Message from discussion
¿I´m the only one who think on integrating Jaiku and Google Buzz Api?
X-BeenThere: jaikuengine-discuss@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.150.18.12 with SMTP id 12ls495802ybr.0.p; Wed, 10 Feb 2010
06:23:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.130.6 with SMTP id c6mr1601033ybd.29.1265811790805;
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.150.130.6 with SMTP id c6mr1601032ybd.29.1265811790775;
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <ymbr...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yx0-f163.google.com (mail-yx0-f163.google.com [209.85.210.163])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24si136771yxe.11.2010.02.10.06.23.10;
Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ymbr...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.163 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.163;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ymbr...@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.163 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ymbr...@gmail.com
Received: by yxe35 with SMTP id 35so99684yxe.2
for <jaikuengine-discuss@googlegroups.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:23:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.59.4 with SMTP id h4mr40899yba.74.1265811790726; Wed, 10
Feb 2010 06:23:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 06:23:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <316cc86c-682d-416a-be6b-2c99d1b2e9f8@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 80.223.214.156
References: <316cc86c-682d-416a-be6b-2c99d1b2e9f8@u9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X; U; en) Presto/2.2.15
Version/10.10,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <d5a8b6e7-9de8-4899-b487-dca63e2db96b@l26g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_=BFI=B4m_the_only_one_who_think_on_integrating_Jai?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?ku_and_Google_Buzz_Api=3F?=
From: mike bradshaw <ymbr...@gmail.com>
To: jaikuengine-discuss <jaikuengine-discuss@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 9, 11:21=A0pm, Carl Clausewitz <vonham...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe this is what Jaiku needs to be a real advantage on Microblogging
> cloud...
I understand there has been at least some discussion (not sure how
much code there is) for Jaiku to make use of PubSubHubbub, and Jyri's
blog (http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2010/02/the-buzz-is-out.html)
makes it clear that Jaiku was a major inspiration for Buzz.
There have been a couple of threads on Jaiku already about this, and
an initial code patch has been submitted for checking (see this thread
http://www.jaiku.com/channel/jaikuengine/presence/6b505df466c54c838f17215f7=
a0ff4f2
)