
> > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do people
> > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the bottom of
> > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> > Jenny
> > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we
> > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content and
> > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare
> > > bones template and then design up from there.
> > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > > Wendy
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there
> > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to
> > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community,
> > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is
> > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some
> > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization messages.
> > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's
> > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good site
> > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
> > websites.
> > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of
> > them.
> > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I
> > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much
> > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you
> > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > >> .
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > >> .
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community
> > > > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
I think this project is a great idea. Ron Severdia and Airton and I have
had some email discussions over the last couple of months about possible
changes on the Community site (navigation and home page content
restructuring). Even better would be a unified effort to make things simpler
and more consistent across all the J! websites.
Thanks for bringing up this idea!
paul
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Brad Baker
<brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>wrote:
> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our websites.
> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of them.
> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I have a
> proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much feedback will
> need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you as to if
> this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> I think this project is a great idea. Ron Severdia and Airton and I have
> had some email discussions over the last couple of months about possible
> changes on the Community site (navigation and home page content
> restructuring). Even better would be a unified effort to make things simpler
> and more consistent across all the J! websites.
> Thanks for bringing up this idea!
> paul
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Brad Baker <
> brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our websites.
>> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of them.
>> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I have a
>> proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much feedback will
>> need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
>> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you as to if
>> this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
-----
Brad Baker
Twitter @xyzulu <http://twitter.com/xyzulu>
The Joomla Community: community.joomla.org
I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it could
work as a phase 1 band-aid.
I have found that in Academic sites or in very large organizational
sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of all
pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to manage
and maintain this list)
Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and relatively
> straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include dropdowns,
> can be inaccessible and confusing.
> However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
> structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying to
> solve.
> Jen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely difficult.
> I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the purpose
> of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going to
> navigate through it to find the information that the purpose defines), and
> design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites operationally
> work together, and how the informational structure on each site may be
> linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the individual
> structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought out will
> increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do people
> feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the bottom of
> big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> Jenny
> On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we
> > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content and
> > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare
> > bones template and then design up from there.
> > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > Wendy
> > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> wrote:
> > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there
> > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to
> > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community,
> > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is
> > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some
> > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization messages.
> > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's
> > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good site
> > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
> websites.
> > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of
> them.
> > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I
> > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much
> > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you
> > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > >> .
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > >> .
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > >> .
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > >> .
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community
> > > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > .
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
> including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it could
> work as a phase 1 band-aid.
> I have found that in Academic sites or in very large organizational
> sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of all
> pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to manage
> and maintain this list)
> Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
> attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
> On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and relatively
> > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include dropdowns,
> > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
> > structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying to
> > solve.
> > Jen
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely difficult.
> > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the purpose
> > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going to
> > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose defines), and
> > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites operationally
> > work together, and how the informational structure on each site may be
> > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the individual
> > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought out will
> > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do people
> > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the bottom of
> > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> > Jenny
> > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we
> > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content and
> > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare
> > > bones template and then design up from there.
> > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > > Wendy
> > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there
> > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to
> > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community,
> > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is
> > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some
> > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization messages.
> > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's
> > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good site
> > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
> > websites.
> > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of
> > them.
> > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I
> > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much
> > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you
> > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > >> .
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > >> .
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > >> .
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community
> > > > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > .
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
automatically put on hold that extension
2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may help
searching jed easier maybe
3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even relevant
to the search.
4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
community
email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
done.
at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
users.
Pierre Gazzola
On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
> Having a busy week though ;)
> On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
> > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it could
> > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
> > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large organizational
> > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of all
> > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to manage
> > and maintain this list)
> > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
> > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
> > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and relatively
> > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include dropdowns,
> > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
> > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying to
> > > solve.
> > > Jen
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely difficult.
> > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the purpose
> > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going to
> > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose defines), and
> > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites operationally
> > > work together, and how the informational structure on each site may be
> > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the individual
> > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought out will
> > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do people
> > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the bottom of
> > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> > > Jenny
> > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what we
> > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content and
> > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare
> > > > bones template and then design up from there.
> > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > > > Wendy
> > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated, there
> > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard to
> > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community,
> > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is
> > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on some
> > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization messages.
> > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's
> > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good site
> > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
> > > websites.
> > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of some of
> > > them.
> > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless I
> > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and much
> > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we being.
> > > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of you
> > > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > >> .
> > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > >> .
> > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > >> .
> > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-communit
> > > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > >> .
> > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community
> > > > > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > .
> > > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be great also to had features for jed.
> 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
> automatically put on hold that extension
> 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may help
> searching jed easier maybe
> 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even relevant
> to the search.
> 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
> 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
> community
> email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
> done.
> at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
> users.
> Pierre Gazzola
> On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> > Yes, we need an overall approach.
> > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
> > Having a busy week though ;)
> > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
> > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it could
> > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
> > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large organizational
> > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of all
> > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to manage
> > > and maintain this list)
> > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
> > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
> > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
> relatively
> > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include
> dropdowns,
> > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
> > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying
> to
> > > > solve.
> > > > Jen
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely
> difficult.
> > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the
> purpose
> > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going
> to
> > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
> defines), and
> > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
> operationally
> > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each site may
> be
> > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the
> individual
> > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought
> out will
> > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do
> people
> > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the
> bottom of
> > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> > > > Jenny
> > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what
> we
> > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content
> and
> > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare
> > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
> > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > > > > Wendy
> > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
> ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated,
> there
> > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard
> to
> > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community,
> > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is
> > > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on
> some
> > > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization
> messages.
> > > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's
> > > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good
> site
> > > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
> > > > websites.
> > > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of
> some of
> > > > them.
> > > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless
> I
> > > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and
> much
> > > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we
> being.
> > > > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of
> you
> > > > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google
> > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > > >> .
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> <joomla-wg-communit
> > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2B y%252Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google
> > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > > >> .
> > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> <joomla-wg-communit
> > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2B y%252Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> Google
> > > > > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> <joomla-wg-community
> > > > > > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2B% 252Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups
> > > > "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> > > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> groups.google.com/group/joomla-wg-community?hl=en.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> To post to this group, send email to joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
Elin
On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee and others
> are already discussing that.
> As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have. Thanks
> for sharing.
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It would be great also to had features for jed.
> > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
> > automatically put on hold that extension
> > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may help
> > searching jed easier maybe
> > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even relevant
> > to the search.
> > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
> > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
> > community
> > email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
> > done.
> > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
> > users.
> > Pierre Gazzola
> > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
> > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
> > > Having a busy week though ;)
> > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
> > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it could
> > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
> > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large organizational
> > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of all
> > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to manage
> > > > and maintain this list)
> > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
> > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
> > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
> > relatively
> > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include
> > dropdowns,
> > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing navigation
> > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're trying
> > to
> > > > > solve.
> > > > > Jen
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely
> > difficult.
> > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what the
> > purpose
> > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are going
> > to
> > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
> > defines), and
> > > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
> > operationally
> > > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each site may
> > be
> > > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the
> > individual
> > > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well thought
> > out will
> > > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> > > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How do
> > people
> > > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the
> > bottom of
> > > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> > > > > Jenny
> > > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> > > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think what
> > we
> > > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate content
> > and
> > > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a bare
> > > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
> > > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > > > > > Wendy
> > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
> > ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated,
> > there
> > > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it hard
> > to
> > > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www, community,
> > > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's suggestions.
> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <focused...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the content is
> > > > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on
> > some
> > > > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization
> > messages.
> > > > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site, what's
> > > > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a good
> > site
> > > > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > > > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of our
> > > > > websites.
> > > > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content of
> > some of
> > > > > them.
> > > > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem unless
> > I
> > > > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though, and
> > much
> > > > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before we
> > being.
> > > > > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest of
> > you
> > > > > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > > > >> .
> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > <joomla-wg-communit
> > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2B y%252Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > > > >> .
> > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > <joomla-wg-communit
> > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+y%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2B y%252Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > > > Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > <joomla-wg-community
> > > > > > > joomla-wg-community+%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2B% 252Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups
> > > > > "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to
Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende behov for
en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til oversættelse,
internationalisering og lokalisering.
Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at forbedre
brugeroplevelsen på j.org
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
> Elin
> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee and
> others
> > are already discussing that.
> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have. Thanks
> > for sharing.
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
> > > automatically put on hold that extension
> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may help
> > > searching jed easier maybe
> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even relevant
> > > to the search.
> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
> > > community
> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
> > > done.
> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
> > > users.
> > > Pierre Gazzola
> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it
> could
> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large organizational
> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of
> all
> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to
> manage
> > > > > and maintain this list)
> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
> > > relatively
> > > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include
> > > dropdowns,
> > > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> > > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing
> navigation
> > > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're
> trying
> > > to
> > > > > > solve.
> > > > > > Jen
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> > > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> > > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> > > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is extremely
> > > difficult.
> > > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what
> the
> > > purpose
> > > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are
> going
> > > to
> > > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
> > > defines), and
> > > > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
> > > operationally
> > > > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each site
> may
> > > be
> > > > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the
> > > individual
> > > > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well
> thought
> > > out will
> > > > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> > > > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How
> do
> > > people
> > > > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the
> > > bottom of
> > > > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> > > > > > Jenny
> > > > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> > > > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think
> what
> > > we
> > > > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate
> content
> > > and
> > > > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a
> bare
> > > > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
> > > > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> > > > > > > Wendy
> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
> > > ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been stated,
> > > there
> > > > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it
> hard
> > > to
> > > > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
> > > > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www,
> community,
> > > > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> > > > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's
> suggestions.
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <
> focused...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the
> content is
> > > > > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working on
> > > some
> > > > > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization
> > > messages.
> > > > > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site,
> what's
> > > > > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a
> good
> > > site
> > > > > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
> > > > > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of
> our
> > > > > > websites.
> > > > > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content
> of
> > > some of
> > > > > > them.
> > > > > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem
> unless
> > > I
> > > > > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though,
> and
> > > much
> > > > > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams before
> we
> > > being.
> > > > > > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest
> of
> > > you
> > > > > > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed me/us.
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > Google
> > > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > > > > >> .
> > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> <joomla-wg-community%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%252 Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
> > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > > Google
> > > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
> > > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
> > > > > > > >> .
> > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
> <joomla-wg-community%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%252 Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org> wrote:
> Hej folkens,
> Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende behov for
> en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til oversættelse,
> internationalisering og lokalisering.
> Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at forbedre
> brugeroplevelsen på j.org
> Ole
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
>> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
>> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
>> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
>> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
>> Elin
>> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee and
>> others
>> > are already discussing that.
>> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have.
>> Thanks
>> > for sharing.
>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
>> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
>> > > automatically put on hold that extension
>> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may help
>> > > searching jed easier maybe
>> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even relevant
>> > > to the search.
>> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
>> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
>> > > community
>> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
>> > > done.
>> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
>> > > users.
>> > > Pierre Gazzola
>> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
>> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
>> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
>> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
>> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it
>> could
>> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
>> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large
>> organizational
>> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of
>> all
>> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to
>> manage
>> > > > > and maintain this list)
>> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
>> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
>> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
>> > > relatively
>> > > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they include
>> > > dropdowns,
>> > > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
>> > > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing
>> navigation
>> > > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're
>> trying
>> > > to
>> > > > > > solve.
>> > > > > > Jen
>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
>> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
>> > > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
>> > > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
>> > > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is
>> extremely
>> > > difficult.
>> > > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what
>> the
>> > > purpose
>> > > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are
>> going
>> > > to
>> > > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
>> > > defines), and
>> > > > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
>> > > operationally
>> > > > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each site
>> may
>> > > be
>> > > > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the
>> > > individual
>> > > > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well
>> thought
>> > > out will
>> > > > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
>> > > > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How
>> do
>> > > people
>> > > > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at the
>> > > bottom of
>> > > > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
>> > > > > > Jenny
>> > > > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
>> > > > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
>> > > > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think
>> what
>> > > we
>> > > > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate
>> content
>> > > and
>> > > > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a
>> bare
>> > > > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
>> > > > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
>> > > > > > > Wendy
>> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
>> > > ken.crow...@joomla.org>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been
>> stated,
>> > > there
>> > > > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it
>> hard
>> > > to
>> > > > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still have
>> > > > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www,
>> community,
>> > > > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
>> > > > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's
>> suggestions.
>> > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <
>> focused...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the
>> content is
>> > > > > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working
>> on
>> > > some
>> > > > > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization
>> > > messages.
>> > > > > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site,
>> what's
>> > > > > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a
>> good
>> > > site
>> > > > > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
>> > > > > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of
>> our
>> > > > > > websites.
>> > > > > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the layout/content
>> of
>> > > some of
>> > > > > > them.
>> > > > > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem
>> unless
>> > > I
>> > > > > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though,
>> and
>> > > much
>> > > > > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams
>> before we
>> > > being.
>> > > > > > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest
>> of
>> > > you
>> > > > > > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed
>> me/us.
>> > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> > > Google
>> > > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
>> > > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
>> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
>> > > > > > > >> .
>> > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%2Bunsu bscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> <joomla-wg-community%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com<joomla-wg-community%252 Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com>
>> > > > > > > >> --
>> > > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>> > > Google
>> > > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
>> > > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
>> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
>> > > > > > > >> .
>> > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org> wrote:
>> Hej folkens,
>> Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende behov for
>> en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til oversættelse,
>> internationalisering og lokalisering.
>> Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at forbedre
>> brugeroplevelsen på j.org
>> Ole
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
>>> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
>>> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
>>> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
>>> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
>>> Elin
>>> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>>> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee and
>>> > others
>>> > are already discussing that.
>>> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have.
>>> > Thanks
>>> > for sharing.
>>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
>>> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
>>> > > automatically put on hold that extension
>>> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may help
>>> > > searching jed easier maybe
>>> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even
>>> > > relevant
>>> > > to the search.
>>> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
>>> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
>>> > > community
>>> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
>>> > > done.
>>> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
>>> > > users.
>>> > > Pierre Gazzola
>>> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
>>> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
>>> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
>>> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
>>> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it
>>> > > > > could
>>> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
>>> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large
>>> > > > > organizational
>>> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of
>>> > > > > all
>>> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to
>>> > > > > manage
>>> > > > > and maintain this list)
>>> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
>>> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
>>> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
>>> > > relatively
>>> > > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they
>>> > > > > > include
>>> > > dropdowns,
>>> > > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
>>> > > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing
>>> > > > > > navigation
>>> > > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're
>>> > > > > > trying
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > solve.
>>> > > > > > Jen
>>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
>>> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
>>> > > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
>>> > > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
>>> > > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is
>>> > > > > > extremely
>>> > > difficult.
>>> > > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > purpose
>>> > > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are
>>> > > > > > going
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
>>> > > defines), and
>>> > > > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
>>> > > operationally
>>> > > > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each site
>>> > > > > > may
>>> > > be
>>> > > > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the
>>> > > individual
>>> > > > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well
>>> > > > > > thought
>>> > > out will
>>> > > > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
>>> > > > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How
>>> > > > > > do
>>> > > people
>>> > > > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at
>>> > > > > > the
>>> > > bottom of
>>> > > > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
>>> > > > > > Jenny
>>> > > > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
>>> > > > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think
>>> > > > > > > what
>>> > > we
>>> > > > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate
>>> > > > > > > content
>>> > > and
>>> > > > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a
>>> > > > > > > bare
>>> > > > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
>>> > > > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
>>> > > > > > > Wendy
>>> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
>>> > > ken.crow...@joomla.org>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been
>>> > > > > > > > stated,
>>> > > there
>>> > > > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it
>>> > > > > > > > hard
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still
>>> > > > > > > > have
>>> > > > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www,
>>> > > > > > > > community,
>>> > > > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
>>> > > > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's
>>> > > > > > > > suggestions.
