So said Canadian Economics Professor Ross McKitrick in 2009 when asked by a journalist for his

Ohh sorry, I'm thinking about Harmony... Harmony combines johnson and envjs... On Mon, Feb 7,

> Ruby version is 1.9.1-p429, At last test, Johnson isn't happy with any 1.9 branch. Threads

We're still not out of the woods with the unstable branch. While it passes the johnson tests, it

Dear Johnson developers and users, it is me again. I think last time my explanation was a bit

> The lack of information when Johnson spits out a backtrace is > completely maddening This is

> Is it possible to run untrusted code inside of Johnson Sandboxing would be nice, but I for one

Thanks Steven, I will look that. I will let you know about my results. Manuel Vidaurre +52 [33]

Steven, Matthew, Thank you very much for your precisions. I guess that as said Matthew, option 2 was

Awesome. Thanks On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Steven Parkes <smpa...@smparkes.net> wrote:

> I am working with Rails 3 and Ruby 1.9.1 and wondering what the status > for ruby 1.9.1

I wrote up the experience (and a few other things) at http://rdrake98.posterous.com/ossat-nodejs-and-

Anyone know enough about REE (and Johnson) to know if there are any fundamental reason it shouldn

On Mar 23, 2010, at 8:53 AM, Steven Parkes wrote: > The only thing I was toying with was the Great

For posterity: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=536161

> I don't have a problem with that, what are you overriding 'em for? Just load. I do a

On Mar 10, 2010, at 9:28 AM, TJH wrote: > gem "hoe", "~> 2.3" > gem

On Mar 2, 2010, at Mar 2,3:08 PM , Matt Wynne wrote: > Great! Any benchmarks on how fast it is? A

Matthew helped me figure out where/fix an exception was causing the segv. I could have removed the

Well, I'm getting together a nice little set of tools for tracing every freaking setjmp/longjmp

Wow, memprof is great stuff. I have a case I don't really understand, though. (On 1.8.7-p249) I

I'd like to do a pre2 soon/today; primarily to get the GC issue fixed but also a couple of other

I guess there's good reason the JIT is turned off in 64 bit builds. From the latest mozilla-

On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Steven Parkes <smpa...@smparkes.net> wrote: > > On Feb

[Adding the envjs and johnson lists, rather than posting separately. This thread is about envjs

On Feb 16, 2010, at 10:02 PM, Aaron Patterson wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:56 PM, John

On Feb 16, 2010, at Feb 16,2:51 PM , Steven Parkes wrote: > Okay, looks like I can force a core

I've been thinking about a pre1: it would include SM from FF3.6 and a fix to the way split

On Feb 3, 2010, at Feb 3,7:28 PM , Steven Parkes wrote: > There appears to be a regression between

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Steven Parkes <smpa...@smparkes.net> wrote: > We have the