You cannot post messages because only members can post, and you are not currently a member.
|
Veja o código GSP no seu browser
|
| |
El austriaco Siegfried Puchbauer nos presenta un simples pero útil
bookmarklet que permite visualizar en el navegador web el código GSP
de la aplicación que estemos desarrollando.
[link]
|
|
Are Java Developers, Architects, and Technical Managers Becoming Java Dinosaurs?
|
| |
With the rapid evolution that Java and open source frameworks have made since the release of J2EE, enterprise Java IT seems to be producing too many Java dinosaurs. Developers, technical managers, or architects who no longer pursue their technical skills don't understand the evolution of JEE in comparison to J2EE, persistence frameworks, IOC frameworks, Web frameworks,... more »
|
|
ImageMagick con Grails
|
| |
Kevin Burke: "I'll admit it, I used ImageMagick for my image manipulation instead of Java and I'll show you how I did it.": * [link] * *"ImageMagick(R) <[link]>is a software suite to create, edit, and compose bitmap images. It can read, convert and... more »
|
|
Ruby on Grails?
|
| |
"Ruby on Grails? Why the hell not?" Charles Nutter: *I've spent some time this weekend looking over the Grails<[link]>codebase. After a truly gigantic checkout (Grails bundles production JARs for all the libraries it integrates) and after swimming through a substantial, single-project sea of source files, I think I'm starting to... more »
|
|
Groovy irá reemplazar Java? Groovy irá substituir Java?
|
| |
"We are not in the 'Java is dead, a Ruby/Scala/x language is here to kill it' camp. Groovy is currently the only language that allows true polyglot programming without the pain of context switching, its the act of using it together with Java that makes it so powerful." -- Graeme Rocher<[link]><[link]>... more »
|
|
On Grails, Trails and Sails
|
| |
At JavaOne this year, there was a presentation on "Grails, Trails and
Sails - Rails Through a Coffee Filter". There's been a few comments on
it scattered in various blog posts (at least
[link]
and [link]), so it seems fitting to have some... more »
|
|
|