I'm going to start moving all posts that are all 'F', 'D' or 'M' into their respective sets. Future ones will be returned to main white paper forum so that they can be looked at in the future, don't accept will be moved to rejected and merged topics will be merged as is the consensus.
Once I've done that, I'll move the top 10 to the accepted forum and we can move those from there. Some topics will expand and change as they get merged together slightly so we'll have to go through and make tasks for each topic (and subtasks).
Last but not least there are four proposals to rank as well. They've been added to the bottom of the list. If the list looks sorted now its because I've resorted them so that I can identify the ones I need to move and merge.
As far as I'm concerned these are all a green light to settle on the task goals and then you can start coding. The rest of the listed will take a bit longer to process.
Some of these will involve having the backend components refactored, so anyone that can help Ross with that would be appreciated.
Thanks once again. I think this has been a fantastic exercise and the support from the community has certainly met, if not exceeded, my expectations.
Regards, Andrew Eddie
On 15/04/2008, Sam Moffatt <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm going to start moving all posts that are all 'F', 'D' or 'M' into > their respective sets. Future ones will be returned to main white > paper forum so that they can be looked at in the future, don't accept > will be moved to rejected and merged topics will be merged as is the > consensus.
> Once I've done that, I'll move the top 10 to the accepted forum and we > can move those from there. Some topics will expand and change as they > get merged together slightly so we'll have to go through and make > tasks for each topic (and subtasks).
> Last but not least there are four proposals to rank as well. They've > been added to the bottom of the list. If the list looks sorted now its > because I've resorted them so that I can identify the ones I need to > move and merge.
All of the obvious proposals have been moved or merged respectively and the spreadsheet has been updated accordingly (you'll see a merged or moved note before the url). URL's have been updated to their new location (especially important for merged entries).
> As far as I'm concerned these are all a green light to settle on the > task goals and then you can start coding. The rest of the listed will > take a bit longer to process.
> Some of these will involve having the backend components refactored, > so anyone that can help Ross with that would be appreciated.
> Thanks once again. I think this has been a fantastic exercise and the > support from the community has certainly met, if not exceeded, my > expectations.
> Regards, > Andrew Eddie
> On 15/04/2008, Sam Moffatt <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm going to start moving all posts that are all 'F', 'D' or 'M' into > > their respective sets. Future ones will be returned to main white > > paper forum so that they can be looked at in the future, don't accept > > will be moved to rejected and merged topics will be merged as is the > > consensus.
> > Once I've done that, I'll move the top 10 to the accepted forum and we > > can move those from there. Some topics will expand and change as they > > get merged together slightly so we'll have to go through and make > > tasks for each topic (and subtasks).
> > Last but not least there are four proposals to rank as well. They've > > been added to the bottom of the list. If the list looks sorted now its > > because I've resorted them so that I can identify the ones I need to > > move and merge.
Hi, I knew this is not really fit into the topic, but I am just
wondering when are we going to upgrade our 3rd part library?
I knew we discussed this one before, but somehow I can't find the
post.
Best,
On Apr 15, 10:19 pm, "Sam Moffatt" <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All of the obvious proposals have been moved or merged respectively
> and the spreadsheet has been updated accordingly (you'll see a merged
> or moved note before the url). URL's have been updated to their new
> location (especially important for merged entries).
> Sam
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Eddie <mambob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Sam.
> > Thanks everyone who helped here.
> > First cut of the top 10, just to give everyone an idea, in reverse
> > order (10 first, counting down)
> > As far as I'm concerned these are all a green light to settle on the
> > task goals and then you can start coding. The rest of the listed will
> > take a bit longer to process.
> > Some of these will involve having the backend components refactored,
> > so anyone that can help Ross with that would be appreciated.
> > Thanks once again. I think this has been a fantastic exercise and the
> > support from the community has certainly met, if not exceeded, my
> > expectations.
> > Regards,
> > Andrew Eddie
> > On 15/04/2008, Sam Moffatt <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > I'm going to start moving all posts that are all 'F', 'D' or 'M' into
> > > their respective sets. Future ones will be returned to main white
> > > paper forum so that they can be looked at in the future, don't accept
> > > will be moved to rejected and merged topics will be merged as is the
> > > consensus.
> > > Once I've done that, I'll move the top 10 to the accepted forum and we
> > > can move those from there. Some topics will expand and change as they
> > > get merged together slightly so we'll have to go through and make
> > > tasks for each topic (and subtasks).
> > > Last but not least there are four proposals to rank as well. They've
> > > been added to the bottom of the list. If the list looks sorted now its
> > > because I've resorted them so that I can identify the ones I need to
> > > move and merge.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Ray (mihu) <rayt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I knew this is not really fit into the topic, but I am just > wondering when are we going to upgrade our 3rd part library? > I knew we discussed this one before, but somehow I can't find the > post.
> Best,
> On Apr 15, 10:19 pm, "Sam Moffatt" <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > All of the obvious proposals have been moved or merged respectively > > and the spreadsheet has been updated accordingly (you'll see a merged > > or moved note before the url). URL's have been updated to their new > > location (especially important for merged entries).
> > Sam
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Eddie <mambob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Thanks Sam.
> > > Thanks everyone who helped here.