>>> > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer
>>> > > > > > > > <focused...@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the
>>> > > > > > > >> content is
>>> > > > > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working
>>> > > > > > > >> on
>>> > > some
>>> > > > > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization
>>> > > messages.
>>> > > > > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site,
>>> > > > > > > >> what's
>>> > > > > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a
>>> > > > > > > >> good
>>> > > site
>>> > > > > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
>>> > > > > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of
>>> > > > > > > >> our
>>> > > > > > websites.
>>> > > > > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the
>>> > > > > > > >> layout/content of
>>> > > some of
>>> > > > > > them.
>>> > > > > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem
>>> > > > > > > >> unless
>>> > > I
>>> > > > > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though,
>>> > > > > > > >> and
>>> > > much
>>> > > > > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams
>>> > > > > > > >> before we
>>> > > being.
>>> > > > > > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest
>>> > > > > > > >> of
>>> > > you
>>> > > > > > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed
>>> > > > > > > >> me/us.
>>> > > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>> > > > > > > >> the
>>> > > Google
>>> > > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
>>> > > > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to
>>> > > > > > > >> joomla-wg-community@googlegroups.com
>>> > > > > > > >> .
>>> > > > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Thanks Brad, was fishing for exactly that reply :p
Tried to find a way of explaining the importance of us welcoming the whole
joomla community when they visit j.org - especially those not understanding
the english language.
Now they will meet a strange text as above... Think we wouldnt do wrong in
thinking in some welcoming pointers for those to some basic info about
Joomla! - in their preferred language.
For those not comfortable with danish, the above text says:
Hey folks,
Seen from an international perspective, then there is a growing demand for a
better presentation and organisation of content related to translation,
internationalisation and localisation.
We from the Translation Coordination Team (TCT) would like to be a part of
this general process of improving the overall user experience at j.org
brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> Ole.. English please :P
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org>wrote:
>> Hej folkens,
>> Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende behov for
>> en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til oversættelse,
>> internationalisering og lokalisering.
>> Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at forbedre
>> brugeroplevelsen på j.org
>> Ole
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
>>> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
>>> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
>>> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
>>> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
>>> Elin
>>> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>>> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee and
>>> others
>>> > are already discussing that.
>>> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have.
>>> Thanks
>>> > for sharing.
>>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
>>> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
>>> > > automatically put on hold that extension
>>> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may help
>>> > > searching jed easier maybe
>>> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even
>>> relevant
>>> > > to the search.
>>> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
>>> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
>>> > > community
>>> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
>>> > > done.
>>> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
>>> > > users.
>>> > > Pierre Gazzola
>>> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
>>> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
>>> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
>>> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
>>> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it
>>> could
>>> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
>>> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large
>>> organizational
>>> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of
>>> all
>>> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to
>>> manage
>>> > > > > and maintain this list)
>>> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
>>> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
>>> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
>>> > > relatively
>>> > > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they
>>> include
>>> > > dropdowns,
>>> > > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
>>> > > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing
>>> navigation
>>> > > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're
>>> trying
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > solve.
>>> > > > > > Jen
>>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>> > > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
>>> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
>>> > > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
>>> > > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
>>> > > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is
>>> extremely
>>> > > difficult.
>>> > > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what
>>> the
>>> > > purpose
>>> > > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are
>>> going
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
>>> > > defines), and
>>> > > > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
>>> > > operationally
>>> > > > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each site
>>> may
>>> > > be
>>> > > > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining the
>>> > > individual
>>> > > > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well
>>> thought
>>> > > out will
>>> > > > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
>>> > > > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature - How
>>> do
>>> > > people
>>> > > > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at
>>> the
>>> > > bottom of
>>> > > > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
>>> > > > > > Jenny
>>> > > > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
>>> > > > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think
>>> what
>>> > > we
>>> > > > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate
>>> content
>>> > > and
>>> > > > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a
>>> bare
>>> > > > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
>>> > > > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
>>> > > > > > > Wendy
>>> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
>>> > > ken.crow...@joomla.org>
>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been
>>> stated,
>>> > > there
>>> > > > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes it
>>> hard
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still
>>> have
>>> > > > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www,
>>> community,
>>> > > > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
>>> > > > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's
>>> suggestions.
>>> > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <
>>> focused...@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the
>>> content is
>>> > > > > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working
>>> on
>>> > > some
>>> > > > > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization
>>> > > messages.
>>> > > > > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site,
>>> what's
>>> > > > > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a
>>> good
>>> > > site
>>> > > > > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
>>> > > > > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign of
>>> our
>>> > > > > > websites.
>>> > > > > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the
>>> layout/content of
>>> > > some of
>>> > > > > > them.
>>> > > > > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem
>>> unless
>>> > > I
>>> > > > > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task though,
>>> and
>>> > > much
>>> > > > > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams
>>> before we
>>> > > being.
>>> > > > > > > >> First, I just wanted to gather some feedback from the rest
>>> of
>>> > > you
>>> > > > > > > >> as to if this is a good path to start down. So.. feed
>>> me/us.
>>> > > > > > > >> --
>>> > > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>> the
>>> > > Google
>>> > > > > > > >> Groups "Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership" group.
>>> > > > > > > >> To post to this group,
Yip, once I get a moment I will put the general proposal I had on this list,
and will welcome your input so we can incorporate the need to appeal to more
than just English visitors. :) Thanks to you and your team.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org> wrote:
> Thanks Brad, was fishing for exactly that reply :p
> Tried to find a way of explaining the importance of us welcoming the whole
> joomla community when they visit j.org - especially those not
> understanding the english language.
> Now they will meet a strange text as above... Think we wouldnt do wrong in
> thinking in some welcoming pointers for those to some basic info about
> Joomla! - in their preferred language.
> For those not comfortable with danish, the above text says:
> Hey folks,
> Seen from an international perspective, then there is a growing demand
> for a better presentation and organisation of content related to
> translation, internationalisation and localisation.
> We from the Translation Coordination Team (TCT) would like to be a part of
> this general process of improving the overall user experience at j.org
> Ole
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Brad Baker <
> brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>> Ole.. English please :P
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org>wrote:
>>> Hej folkens,
>>> Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende behov
>>> for en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til
>>> oversættelse, internationalisering og lokalisering.
>>> Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at
>>> forbedre brugeroplevelsen på j.org
>>> Ole
>>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
>>>> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
>>>> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
>>>> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
>>>> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
>>>> Elin
>>>> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>>>> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee and
>>>> others
>>>> > are already discussing that.
>>>> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> > for sharing.
>>>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
>>>> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
>>>> > > automatically put on hold that extension
>>>> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may
>>>> help
>>>> > > searching jed easier maybe
>>>> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even
>>>> relevant
>>>> > > to the search.
>>>> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
>>>> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
>>>> > > community
>>>> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
>>>> > > done.
>>>> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
>>>> > > users.
>>>> > > Pierre Gazzola
>>>> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
>>>> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
>>>> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
>>>> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
>>>> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it
>>>> could
>>>> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
>>>> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large
>>>> organizational
>>>> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of
>>>> all
>>>> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to
>>>> manage
>>>> > > > > and maintain this list)
>>>> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
>>>> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
>>>> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
>>>> > > relatively
>>>> > > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they
>>>> include
>>>> > > dropdowns,
>>>> > > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
>>>> > > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing
>>>> navigation
>>>> > > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're
>>>> trying
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > > solve.
