Updated patches ... exiftool elimination and one small Gtk issue

[matej]

I have attached refreshed patches to bug #129 and created a new bug #186. Please apply.

Matěj

[matej]

Also added a patch for http://code.google.com/p/jbrout/issues/detail?id=56 (freeDesktop directories)

[mana...@gmail.com]

so ... #56 & #129 & #186

thanks matej

I will try to do my best in the next days

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:04, matej <mc...@redhat.com> wrote:

Also added a patch for http://code.google.com/p/jbrout/issues/detail?id=56 (freeDesktop directories)

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jBrout" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jbrout/-/Hu1Px1mBxOgJ.

To post to this group, send email to jbr...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jbrout+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jbrout?hl=en.

[matej]

I think we have also fix for #155

[Rob Wallace]

I have applied the below mentioned patches.  

On 5 July 2011 23:45, matej <mc...@redhat.com> wrote:

I think we have also fix for #155

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jBrout" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jbrout/-/mli2-o82IwYJ.

[mana...@gmail.com]

Very thanks to you, rob !

and thanks again matej for your patch

[Matěj Cepl]

Dne 6.7.2011 10:03, mana...@gmail.com napsal(a):

> Very thanks to you, rob !
> and thanks again matej for your patch

Just to relieve remaining non-standard files I have in Fedora pakage,
these are:

* jbrout-Makefile ... because every project should have Makefile; it's
using
* jbrout-install.sh ... because I am noob and cannot make complicated
find directly in Makefile
* jbrout.desktop ... desktop file for jbrout which complies with
Freedesktop standards
* jbrout-usr_bin ... simple shellscript for running jbrout; should go
to /usr/bin

All of them are probably Uinux specific, but I don't think they hurt
Windows users just by having them there.

What do you think?

Matěj

[matej]

I don't like your r331 (pyexiv2 warning). pyexiv2 0.3.* is now officially stable (http://tilloy.net/dev/pyexiv2/download.html), 0.1.* is obsolete and not supported anymore. What exactly you are waiting for?

Best,

Matěj

[Rob Wallace]

Hi

I am happy to remove the warning if the general consensus is that jBrout using pyexiv2-0.3 is now stable, the goal of r331 was to remove the printing to the terminal of the warning every time anything was done with pyexiv2 and only print the warning once on start up.  

Regards

Rob

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jBrout" group.

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jbrout/-/G7uJGcbTcUIJ.

[Matěj Cepl]

On Po 11. červenec 2011, 23:49:42 CEST, Rob Wallace wrote:
> I am happy to remove the warning if the general consensus is that jBrout
> using pyexiv2-0.3 is now stable,

We have had in Fedora pyexiv2 packaged for quite some time and I have
never expected any serious issue with it. Couple of minor issues I had
(http://is.gd/DQYPAf) were promptly resolved by upstream before 0.3 has
been released.

I think removing this message and accepting pyexiv2 as stable is long
overdue (despite long long delay of Debian packagers on this).

Best,

Matěj

[Francois Chartier]

Thanks for all the good work. It's unfortunate that pyexiv2 is packaged only with the most recent distributions... but I succeeded to compile it on my ubuntu 9.10 (yes, I know it's not supported anymore, but it's the only one where wifi seems to work correctly).

I noticed then that R334 (issue #56 on freedesktop) breaks jbrout on this version because it needs python-gobject 2.18 and I only have 2.16.1. I don't know which versions are packaged with different distributions of linux, but we should be aware that it doesn't work with older systems (dapper and hardy for linux). Luckily, it's easy to revert conf.py only.

[Mack]