You can make it so the verify phase does this. Docs don't help, and we already have a page for eclipse development. If we want to help with code style, setup check style and add it to the verify phase. I can work on this over the weekend if people want help.
Docs don't help for code style, fail the build.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jclouds-dev" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jclouds-dev/-/ttdk8sB5Vj0J.
To post to this group, send email to jclou...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jclouds-dev...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jclouds-dev?hl=en.
Fyi: me and Gaul discussed in IRC and it sounds like check style is the best route. It provides support for many IDEs including eclipse and allows us to move in the direction of enforcing this at build instead of burdening the reviewer.
I can look at reformatting changes, any help is appreciated.
Those are complementary things.
Making the build fail is more radical, and I don't know if it would introduce too much innecessary noise to pull requests (don't know if there is a need to be so strict on formatting right now). Anyway, I don't have a strong opinion on this.
Having the stuff documented in the site, however, is always good (there is no reason for not documenting). I think having a reference page will help us centralising the info and people setting up the environment before breaking the build.
Good! I can help in reformatting too.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jclouds-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to jclou...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jclouds-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.