>>>> > > > > > Jen
>>>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
>>>> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
>>>> > > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
>>>> > > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
>>>> > > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is
>>>> extremely
>>>> > > difficult.
>>>> > > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what
>>>> the
>>>> > > purpose
>>>> > > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are
>>>> going
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
>>>> > > defines), and
>>>> > > > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
>>>> > > operationally
>>>> > > > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each
>>>> site may
>>>> > > be
>>>> > > > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining
>>>> the
>>>> > > individual
>>>> > > > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well
>>>> thought
>>>> > > out will
>>>> > > > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
>>>> > > > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature -
>>>> How do
>>>> > > people
>>>> > > > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at
>>>> the
>>>> > > bottom of
>>>> > > > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
>>>> > > > > > Jenny
>>>> > > > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
>>>> > > > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think
>>>> what
>>>> > > we
>>>> > > > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate
>>>> content
>>>> > > and
>>>> > > > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a
>>>> bare
>>>> > > > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
>>>> > > > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
>>>> > > > > > > Wendy
>>>> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
>>>> > > ken.crow...@joomla.org>
>>>> > > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been
>>>> stated,
>>>> > > there
>>>> > > > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes
>>>> it hard
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still
>>>> have
>>>> > > > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www,
>>>> community,
>>>> > > > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
>>>> > > > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's
>>>> suggestions.
>>>> > > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Jen Kramer <
>>>> focused...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > > >> I think this is an excellent suggestion. Some of the
>>>> content is
>>>> > > > > > > >> very difficult to find on the site. I'd recommend working
>>>> on
>>>> > > some
>>>> > > > > > > >> site goals, target audiences, and site and organization
>>>> > > messages.
>>>> > > > > > > >> I'd also recommend evaluate what content is on the site,
>>>> what's
>>>> > > > > > > >> missing, and what's out of date. This could help drive a
>>>> good
>>>> > > site
>>>> > > > > > > >> map for the site, and building could go from there.
>>>> > > > > > > >> I think it's time to get working on a complete redesign
>>>> of our
>>>> > > > > > websites.
>>>> > > > > > > >> Not only the templates, but perhaps also the
>>>> layout/content of
>>>> > > some of
>>>> > > > > > them.
>>>> > > > > > > >> I have some ideas, as I'm not one to mention the problem
>>>> unless
>>>> > > I
>>>> > > > > > > >> have a proposal for a solution. It's no small task
>>>> though, and
>>>> > > much
>>>> > > > > > > >> feedback will need to be gathered from internal teams
>>>> before we
>>>> > > being.
Ok.. I have a moment.. so here is my idea, well.. I'm presenting it,
but a number of people have discussed it with me. Special thanks to
Louis.
How about we come up with a simple, but clear Request for Proposal
that we can present to the community. The proposal would include new
templates for our Joomla 1.5 sites, the forum (phpbb3) as well as the
documentation wiki. Further to that, the proposals would include
layout and integration design wise of the sites. The proposal would
also include the implementation, obviously working in close
cooperation with the people who currently manage our sites.
I am sure there are plenty of experts with more experience than us who
can come up with some really sound proposals. Lots of people come to
us with ideas and things they would like changed or done better, so
this would allow them to present their proposals to the community and
for one to be chosen.
It would require a few peoples input initially to formulate the RFP,
but afterwards, more specifically to evaluate the proposals. The
winning proposal would be a great resume, and our RFP would also
include the way we're "reward" the winner, perhaps with a 'Credits'
page on joomla.org or something similar.
I'm presenting this here in a deliberately vague manner to allow for
input. At the end of the day, there would be a few stipulations, such
as having to incorporate the Joomla logo etc, but I think we'd receive
some really solid and worthy of implementation proposals. Do you?
I think this would be a wonderful way to open this part of our project
up to the community and receive their input this way. We'll never keep
everyone happy, but hey, I'm not even happy with the way I implement
things sometimes either ;)
On Dec 11, 9:36 am, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
wrote:
> Yip, once I get a moment I will put the general proposal I had on this list,
> and will welcome your input so we can incorporate the need to appeal to more
> than just English visitors. :) Thanks to you and your team.
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org> wrote:
> > Thanks Brad, was fishing for exactly that reply :p
> > Tried to find a way of explaining the importance of us welcoming the whole
> > joomla community when they visit j.org - especially those not
> > understanding the english language.
> > Now they will meet a strange text as above... Think we wouldnt do wrong in
> > thinking in some welcoming pointers for those to some basic info about
> > Joomla! - in their preferred language.
> > For those not comfortable with danish, the above text says:
> > Hey folks,
> > Seen from an international perspective, then there is a growing demand
> > for a better presentation and organisation of content related to
> > translation, internationalisation and localisation.
> > We from the Translation Coordination Team (TCT) would like to be a part of
> > this general process of improving the overall user experience at j.org
> > Ole
> > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Brad Baker <
> > brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> >> Ole.. English please :P
> >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org>wrote:
> >>> Hej folkens,
> >>> Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende behov
> >>> for en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til
> >>> oversættelse, internationalisering og lokalisering.
> >>> Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at
> >>> forbedre brugeroplevelsen på j.org
> >>> Ole
> >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
> >>>> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
> >>>> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
> >>>> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
> >>>> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
> >>>> Elin
> >>>> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> >>>> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee and
> >>>> others
> >>>> > are already discussing that.
> >>>> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have.
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> > for sharing.
> >>>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <lafranc...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
> >>>> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
> >>>> > > automatically put on hold that extension
> >>>> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may
> >>>> help
> >>>> > > searching jed easier maybe
> >>>> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even
> >>>> relevant
> >>>> > > to the search.
> >>>> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
> >>>> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to the
> >>>> > > community
> >>>> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and voila
> >>>> > > done.
> >>>> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
> >>>> > > users.
> >>>> > > Pierre Gazzola
> >>>> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
> >>>> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this list.
> >>>> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
> >>>> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the bottom,
> >>>> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide it
> >>>> could
> >>>> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
> >>>> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large
> >>>> organizational
> >>>> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z list of
> >>>> all
> >>>> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism to
> >>>> manage
> >>>> > > > > and maintain this list)
> >>>> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would we be
> >>>> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
> >>>> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible and
> >>>> > > relatively
> >>>> > > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they
> >>>> include
> >>>> > > dropdowns,
> >>>> > > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> >>>> > > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing
> >>>> navigation
> >>>> > > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem we're
> >>>> trying
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> > > > > > solve.
> >>>> > > > > > Jen
> >>>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> >>>> > > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com]
> >>>> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> >>>> > > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> >>>> > > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> >>>> > > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is
> >>>> extremely
> >>>> > > difficult.
> >>>> > > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define what
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > purpose
> >>>> > > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people are
> >>>> going
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> > > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the purpose
> >>>> > > defines), and
> >>>> > > > > > design a structural mock up that illustrates how the sites
> >>>> > > operationally
> >>>> > > > > > work together, and how the informational structure on each
> >>>> site may
> >>>> > > be
> >>>> > > > > > linked, then drill down from there to creating and defining
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > individual
> >>>> > > > > > structure of each site. Having that foundation really well
> >>>> thought
> >>>> > > out will
> >>>> > > > > > increase the usability of the sites ten-fold in my opinion.
> >>>> > > > > > As a kind of related question, but just general in nature -
> >>>> How do
> >>>> > > people
> >>>> > > > > > feel about mega type menus and the mini-site maps located at
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > bottom of
> >>>> > > > > > big sites? I seem to be seeing more and more of those in use.
