No more JME on Meego?

5 views
Skip to first unread message

fabrizio...@tidalwave.it

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 10:25:27 AM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
 
--
Fabrizio Giudici, Ph.D. - Java Architect, Project Manager
Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."

Manfred Moser

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 5:33:52 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
> http://www.dzone.com/links/r/nokia_makes_qt_the_sole_application_development_f.html

JME is as good as dead. Everything/everybody is moving away from it. I
find it ironic that Rich Green is making this announcement..

manfred

Russel Winder

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 5:50:12 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com

Your assertion appears to have only contrary evidence given the number
of new clients I have requesting Java ME training as they are creating
new products for Java ME platforms.

--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel...@ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@russel.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder

signature.asc

phil swenson

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 6:02:39 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
Seems like Nokia just put the final nail in the coffin to me. Once
you eliminate Symbian, what's left?

Russel Winder

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 6:42:27 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:02 -0600, phil swenson wrote:
> Seems like Nokia just put the final nail in the coffin to me. Once
> you eliminate Symbian, what's left?

I have no idea. Personally I would just go with Java SE Embedded, but
clients want Java ME training so who am I to object to income?

signature.asc

Manfred Moser

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 6:51:53 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 14:33 -0700, Manfred Moser wrote:
>> > http://www.dzone.com/links/r/nokia_makes_qt_the_sole_application_development_f.html
>>
>> JME is as good as dead. Everything/everybody is moving away from it. I
>> find it ironic that Rich Green is making this announcement..
>
> Your assertion appears to have only contrary evidence given the number
> of new clients I have requesting Java ME training as they are creating
> new products for Java ME platforms.

Very interesting. What phones will they be installed on? There will be
less and less JME phones around if the trend continues.. are you sure
those are not just legacy requests? I would be glad if JME gets revived
and modernized but in my world I here barely anything about it.

manfred

Derek Munneke

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 6:54:51 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com

S40 still outsells iOS and Android combined by a factor of 4.

Also Bada still has a kvm, but Samsung wont sell j2me apps via their app store.

Smart phones are still a small slice (<20%) of the overall market, albiet the slice spending the most; but smartphone growth is also stimulating the feature phone apps market.

Targeting s40 only on Ovi will make j2me much more accessible for independent developers by eleminating the porting hell.

/derek

On 22 Oct 2010 08:32, "phil swenson" <phil.s...@gmail.com> wrote:

Fabrizio Giudici

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 6:59:41 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com, Russel Winder
On 10/22/10 00:42 , Russel Winder wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:02 -0600, phil swenson wrote:
>> Seems like Nokia just put the final nail in the coffin to me. Once
>> you eliminate Symbian, what's left?
> I have no idea. Personally I would just go with Java SE Embedded, but
> clients want Java ME training so who am I to object to income?
>
Well, the two things are not contradictory: there are billions of JME
phones out there and for sure it makes sense to develop on them for the
immediate and still for a few time. But the point is perspective: as
Phil said, if Nokia goes, there's basically only RIM.

--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager


Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."

java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
Fabrizio...@tidalwave.it

Manfred Moser

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 7:06:54 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
> On 10/22/10 00:42 , Russel Winder wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 16:02 -0600, phil swenson wrote:
>>> Seems like Nokia just put the final nail in the coffin to me. Once
>>> you eliminate Symbian, what's left?
>> I have no idea. Personally I would just go with Java SE Embedded, but
>> clients want Java ME training so who am I to object to income?
>>
> Well, the two things are not contradictory: there are billions of JME
> phones out there and for sure it makes sense to develop on them for the
> immediate and still for a few time. But the point is perspective: as
> Phil said, if Nokia goes, there's basically only RIM.

And RIM is not exactly bringing out hot new phones everybody is looking
for, not to mention there PR troubles with their encryption (even if that
is unjustified).

manfred

Miroslav Pokorny

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 7:07:16 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
Without actually having any stats i would say JME is bigger than ever, due to the adoption of simple non smart phones in places outside the North American/Western Europe. Africa, India and so on are very big places with lots of people, not everyone can afford an iphone.

Russel Winder

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 7:21:27 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:51 -0700, Manfred Moser wrote:
[ . . . ]

> Very interesting. What phones will they be installed on? There will be
> less and less JME phones around if the trend continues.. are you sure
> those are not just legacy requests? I would be glad if JME gets revived
> and modernized but in my world I here barely anything about it.

It is not totally clear what the platforms are, but I suspect all
Blackberry. I had thought I had given my last Java ME training course
two years ago, but all of a sudden two in the last month.

signature.asc

Cédric Beust ♔

unread,
Oct 21, 2010, 9:52:43 PM10/21/10
to java...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Russel Winder <rus...@russel.org.uk> wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 15:51 -0700, Manfred Moser wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Very interesting. What phones will they be installed on? There will be
> less and less JME phones around if the trend continues.. are you sure
> those are not just legacy requests? I would be glad if JME gets revived
> and modernized but in my world I here barely anything about it.

It is not totally clear what the platforms are, but I suspect all
Blackberry.  I had thought I had given my last Java ME training course
two years ago, but all of a sudden two in the last month.

Aren't they just statistical anomalies, though?

Because my interpretation is that yes, a lot of devices are currently running but it's pretty much a dying technology that is not going to see a lot of new developments.

--
Cédric


Carl Jokl

unread,
Oct 22, 2010, 4:43:05 AM10/22/10
to The Java Posse
I wish I knew what was going on with JavaME. The fact that late last
year MIDP 3.0 was finalised made me think it would be bit pointless
to have a new version of MIDP if no-one was interested in JavaME. I
don't think JavaME is going to attract much media attention and I do
think it is a degree of decline. The question is whether it is
declining as fast as some are making out as even this thread seems to
be full of disagreement on whether it is in decline.

For all the problems and limitations of JavaME, it did at least work
based on a committee of members deciding what would go into it. With
Android, in spite of all the posturing about openness it seems to me
that Google is the only one directing the platform. That said, this
approach worked for Windows Mobile in the past and in a more extreme
sense with iOS (though in the latter case it only runs on one
manufacturers hardware).

Given that I still have an unfinished JavaME project in the pipeline,
it is not so reassuring when people keep saying JavaME is dead.

Fabrizio Giudici

unread,
Oct 22, 2010, 5:05:41 AM10/22/10
to java...@googlegroups.com, Carl Jokl
On 10/22/10 10:43 , Carl Jokl wrote:
> Given that I still have an unfinished JavaME project in the pipeline,
> it is not so reassuring when people keep saying JavaME is dead.
>
The biggest issue to me is that we're again in a highly fragmented
mobile world as in the pre-JME times. Even ignoring iPhone, and ignoring
that supporting the same app for Android and JME is a non trivial thing,
you're going to leave out the future top products by Nokia. And you'd
have to revert to C++ to support them. Not good at all.

Of course, I think that there are high chances that the latest decision
from Nokia is the n-th step in a sequence of disastrous decisions and
that Meego will be a failure. So, perhaps they will have to revert to
another solution (whose name starts with A) sooner or later.

--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager


Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere."

java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people
Fabrizio...@tidalwave.it

ebresie

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 5:21:48 PM10/26/10
to The Java Posse
There's still always phoneME (open sourced JavaME) :-)

https://phoneme.dev.java.net/

Eric
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages