Received: by 10.52.179.8 with SMTP id dc8mr633827vdc.4.1319311627706;
        Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: javaposse@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.220.149.17 with SMTP id r17ls10390506vcv.0.gmail; Sat, 22 Oct
 2011 12:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.178.134 with SMTP id bm6mr306909vcb.36.1319311622908;
        Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 12:27:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: Simon Ochsenreither <simon.ochsenreit...@googlemail.com>
Reply-To: javaposse@googlegroups.com
To: javaposse@googlegroups.com
Message-ID: <2321032.1467.1319311622396.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqgd7>
In-Reply-To: <28218404.687.1319307635717.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqp37>
References: <11825885.931.1319138826692.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqkb19>
 <28218404.687.1319307635717.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqp37>
Subject: Re: Fork/Join criticism
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1465_25026288.1319311622395"

------=_Part_1465_25026288.1319311622395
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_1466_12028784.1319311622395"

------=_Part_1466_12028784.1319311622395
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I would love to see an implementation backing Scala's parallel collections 
as a proof of concept.
It should be even possible to have it as drop-in replacement because the 
parallelization mechanics are not exposed to the user.

What do you think? Would love to see some performance numbers ...

------=_Part_1466_12028784.1319311622395
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I would love to see an implementation backing Scala's parallel collections as a proof of concept.<br>It should be even possible to have it as drop-in replacement because the parallelization mechanics are not exposed to the user.<br><br>What do you think? Would love to see some performance numbers ...<br>
------=_Part_1466_12028784.1319311622395--

------=_Part_1465_25026288.1319311622395--