> > > First cut of the top 10, just to give everyone an idea, in reverse > > > order (10 first, counting down)
> > > As far as I'm concerned these are all a green light to settle on the > > > task goals and then you can start coding. The rest of the listed will > > > take a bit longer to process.
> > > Some of these will involve having the backend components refactored, > > > so anyone that can help Ross with that would be appreciated.
> > > Thanks once again. I think this has been a fantastic exercise and the > > > support from the community has certainly met, if not exceeded, my > > > expectations.
> > > Regards, > > > Andrew Eddie
> > > On 15/04/2008, Sam Moffatt <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > > I'm going to start moving all posts that are all 'F', 'D' or 'M' into > > > > their respective sets. Future ones will be returned to main white > > > > paper forum so that they can be looked at in the future, don't accept > > > > will be moved to rejected and merged topics will be merged as is the > > > > consensus.
> > > > Once I've done that, I'll move the top 10 to the accepted forum and we > > > > can move those from there. Some topics will expand and change as they > > > > get merged together slightly so we'll have to go through and make > > > > tasks for each topic (and subtasks).
> > > > Last but not least there are four proposals to rank as well. They've > > > > been added to the bottom of the list. If the list looks sorted now its > > > > because I've resorted them so that I can identify the ones I need to > > > > move and merge.
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Ray (mihu) <rayt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi, I knew this is not really fit into the topic, but I am just
> > wondering when are we going to upgrade our 3rd part library?
> > I knew we discussed this one before, but somehow I can't find the
> > post.
> > Best,
> > On Apr 15, 10:19 pm, "Sam Moffatt" <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > All of the obvious proposals have been moved or merged respectively
> > > and the spreadsheet has been updated accordingly (you'll see a merged
> > > or moved note before the url). URL's have been updated to their new
> > > location (especially important for merged entries).
> > > Sam
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Eddie <mambob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Thanks Sam.
> > > > Thanks everyone who helped here.
> > > > First cut of the top 10, just to give everyone an idea, in reverse
> > > > order (10 first, counting down)
> > > > As far as I'm concerned these are all a green light to settle on the
> > > > task goals and then you can start coding. The rest of the listed will
> > > > take a bit longer to process.
> > > > Some of these will involve having the backend components refactored,
> > > > so anyone that can help Ross with that would be appreciated.
> > > > Thanks once again. I think this has been a fantastic exercise and the
> > > > support from the community has certainly met, if not exceeded, my
> > > > expectations.
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Andrew Eddie
> > > > On 15/04/2008, Sam Moffatt <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > I'm going to start moving all posts that are all 'F', 'D' or 'M' into
> > > > > their respective sets. Future ones will be returned to main white
> > > > > paper forum so that they can be looked at in the future, don't accept
> > > > > will be moved to rejected and merged topics will be merged as is the
> > > > > consensus.
> > > > > Once I've done that, I'll move the top 10 to the accepted forum and we
> > > > > can move those from there. Some topics will expand and change as they
> > > > > get merged together slightly so we'll have to go through and make
> > > > > tasks for each topic (and subtasks).
> > > > > Last but not least there are four proposals to rank as well. They've
> > > > > been added to the bottom of the list. If the list looks sorted now its
> > > > > because I've resorted them so that I can identify the ones I need to
> > > > > move and merge.
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Ray (mihu) <rayt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi, I knew this is not really fit into the topic, but I am just > > > wondering when are we going to upgrade our 3rd part library? > > > I knew we discussed this one before, but somehow I can't find the > > > post.
> > > Best,
> > > On Apr 15, 10:19 pm, "Sam Moffatt" <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > All of the obvious proposals have been moved or merged respectively > > > > and the spreadsheet has been updated accordingly (you'll see a merged > > > > or moved note before the url). URL's have been updated to their new > > > > location (especially important for merged entries).
> > > > Sam
> > > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Andrew Eddie <mambob...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Thanks Sam.
> > > > > Thanks everyone who helped here.
> > > > > First cut of the top 10, just to give everyone an idea, in reverse > > > > > order (10 first, counting down)
> > > > > As far as I'm concerned these are all a green light to settle on the > > > > > task goals and then you can start coding. The rest of the listed will > > > > > take a bit longer to process.
> > > > > Some of these will involve having the backend components refactored, > > > > > so anyone that can help Ross with that would be appreciated.
> > > > > Thanks once again. I think this has been a fantastic exercise and the > > > > > support from the community has certainly met, if not exceeded, my > > > > > expectations.
> > > > > Regards, > > > > > Andrew Eddie
> > > > > On 15/04/2008, Sam Moffatt <pasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > I'm going to start moving all posts that are all 'F', 'D' or 'M' into > > > > > > their respective sets. Future ones will be returned to main white > > > > > > paper forum so that they can be looked at in the future, don't accept > > > > > > will be moved to rejected and merged topics will be merged as is the > > > > > > consensus.
> > > > > > Once I've done that, I'll move the top 10 to the accepted forum and we > > > > > > can move those from there. Some topics will expand and change as they > > > > > > get merged together slightly so we'll have to go through and make > > > > > > tasks for each topic (and subtasks).
> > > > > > Last but not least there are four proposals to rank as well. They've > > > > > > been added to the bottom of the list. If the list looks sorted now its > > > > > > because I've resorted them so that I can identify the ones I need to > > > > > > move and merge.
|
