Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion OSGi on the Server Side and the matter of the WOO
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Neil Bartlett  
View profile  
 More options Jan 26 2008, 3:55 am
From: Neil Bartlett <njbartl...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Jan 26 2008 3:55 am
Subject: Re: OSGi on the Server Side and the matter of the WOO
Some more evidence for you:

* IBM WebSphere Application Server is already based on an OSGi runtime
(specifically Eclipse Equinox).

* BEA committed a while back to developing ALL of their new products
on OSGi. In their marketing literature they refer to the BEA "micro
Services Architecture" or mSA, which is essentially OSGi plus some
utilities on top. An internal source at BEA told me that eventually
their flagship product, WebLogic Application Server, would probably be
converted to OSGi.

* BEA's strategy is unlikely to change after the acquisition by
Oracle, since Oracle are also strong supporters of OSGi. They are on
the OSGi Enterprise Expert Group, and their EclipseLink product offers
persistence services for OSGi.

* JBoss uses OSGi in their ESB platform. Another open source ESB,
Mule, is aiming to convert to OSGi in a future version.

* As you noted, SpringSource/Interface21 are supporters. In his blog,
Rod Johnson stated his intention to push the JEE 6 expert group
towards the use of OSGi for delivering modularity in JEE.

* Last year, even Sun joined the OSGi Alliance. In fact they RE-
joined, since they were founding members.

However, I wouldn't say that these developments are negative for the
"JSR crowd". Remember that OSGi R4.1 has been standardised under the
JCP via JSR 291 (for Java SE) and JSR 232 (for Java ME). OSGi itself
began life as JSR 008.

Regards
Neil

On Jan 26, 1:14 am, RogerV <rog...@qwest.net> wrote:

> Intimations that the WOO for OSGi may indeed be 2008:

> Michael Coté, an industry analyst with RedMonk, reports that the
> Eclipse foundation is targeting moving OSGi into the server
> application environment:

> OSGi in Java - Eclipse Equinox Screencast and Video Serieshttp://www.redmonk.com/cote/2008/01/17/osgi-in-java-eclipse-equinox-s...

> "What's new, and very much in the cards for 2008 is Eclipse moving
> into the server side, into an even more tooling and framework position
> for the Java world."

> "At the core of their strategy is OSGi"

> Then there is the Spring Framework itself that is making an OSGi move
> with a v1.0 release:

> Spring Dynamic Modules for OSGi: simplified development of OSGi
> applicationshttp://www.infoq.com/news/2008/01/spring-dm

> So there we have two big movers and shakers of the Java platform world
> (Eclipse and Spring) pushing OSGi for server-side enterprise
> development.

> Looks like once again the JSR crowd are going to be too late to the
> party.

> Oh, here is an interesting intro article describing OSGi as "SOA" for
> the internal structure of an app:

> Of Programming and Architecture: SOA in a JVMhttp://blogs.nagarro.net/kayser/soa-in-a-jvm/


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google