From: Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 09:05:33 -0800
Local: Wed, Dec 14 2011 12:05 pm
Subject: Re: Virtualbox implementation
Thanks for the update, Andrei. and kudos to you and Mattias for
carrying this forward. Thanks for the info about what works vs doesn't, and bringing comments inline. On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Andrea <andrea.tu...@gmail.com> wrote: particularly where this is modeled in a way that we can switch to API later. > Since a bunch of months me, Adrian and Mattias are working hard to release > the jclouds virtualbox api. > I've finally discovered that vbox CLI used vbox API to offer all the > In particular: > VirtualBoxManager.getSessionObject().getConsole().getGuest().executeProcess (execName, as IP address info surely must be in a domain object somewhere, right? In general, I get the idea, though: progress before perfection. I might consider making a version of RunScriptOnNode that works with > Unfortunately it will not help us using: > VirtualBoxManager.getSessionObject().getConsole().getGuest().updateGuestAdd itions(source, > Ciao, > -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||