> >>>> > > > > > Jenny
> >>>> > > > > > On Dec 5, 8:19 pm, Wendy Robinson
> >>>> > > > > > <wendy.robin...@opensourcematters.org> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > > I think a redesign is a great idea and most needed. I think
> >>>> what
> >>>> > > we
> >>>> > > > > > > need to do different this time though is really evaluate
> >>>> content
> >>>> > > and
> >>>> > > > > > > information and outline a structure on a mock up and then a
> >>>> bare
> >>>> > > > > > > bones template and then design up from there.
> >>>> > > > > > > I have some ideas too and happy to share.
> >>>> > > > > > > Wendy
> >>>> > > > > > > On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Ken Crowder <
> >>>> > > ken.crow...@joomla.org>
> >>>> > > > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > > > I'd like to see everything simplified. As it has been
> >>>> stated,
> >>>> > > there
> >>>> > > > > > > > is a lot of information on the various sites which makes
> >>>> it hard
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> > > > > > > > find what you want. I have to assume that we will still
> >>>> have
> >>>> > > > > > > > different web sites for different purposes (ie. www,
> >>>> community,
> >>>> > > > > > > > developer, help, etc). ... just my
> >>>> > > > > > > > 2.5 cents. I'm looking forward to everyone else's
> >>>> suggestions.
I'm not sure I like the idea of requesting proposals as of yet.
...mainly because we have not quite identified the entire scope of the
work. And obviously these points are not all for Brad to answer.
Just some questions that come to mind...
This leads to questions like, RFP for a paid gig? just for credit?
Who is paying for this work? If Joomla is paying for this work, who needs
to approve that?
If it is paid, it seems that we lose community involvement or do we?
If a person submits a proposal and they win, will they lead the work?
Who will ultimately be responsible for the development, the actual
production and the end product?
Is this really just a call for leadership and/or a facilitator?
Will this template work be hosted in such a place that Joomla community can
actively participate in that development?
Does the current content stay? or is there going to be some content
re-working?
The forums and the wiki's included? anything not included?
What is the timeline for deliverables?
My suggestion is that the proposals be made public from the start, in this
case it would be nice to know who is interested in submitting a proposal
sooner than when they are submitted, this way the process can be very open.
Would also seem logical that if several people or groups are wanting to
donate efforts that all efforts are accepted and the exclusivity game does
not play in.
If proposals will be made for a paid gig, should those proposals be managed
the same as the volunteer proposals?
Mike Hamanaka
Website Production
Vertualize.com
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org
> wrote:
> Ok.. I have a moment.. so here is my idea, well.. I'm presenting it,
> but a number of people have discussed it with me. Special thanks to
> Louis.
> How about we come up with a simple, but clear Request for Proposal
> that we can present to the community. The proposal would include new
> templates for our Joomla 1.5 sites, the forum (phpbb3) as well as the
> documentation wiki. Further to that, the proposals would include
> layout and integration design wise of the sites. The proposal would
> also include the implementation, obviously working in close
> cooperation with the people who currently manage our sites.
> I am sure there are plenty of experts with more experience than us who
> can come up with some really sound proposals. Lots of people come to
> us with ideas and things they would like changed or done better, so
> this would allow them to present their proposals to the community and
> for one to be chosen.
> It would require a few peoples input initially to formulate the RFP,
> but afterwards, more specifically to evaluate the proposals. The
> winning proposal would be a great resume, and our RFP would also
> include the way we're "reward" the winner, perhaps with a 'Credits'
> page on joomla.org or something similar.
> I'm presenting this here in a deliberately vague manner to allow for
> input. At the end of the day, there would be a few stipulations, such
> as having to incorporate the Joomla logo etc, but I think we'd receive
> some really solid and worthy of implementation proposals. Do you?
> I think this would be a wonderful way to open this part of our project
> up to the community and receive their input this way. We'll never keep
> everyone happy, but hey, I'm not even happy with the way I implement
> things sometimes either ;)
> On Dec 11, 9:36 am, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
> wrote:
> > Right.. I understand that language now :P
> > Yip, once I get a moment I will put the general proposal I had on this
> list,
> > and will welcome your input so we can incorporate the need to appeal to
> more
> > than just English visitors. :) Thanks to you and your team.
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org>
> wrote:
> > > Thanks Brad, was fishing for exactly that reply :p
> > > Tried to find a way of explaining the importance of us welcoming the
> whole
> > > joomla community when they visit j.org - especially those not
> > > understanding the english language.
> > > Now they will meet a strange text as above... Think we wouldnt do wrong
> in
> > > thinking in some welcoming pointers for those to some basic info about
> > > Joomla! - in their preferred language.
> > > For those not comfortable with danish, the above text says:
> > > Hey folks,
> > > Seen from an international perspective, then there is a growing demand
> > > for a better presentation and organisation of content related to
> > > translation, internationalisation and localisation.
> > > We from the Translation Coordination Team (TCT) would like to be a part
> of
> > > this general process of improving the overall user experience at j.org
> > > Ole
> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Brad Baker <
> > > brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> > >> Ole.. English please :P
> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org
> >wrote:
> > >>> Hej folkens,
> > >>> Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende
> behov
> > >>> for en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til
> > >>> oversættelse, internationalisering og lokalisering.
> > >>> Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at
> > >>> forbedre brugeroplevelsen på j.org
> > >>> Ole
> > >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about mega
> > >>>> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
> > >>>> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
> > >>>> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a module
> > >>>> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
> > >>>> Elin
> > >>>> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee
> and
> > >>>> others
> > >>>> > are already discussing that.
> > >>>> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I have.
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>> > for sharing.
> > >>>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <
> lafranc...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
> > >>>> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
> > >>>> > > automatically put on hold that extension
> > >>>> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this may
> > >>>> help
> > >>>> > > searching jed easier maybe
> > >>>> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even
> > >>>> relevant
> > >>>> > > to the search.
> > >>>> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
> > >>>> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to
> the
> > >>>> > > community
> > >>>> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and
> voila
> > >>>> > > done.
> > >>>> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that confuse
> > >>>> > > users.
> > >>>> > > Pierre Gazzola
> > >>>> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
> > >>>> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this
> list.
> > >>>> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
> > >>>> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the
> bottom,
> > >>>> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide
> it
> > >>>> could
> > >>>> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
> > >>>> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large
> > >>>> organizational
> > >>>> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z
> list of
> > >>>> all
> > >>>> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of mechanism
> to
> > >>>> manage
> > >>>> > > > > and maintain this list)
> > >>>> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would
> we be
> > >>>> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
> > >>>> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible
> and
> > >>>> > > relatively
> > >>>> > > > > > straightforward if implemented well. Mega menus, if they
> > >>>> include
> > >>>> > > dropdowns,
> > >>>> > > > > > can be inaccessible and confusing.
> > >>>> > > > > > However, I think it's really premature to be discussing
> > >>>> navigation
> > >>>> > > > > > structures without completely understanding the problem
> we're
> > >>>> trying
> > >>>> > > to
> > >>>> > > > > > solve.
> > >>>> > > > > > Jen
> > >>>> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> > > > > > From: Jennifer Marriott [mailto:marpomultime...@gmail.com
> ]
> > >>>> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, December 06, 2009 10:39 AM
> > >>>> > > > > > To: Joomla! Community Working Group Leadership
> > >>>> > > > > > Subject: Re: Joomla sites redesign
> > >>>> > > > > > I agree that finding the content you are looking for is
> > >>>> extremely
> > >>>> > > difficult.
> > >>>> > > > > > I think it would be good to evaluate each site and define
> what
> > >>>> the
> > >>>> > > purpose
> > >>>> > > > > > of the site is, and what the channel of use is (how people
> are
> > >>>> going
> > >>>> > > to
> > >>>> > > > > > navigate through it to find the information that the
> purpose
> > >>>> > > defines), and
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Michael Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I'm not sure I like the idea of requesting proposals as of yet.
