                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of chde...@gmail.com designates 209.85.211.164 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.211.164;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 06:05:27 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <452a6537-2e97-4cb5-b6bf-dba5425c27b4@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <4B40C189.8060202@googlemail.com> <4c37891f-9d7a-478a-9459-fecf2c01b43e@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> 
	<452a6537-2e97-4cb5-b6bf-dba5425c27b4@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Message-ID: <42e7eac8-2cbd-4354-a078-67fd777ad28b@35g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: JForm & JParameter Elements
From: Christophe Demko <chde...@gmail.com>
To: "Joomla! Framework Development" <joomla-dev-framework@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I've finished the work. It can be tested in the jform-parameter branch
(see http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=19322)

Ch.D

On 6 jan, 01:35, Christophe Demko <chde...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've created a branchhttp://joomlacode.org/svn/joomla/development/branches/jform-jparameter
> to include all these modifications.
>
> On 3 jan, 21:44, Christophe Demko <chde...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Hannes,
>
> > Would it be possible to add javascript event to form fields and to
> > form using the xml definition files (like it's already done for
> > onchange on text fields and like I propose it inhttp://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms/browse_thread/thread/f7...
>
> > Whatever, I can work on this synchronizing task.
>
> > Ch.D
>
> > On 3 jan, 17:10, Hannes Papenberg <hackwa...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi folks,
> > > while I'm in the process of delegating work here: Another task on the
> > > list to the 1.6 beta is getting all the elements available for JForm and
> > > JParameter synchronized. There are currently still a few inconsistencies
> > > and quite a few missing and maybe again someone from our eager developer
> > > community wants to take up the task and fix all these. :-) As with the
> > > JSimpleXML issue: A quick note to the list what you are working on and
> > > then send in your patch via the Joomla 1.6 Feature Patch tracker or 1.6
> > > Bug tracker:
>
> > > Feature Patch tracker:http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBr...
> > > Bug Tracker:http://joomlacode.org/gf/project/joomla/tracker/?action=TrackerItemBr...
>
> > > There are currently the following JForm elements that are inconsistent
> > > to the JParameter elements:
> > > JFormFieldCategory: filter, scope missing
> > > JElementFileList: missing as JFormFieldFileList
> > > JElementFolderList: missing as JFormFieldFolderList
> > > JElementImageList: missing as JFormFieldImageList
> > > JElementMenu: missing as JFormFieldMenu
> > > JElementMenuItem: missing as JFormFieldMenuItem
> > > JElementSQL: missing as JFormFieldSQL
> > > JElementTemplateStyle: inconsistent compared to JFormFieldTemplateStyle
> > > JElementTimzones: inconsistent compared to JFormFieldTimezone. Later is
> > > using DateTimeZone, former is hardcoded. (This one is most likely
> > > correct like this, since the legacy extension using the JParameter
> > > element would not support DateTimeZone)
> > > JElementUsergroup: not named correctly.
> > > JElementUsergroup/JFormFieldUsergroup: inconsistent
>
> > > We also have a few JForm elements, which are not present as JParameter
> > > elements. The question would be, if we should create those, since
> > > JParameter basically is deprecated in 1.6. On the other hand, there are
> > > quite a few usefull situations for these JParameter elements. Anyway,
> > > here is the list:
> > > accesslevel
> > > cachehandler
> > > checkbox
> > > combo
> > > editor
> > > file
> > > integer
> > > media
> > > rules
> > > sessionhandler
> > > user
>
> > > These two lists are not of the short kind, but please don't be
> > > intimidated. If you take up this task, you are not expected to fix all
> > > these bugs at once. Start with one or two and see if it suits you. :-)
>
> > > Thanks for all helping out with this!
>
> > > Hannes