We're trying to get consensus on whether or not Bootstrap or another framework is included in the next major release. Ron has posted a questionairre of sorts here:
One of the reasons for using a framework like this is to offer a standard for markup so that devs won't have to recreate the wheel for using ui elements not in core extensions, extensions will be more consistent and templates will "just work" with more 3PD extensions.
If you have an opinion on the subject, please weight in. Thanks!
In my opinion, there are not much reason to a big discussion if this
should or not included on J!3.0, because we have to standardize the
codes, and one of the best approach would use what is available for
the public and what they are already familiar with.
I'm +1 to include Bootstrap to Joomla.
Bootstrap offers a complete documentation of how to use the framework
and will be no excuse to developer not adopt on their extensions...
Paulo Griiettner
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andrea Tarr at Tarr Consulting
<at...@tarrconsulting.com> wrote:
> We're trying to get consensus on whether or not Bootstrap or another
> framework is included in the next major release. Ron has posted a
> questionairre of sorts here:
> One of the reasons for using a framework like this is to offer a standard
> for markup so that devs won't have to recreate the wheel for using ui
> elements not in core extensions, extensions will be more consistent and
> templates will "just work" with more 3PD extensions.
> If you have an opinion on the subject, please weight in. Thanks!
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
> To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.
On Tuesday, 1 May 2012 12:55:16 UTC-5, Paulo Griiettner wrote:
> Hello Andrea,
> In my opinion, there are not much reason to a big discussion if this > should or not included on J!3.0, because we have to standardize the > codes, and one of the best approach would use what is available for > the public and what they are already familiar with.
> I'm +1 to include Bootstrap to Joomla.
> Bootstrap offers a complete documentation of how to use the framework > and will be no excuse to developer not adopt on their extensions...
> Paulo Griiettner
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andrea Tarr at Tarr Consulting > <at...@tarrconsulting.com> wrote: > > We're trying to get consensus on whether or not Bootstrap or another > > framework is included in the next major release. Ron has posted a > > questionairre of sorts here:
> > One of the reasons for using a framework like this is to offer a > standard > > for markup so that devs won't have to recreate the wheel for using ui > > elements not in core extensions, extensions will be more consistent and > > templates will "just work" with more 3PD extensions.
> > If you have an opinion on the subject, please weight in. Thanks!
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "Joomla! CMS Development" group. > > To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
> On Tuesday, 1 May 2012 12:55:16 UTC-5, Paulo Griiettner wrote:
>> Hello Andrea,
>> In my opinion, there are not much reason to a big discussion if this
>> should or not included on J!3.0, because we have to standardize the
>> codes, and one of the best approach would use what is available for
>> the public and what they are already familiar with.
>> I'm +1 to include Bootstrap to Joomla.
>> Bootstrap offers a complete documentation of how to use the framework
>> and will be no excuse to developer not adopt on their extensions...
>> Paulo Griiettner
>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Andrea Tarr at Tarr Consulting
>> <at...@tarrconsulting.com> wrote:
>> > We're trying to get consensus on whether or not Bootstrap or another
>> > framework is included in the next major release. Ron has posted a
>> > questionairre of sorts here:
>> > One of the reasons for using a framework like this is to offer a
>> > standard
>> > for markup so that devs won't have to recreate the wheel for using ui
>> > elements not in core extensions, extensions will be more consistent and
>> > templates will "just work" with more 3PD extensions.
>> > If you have an opinion on the subject, please weight in. Thanks!
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
>> > To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Joomla! CMS Development" group.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/joomla-dev-cms/-/uAj3xSlDcIIJ.
> To post to this group, send an email to joomla-dev-cms@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> joomla-dev-cms+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/joomla-dev-cms?hl=en-GB.
