is there any smart way for making a run configuration for compiling a test
package. At the moment, the installer skeleton is taken from lib/installer.jar
(Packager.writeSkeletonInstaller()) and not from the freshly compiled classes
from rebuilding the workspace after local changes.
Thus, there is always a two-phase run configuration necessary at the moment_
1. Creating the skeleton jars (using Ant and build.xml)
2. Compiling
Does anyone have a better solution?
BTW: I don't like the way how native IzPack jars and 3rd-party jars are mixed
together under libs, they should be separated.
I would appreciate a smarter way for creating the skeleton for debugging
purposes, maybe I'll find some... ;-)
R.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Not so efficient but does the job within the given circumstances.
On Tuesday 24 November 2009 11:47:28 you wrote:
> ...
> is there any smart way for making a run configuration for compiling a test
> package. At the moment, the installer skeleton is taken from
> lib/installer.jar (Packager.writeSkeletonInstaller()) and not from the
> freshly compiled classes from rebuilding the workspace after local
> changes.
>
> Thus, there is always a two-phase run configuration necessary at the
> moment_ 1. Creating the skeleton jars (using Ant and build.xml)
> 2. Compiling
>
> Does anyone have a better solution?
> ...