Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Groovy | Grails
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Are Java Developers, Architects, and Technical Managers Becoming Java Dinosaurs?
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Ivan Garcia  
View profile  
 More options Aug 7 2008, 4:51 am
From: "Ivan Garcia" <ivanfon...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:51:59 +0200
Local: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 4:51 am
Subject: Are Java Developers, Architects, and Technical Managers Becoming Java Dinosaurs?
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

With the rapid evolution that Java and open source frameworks have made
since the release of J2EE, enterprise Java IT seems to be producing too many
Java dinosaurs. Developers, technical managers, or architects who no longer
pursue their technical skills don't understand the evolution of JEE in
comparison to J2EE, persistence frameworks, IOC frameworks, Web frameworks,
or Web 2.0 and its effects on enterprise Java. Yet decisions are made based
on out-of-date J2EE experience.

To understand this better, we need to understand relevance. Wikipedia
defines relevance (the philosophical concept of relevance) as "a term used
to describe how pertinent, connected, or applicable some information is to a
given matter." We need to ask ourselves the following questions:

   - Are we relevant?
   - Do we need to be relevant?
   - What are the implications of not being relevant?
   - How do we stay relevant?

Por Jay Blanton <http://java.sys-con.com/author/7568>

   - *Continuar lendo <http://java.sys-con.com/node/635225>*


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google