> ...mainly because we have not quite identified the entire scope of the
> work. And obviously these points are not all for Brad to answer.
> Just some questions that come to mind...
> This leads to questions like, RFP for a paid gig? just for credit?
> Who is paying for this work? If Joomla is paying for this work, who needs
> to approve that?
> If it is paid, it seems that we lose community involvement or do we?
I'd like to think it will not involve money.
> If a person submits a proposal and they win, will they lead the work?
Yes
> Who will ultimately be responsible for the development, the actual
> production and the end product?
The Community Working Group
> Is this really just a call for leadership and/or a facilitator?
This is a discussion on a redesign of our sites.
> Will this template work be hosted in such a place that Joomla community can
> actively participate in that development?
I don't anticipate that would be the case. It would be up to the
person/organisation submitted the proposal.
> Does the current content stay? or is there going to be some content
> re-working?
This RFP would not include the content, that being said, I am sure some
content would need to be re-arranged.
> The forums and the wiki's included? anything not included?
Dunno, I can't think of anything else.
> What is the timeline for deliverables?
What do you suggest?
> My suggestion is that the proposals be made public from the start, in this
> case it would be nice to know who is interested in submitting a proposal
> sooner than when they are submitted, this way the process can be very open.
I'm not sure that we should force people to put their hand up and say they
are thinking of submitting a proposal. Also, I am not sure all proposals
should be published, again however, happy to hear other peoples input.
> Would also seem logical that if several people or groups are wanting to
> donate efforts that all efforts are accepted and the exclusivity game does
> not play in.
To me that would be up to the people submitting the proposal. How they want
to present themselves is up to them.
> If proposals will be made for a paid gig, should those proposals be managed
> the same as the volunteer proposals?
I'm not sure I follow this question, maybe you can explain.
> Mike Hamanaka
> Website Production
> Vertualize.com
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Brad Baker <
> brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>> Ok.. I have a moment.. so here is my idea, well.. I'm presenting it,
>> but a number of people have discussed it with me. Special thanks to
>> Louis.
>> How about we come up with a simple, but clear Request for Proposal
>> that we can present to the community. The proposal would include new
>> templates for our Joomla 1.5 sites, the forum (phpbb3) as well as the
>> documentation wiki. Further to that, the proposals would include
>> layout and integration design wise of the sites. The proposal would
>> also include the implementation, obviously working in close
>> cooperation with the people who currently manage our sites.
>> I am sure there are plenty of experts with more experience than us who
>> can come up with some really sound proposals. Lots of people come to
>> us with ideas and things they would like changed or done better, so
>> this would allow them to present their proposals to the community and
>> for one to be chosen.
>> It would require a few peoples input initially to formulate the RFP,
>> but afterwards, more specifically to evaluate the proposals. The
>> winning proposal would be a great resume, and our RFP would also
>> include the way we're "reward" the winner, perhaps with a 'Credits'
>> page on joomla.org or something similar.
>> I'm presenting this here in a deliberately vague manner to allow for
>> input. At the end of the day, there would be a few stipulations, such
>> as having to incorporate the Joomla logo etc, but I think we'd receive
>> some really solid and worthy of implementation proposals. Do you?
>> I think this would be a wonderful way to open this part of our project
>> up to the community and receive their input this way. We'll never keep
>> everyone happy, but hey, I'm not even happy with the way I implement
>> things sometimes either ;)
>> On Dec 11, 9:36 am, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Right.. I understand that language now :P
>> > Yip, once I get a moment I will put the general proposal I had on this
>> list,
>> > and will welcome your input so we can incorporate the need to appeal to
>> more
>> > than just English visitors. :) Thanks to you and your team.
>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > Thanks Brad, was fishing for exactly that reply :p
>> > > Tried to find a way of explaining the importance of us welcoming the
>> whole
>> > > joomla community when they visit j.org - especially those not
>> > > understanding the english language.
>> > > Now they will meet a strange text as above... Think we wouldnt do
>> wrong in
>> > > thinking in some welcoming pointers for those to some basic info about
>> > > Joomla! - in their preferred language.
>> > > For those not comfortable with danish, the above text says:
>> > > Hey folks,
>> > > Seen from an international perspective, then there is a growing demand
>> > > for a better presentation and organisation of content related to
>> > > translation, internationalisation and localisation.
>> > > We from the Translation Coordination Team (TCT) would like to be a
>> part of
>> > > this general process of improving the overall user experience at
>> j.org
>> > > Ole
>> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Brad Baker <
>> > > brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>> > >> Ole.. English please :P
>> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org
>> >wrote:
>> > >>> Hej folkens,
>> > >>> Set fra et internationalt perspektiv, så er der også et stigende
>> behov
>> > >>> for en bedre præsentation og organisering af indhold relateret til
>> > >>> oversættelse, internationalisering og lokalisering.
>> > >>> Vi fra TCT vil gerne være en del af denne generelle proces for at
>> > >>> forbedre brugeroplevelsen på j.org
>> > >>> Ole
>> > >>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:46 PM, elin <elin.war...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>> Jenny Ron and I actually started a discussion a while ago about
>> mega
>> > >>>> neavigation and I have about half of a module for the bottom done.
>> > >>>> The most important thing imo would be improved cross site search
>> > >>>> available on every page. That's website 101. Again, there's a
>> module
>> > >>>> ready to go if someone decides to publish it.
>> > >>>> Elin
>> > >>>> On Dec 8, 4:05 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>> > Pierre, the first 3 are JED software related, and I know that Lee
>> and
>> > >>>> others
>> > >>>> > are already discussing that.
>> > >>>> > As for 4 and 5 they can well be incorporated into the idea I
>> have.
>> > >>>> Thanks
>> > >>>> > for sharing.
>> > >>>> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Pierre Gazzola <
>> lafranc...@gmail.com>
>> > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>>> > > It would be great also to had features for jed.
>> > >>>> > > 1 feature to report exploit once reported that it could be
>> > >>>> > > automatically put on hold that extension
>> > >>>> > > 2.Also jed should be split into free and paid extension,this
>> may
>> > >>>> help
>> > >>>> > > searching jed easier maybe
>> > >>>> > > 3 A better search engine for jed. so many result are not even
>> > >>>> relevant
>> > >>>> > > to the search.
>> > >>>> > > 4 easy navigation to our by laws and the group minutes
>> > >>>> > > 5. A link directly to email with option Want to contribute to
>> the
>> > >>>> > > community
>> > >>>> > > email would have option what category they fill the form and
>> voila
>> > >>>> > > done.
>> > >>>> > > at this time you are send to a page with many links that
>> confuse
>> > >>>> > > users.
>> > >>>> > > Pierre Gazzola
>> > >>>> > > On Dec 7, 5:14 pm, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org
>> > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > Yes, we need an overall approach.
>> > >>>> > > > I'll try to note down my plan and share it sometime on this
>> list.
>> > >>>> > > > Having a busy week though ;)
>> > >>>> > > > On Dec 8, 11:09 am, Mike Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > > I like the idea of strong navigational elements at the
>> bottom,
>> > >>>> > > > > including the mini-site maps idea, if implemented site-wide
>> it
>> > >>>> could
>> > >>>> > > > > work as a phase 1 band-aid.
>> > >>>> > > > > I have found that in Academic sites or in very large
>> > >>>> organizational
>> > >>>> > > > > sites, a good start to a redesign/reworking is an A to Z
>> list of
>> > >>>> all
>> > >>>> > > > > pages that are important. (including some sort of
>> mechanism to
>> > >>>> manage
>> > >>>> > > > > and maintain this list)
>> > >>>> > > > > Would be important to have some goals, for instance, would
>> we be
>> > >>>> > > > > attempting to keep URL's consistent? etc.
