Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Jaql Developers
Home
+ new post
About this group
Join this group
Functional branch
Options
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
   2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Rainer Gemulla  
View profile  
 More options Sep 17 2009, 8:30 pm
From: Rainer Gemulla <Rainer.Gemulla.J...@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:30:38 -0700
Local: Thurs, Sep 17 2009 8:30 pm
Subject: Functional branch
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Any thoughts on whether or not to merge the functional branch back into
the trunk? Pro is that we get the improvements in functions, get rid of
$, and get modules. Con is that we still did not organize Jaql's builtin
functions into modules; this would be a good opportunity to do so.

Rainer


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Vuk Erecegovac  
View profile  
 More options Sep 17 2009, 9:48 pm
From: Vuk Erecegovac <vuk.ercego...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:48:04 -0700
Local: Thurs, Sep 17 2009 9:48 pm
Subject: Re: Functional branch
Print | Individual message | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author

This change is backwards compatible with current queries so it seems
beneficial to merge back in at this point. It would be nice to figure out a
way to maintain backwards compatibility for the proposed builtin modules but
we may not get there-- lets make a separate branch for this purpose.

Thanks!

Vuk

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Rainer Gemulla
<Rainer.Gemulla.J...@gmx.de>wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2013 Google