-+ Tatu +-
-+ Tatu +-
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "java-serialization-benchmarking" group.
To post to this group, send email to java-serializat...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to java-serialization-be...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/java-serialization-benchmarking?hl=en.
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Tatu Saloranta <tsalo...@gmail.com> wrote:Ok, after fighting with lack of documentation and odd crashes with
msgpack, I managed to get codec to work.
So it might make sense to re-run test suite to get results for couple
of more backends (at least gson/streaming and msgpack are new).Got exceptions trying to run.
Numbers I saw indicated msgpack was bit slower than protobuf, about
same as Thrift (maybe slightly faster).
This is better than last I checked 4 months ago, when msgpack was
actually slower than other binary codecs.
There are faster options like Kryo, and various codecs Protostuff
provides, so speed does not seem to be a strong reason to use msgpack;
although like many codecs (json, avro, fastest xml codecs also
qualify) it is certainly fast enough for most use cases.
-+ Tatu +-
-+ Tatu +-