>> > >>>> > > > > On Dec 6, 8:05 am, "Jen Kramer " <focused...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>> > > > > > Mini site maps at the bottom of the page are accessible
> If it is paid, it seems that we lose community involvement or do we?
> I'd like to think it will not involve money.
Stronger words are necessary here... since that will change the whole
dynamics of the management of it.
If a person submits a proposal and they win, will they lead the work?
> Yes
IMO it would be very important to include leadership and communication
methods in this proposal.
> What is the timeline for deliverables?
> What do you suggest?
Well... I can only make suggestions....
between now and 12/31 community input can be gathered.
That a preliminary scope be developed (public input gathered) starting
12/31 ending 1/5, (this is where the interested parties can help sculpt the
preliminary scope)
By 1/15, all interested parties should have submitted proposals, based on
their own criteria.
By 1/20, Community WG should have some change requests to some but not all
proposals. (where I say Community WG, maybe this could be a committee)
By 1/30, the remaining parties should send a revised proposal.
By 2/6, the Community WG should approve a single proposal (party) to lead
the complete re-design work and report back to Community WG.
work can begin promptly on a test server
(the above is just some suggestions for pre-project)
The actual work is lengthy and intensive and will require serious workload
and/or serious experience for efficient work.
The development and design work should take a couple months for high quality
work to evolve. I think it would be an amazing opportunity for several
elements to created and contributed by several parties world-wide.
A migration schedule is necessary, I can recommend that 1 major site area or
about 10% of the Joomla.org site be moved each month. The entire move will
take about a year? ( I don't know the speed at which the current site was
changed to the blue theme, but it was gradual) Although I have seen
migrations that are much faster.
If proposals will be made for a paid gig, should those proposals be managed
>> the same as the volunteer proposals?
> I'm not sure I follow this question, maybe you can explain.
This one is tricky, of course there are many individuals who are very
willing to lead this project and would do a fine job. I guess, I can't
really make an argument on this one. Volunteers make good contributions and
so do paid people. A payed person you might expect to have definite
reporting and communication, although that is not to say a volunteer would
not be able to also do this.
Ultimately, from thinking about this, who ever is leading this re-design
would be a fool not to allow public assistance, or they would have to be
some non-communicative and reclusive hermit of a designer. Probably not the
spirit of open source and community. That is why I am forseeing this
person as a group facilitator or catalyst type. Usually catalyst type
people flourish with some form of compensation. Although the right person
could probably be found as a volunteer also. So again, no opinion here.
yet :)
I believe that this could keep a sane person busy for a year, as Joomla.org
is actually many websites.
Mike Hamanaka
Website Production
Vertualize.com
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Michael Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> I'm not sure I like the idea of requesting proposals as of yet.
>> ...mainly because we have not quite identified the entire scope of the
>> work. And obviously these points are not all for Brad to answer.
>> Just some questions that come to mind...
>> This leads to questions like, RFP for a paid gig? just for credit?
>> Who is paying for this work? If Joomla is paying for this work, who needs
>> to approve that?
>> If it is paid, it seems that we lose community involvement or do we?
> I'd like to think it will not involve money.
>> If a person submits a proposal and they win, will they lead the work?
> Yes
>> Who will ultimately be responsible for the development, the actual
>> production and the end product?
> The Community Working Group
>> Is this really just a call for leadership and/or a facilitator?
> This is a discussion on a redesign of our sites.
>> Will this template work be hosted in such a place that Joomla community
>> can actively participate in that development?
> I don't anticipate that would be the case. It would be up to the
> person/organisation submitted the proposal.
>> Does the current content stay? or is there going to be some content
>> re-working?
> This RFP would not include the content, that being said, I am sure some
> content would need to be re-arranged.
>> The forums and the wiki's included? anything not included?
> Dunno, I can't think of anything else.
>> What is the timeline for deliverables?
> What do you suggest?
>> My suggestion is that the proposals be made public from the start, in
>> this case it would be nice to know who is interested in submitting a
>> proposal sooner than when they are submitted, this way the process can be
>> very open.
> I'm not sure that we should force people to put their hand up and say they
> are thinking of submitting a proposal. Also, I am not sure all proposals
> should be published, again however, happy to hear other peoples input.
>> Would also seem logical that if several people or groups are wanting to
>> donate efforts that all efforts are accepted and the exclusivity game does
>> not play in.
> To me that would be up to the people submitting the proposal. How they want
> to present themselves is up to them.
>> If proposals will be made for a paid gig, should those proposals be
>> managed the same as the volunteer proposals?
> I'm not sure I follow this question, maybe you can explain.
>> Mike Hamanaka
>> Website Production
>> Vertualize.com
>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Brad Baker <
>> brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>>> Ok.. I have a moment.. so here is my idea, well.. I'm presenting it,
>>> but a number of people have discussed it with me. Special thanks to
>>> Louis.
>>> How about we come up with a simple, but clear Request for Proposal
>>> that we can present to the community. The proposal would include new
>>> templates for our Joomla 1.5 sites, the forum (phpbb3) as well as the
>>> documentation wiki. Further to that, the proposals would include
>>> layout and integration design wise of the sites. The proposal would
>>> also include the implementation, obviously working in close
>>> cooperation with the people who currently manage our sites.
>>> I am sure there are plenty of experts with more experience than us who
>>> can come up with some really sound proposals. Lots of people come to
>>> us with ideas and things they would like changed or done better, so
>>> this would allow them to present their proposals to the community and
>>> for one to be chosen.
>>> It would require a few peoples input initially to formulate the RFP,
>>> but afterwards, more specifically to evaluate the proposals. The
>>> winning proposal would be a great resume, and our RFP would also
>>> include the way we're "reward" the winner, perhaps with a 'Credits'
>>> page on joomla.org or something similar.
>>> I'm presenting this here in a deliberately vague manner to allow for
>>> input. At the end of the day, there would be a few stipulations, such
>>> as having to incorporate the Joomla logo etc, but I think we'd receive
>>> some really solid and worthy of implementation proposals. Do you?
>>> I think this would be a wonderful way to open this part of our project
>>> up to the community and receive their input this way. We'll never keep
>>> everyone happy, but hey, I'm not even happy with the way I implement
>>> things sometimes either ;)
>>> On Dec 11, 9:36 am, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Right.. I understand that language now :P
>>> > Yip, once I get a moment I will put the general proposal I had on this
>>> list,
>>> > and will welcome your input so we can incorporate the need to appeal to
>>> more
>>> > than just English visitors. :) Thanks to you and your team.
>>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > Thanks Brad, was fishing for exactly that reply :p
>>> > > Tried to find a way of explaining the importance of us welcoming the
>>> whole
>>> > > joomla community when they visit j.org - especially those not
>>> > > understanding the english language.
>>> > > Now they will meet a strange text as above... Think we wouldnt do
>>> wrong in
>>> > > thinking in some welcoming pointers for those to some basic info
>>> about
>>> > > Joomla! - in their preferred language.
>>> > > For those not comfortable with danish, the above text says:
>>> > > Hey folks,
>>> > > Seen from an international perspective, then there is a growing
>>> demand
>>> > > for a better presentation and organisation of content related to
>>> > > translation, internationalisation and localisation.
>>> > > We from the Translation Coordination Team (TCT) would like to be a
>>> part of
>>> > > this general process of improving the overall user experience at
>>> j.org
>>> > > Ole
>>> > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Brad Baker <
>>> > > brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
>>> > >> Ole.. English please :P
>>> > >> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ole Ottosen <
>>> ole.otto...@joomla.org>wrote:
I think we're getting a little ahead of ourselves. Let's just get
other feedback before we discuss the finer details.
BTW no migrating is needed. Switching over templates can take probably
at worst talk 30 min or less, with people who know what they are
doing, even less probably.
On Dec 14, 2:10 pm, Michael Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If it is paid, it seems that we lose community involvement or do we?
> > I'd like to think it will not involve money.
> Stronger words are necessary here... since that will change the whole
> dynamics of the management of it.
> If a person submits a proposal and they win, will they lead the work?
> > Yes
> IMO it would be very important to include leadership and communication
> methods in this proposal.
> > What is the timeline for deliverables?
> > What do you suggest?
> Well... I can only make suggestions....
> between now and 12/31 community input can be gathered.
> That a preliminary scope be developed (public input gathered) starting
> 12/31 ending 1/5, (this is where the interested parties can help sculpt the
> preliminary scope)
> By 1/15, all interested parties should have submitted proposals, based on
> their own criteria.
> By 1/20, Community WG should have some change requests to some but not all
> proposals. (where I say Community WG, maybe this could be a committee)
> By 1/30, the remaining parties should send a revised proposal.
> By 2/6, the Community WG should approve a single proposal (party) to lead
> the complete re-design work and report back to Community WG.
> work can begin promptly on a test server
> (the above is just some suggestions for pre-project)
> The actual work is lengthy and intensive and will require serious workload
> and/or serious experience for efficient work.
> The development and design work should take a couple months for high quality
> work to evolve. I think it would be an amazing opportunity for several
> elements to created and contributed by several parties world-wide.
> A migration schedule is necessary, I can recommend that 1 major site area or
> about 10% of the Joomla.org site be moved each month. The entire move will
> take about a year? ( I don't know the speed at which the current site was
> changed to the blue theme, but it was gradual) Although I have seen
> migrations that are much faster.
> If proposals will be made for a paid gig, should those proposals be managed
> >> the same as the volunteer proposals?
> > I'm not sure I follow this question, maybe you can explain.
> This one is tricky, of course there are many individuals who are very
> willing to lead this project and would do a fine job. I guess, I can't
> really make an argument on this one. Volunteers make good contributions and
> so do paid people. A payed person you might expect to have definite
> reporting and communication, although that is not to say a volunteer would
> not be able to also do this.
> Ultimately, from thinking about this, who ever is leading this re-design
> would be a fool not to allow public assistance, or they would have to be
> some non-communicative and reclusive hermit of a designer. Probably not the
> spirit of open source and community. That is why I am forseeing this
> person as a group facilitator or catalyst type. Usually catalyst type
> people flourish with some form of compensation. Although the right person
> could probably be found as a volunteer also. So again, no opinion here.
> yet :)
> I believe that this could keep a sane person busy for a year, as Joomla.org
> is actually many websites.
> Mike Hamanaka
> Website Production
> Vertualize.com
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org
> > wrote:
> > Replies below.
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Michael Hamanaka <haman...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> I'm not sure I like the idea of requesting proposals as of yet.
> >> ...mainly because we have not quite identified the entire scope of the
> >> work. And obviously these points are not all for Brad to answer.
> >> Just some questions that come to mind...
> >> This leads to questions like, RFP for a paid gig? just for credit?
> >> Who is paying for this work? If Joomla is paying for this work, who needs
> >> to approve that?
> >> If it is paid, it seems that we lose community involvement or do we?
> > I'd like to think it will not involve money.
> >> If a person submits a proposal and they win, will they lead the work?
> > Yes
> >> Who will ultimately be responsible for the development, the actual
> >> production and the end product?
> > The Community Working Group
> >> Is this really just a call for leadership and/or a facilitator?
> > This is a discussion on a redesign of our sites.
> >> Will this template work be hosted in such a place that Joomla community
> >> can actively participate in that development?
> > I don't anticipate that would be the case. It would be up to the
> > person/organisation submitted the proposal.
> >> Does the current content stay? or is there going to be some content
> >> re-working?
> > This RFP would not include the content, that being said, I am sure some
> > content would need to be re-arranged.
> >> The forums and the wiki's included? anything not included?
> > Dunno, I can't think of anything else.
> >> What is the timeline for deliverables?
> > What do you suggest?
> >> My suggestion is that the proposals be made public from the start, in
> >> this case it would be nice to know who is interested in submitting a
> >> proposal sooner than when they are submitted, this way the process can be
> >> very open.
> > I'm not sure that we should force people to put their hand up and say they
> > are thinking of submitting a proposal. Also, I am not sure all proposals
> > should be published, again however, happy to hear other peoples input.
> >> Would also seem logical that if several people or groups are wanting to
> >> donate efforts that all efforts are accepted and the exclusivity game does
> >> not play in.
> > To me that would be up to the people submitting the proposal. How they want
> > to present themselves is up to them.
> >> If proposals will be made for a paid gig, should those proposals be
> >> managed the same as the volunteer proposals?
> > I'm not sure I follow this question, maybe you can explain.
> >> Mike Hamanaka
> >> Website Production
> >> Vertualize.com
> >> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Brad Baker <
> >> brad.ba...@community.joomla.org> wrote:
> >>> Ok.. I have a moment.. so here is my idea, well.. I'm presenting it,
> >>> but a number of people have discussed it with me. Special thanks to
> >>> Louis.
> >>> How about we come up with a simple, but clear Request for Proposal
> >>> that we can present to the community. The proposal would include new
> >>> templates for our Joomla 1.5 sites, the forum (phpbb3) as well as the
> >>> documentation wiki. Further to that, the proposals would include
> >>> layout and integration design wise of the sites. The proposal would
> >>> also include the implementation, obviously working in close
> >>> cooperation with the people who currently manage our sites.
> >>> I am sure there are plenty of experts with more experience than us who
> >>> can come up with some really sound proposals. Lots of people come to
> >>> us with ideas and things they would like changed or done better, so
> >>> this would allow them to present their proposals to the community and
> >>> for one to be chosen.
> >>> It would require a few peoples input initially to formulate the RFP,
> >>> but afterwards, more specifically to evaluate the proposals. The
> >>> winning proposal would be a great resume, and our RFP would also
> >>> include the way we're "reward" the winner, perhaps with a 'Credits'
> >>> page on joomla.org or something similar.
> >>> I'm presenting this here in a deliberately vague manner to allow for
> >>> input. At the end of the day, there would be a few stipulations, such
> >>> as having to incorporate the Joomla logo etc, but I think we'd receive
> >>> some really solid and worthy of implementation proposals. Do you?
> >>> I think this would be a wonderful way to open this part of our project
> >>> up to the community and receive their input this way. We'll never keep
> >>> everyone happy, but hey, I'm not even happy with the way I implement
> >>> things sometimes either ;)
> >>> On Dec 11, 9:36 am, Brad Baker <brad.ba...@community.joomla.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > Right.. I understand that language now :P
> >>> > Yip, once I get a moment I will put the general proposal I had on this
> >>> list,
> >>> > and will welcome your input so we can incorporate the need to appeal to
> >>> more
> >>> > than just English visitors. :) Thanks to you and your team.
> >>> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Ole Ottosen <ole.otto...@joomla.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > > Thanks Brad, was fishing for exactly that reply :p
> >>> > > Tried to find a way of explaining the importance of us welcoming the
> >>> whole
> >>> > > joomla community when they visit j.org - especially those not
> >>> > > understanding the english language.
> >>> > > Now they will meet a strange text as above... Think we wouldnt do
> >>> wrong in
> >>> > > thinking in some welcoming pointers for those to some basic info
> >>> about
> >>> > > Joomla! - in their preferred language.
> >>> > > For those not comfortable with danish, the above text says:
> >>> > > Hey folks,
> >>> > > Seen from an international perspective, then there is a growing
> >>> demand
> >>> > > for a better presentation and organisation of