Listening to her reactions to the prosecuting attorney the other day
it became obvious that allowing her to testify was a huge mistake,in
that it allowed the public to see the real Amanda
Knox,defiant,irritable and angry at having the slightest thing she
said disputed. In short,a person one would be unwise to cross,as
Meredith found out to her cost.
Another Mistake:- She and her family seem to me to regard Italy as
some kind of backward third world country,packed with peasants and a
primitive legal system,Peruglians in particular...but is it wise to
make this public,via a desperate defense team?
I think that meredith was simply suicided.
> Listening to her reactions to the prosecuting attorney the other day
> it became obvious that allowing her to testify was a huge mistake,in
> that it allowed the public to see the real Amanda
> Knox,defiant,irritable and angry at having the slightest thing she
> said disputed. In short,a person one would be unwise to cross,as
> Meredith found out to her cost.
> Another Mistake:- She and her family seem to me to regard Italy as
> some kind of backward third world country,packed with peasants and a
> primitive legal system,Peruglians in particular...but is it wise to
> make this public,via a desperate defense team?
Probably not, does it matter?
Her likelihood to be acquited as "unguilty" certainly does not depend
on her family's view of the italian legal system...
as her angryness, her irritableness and so on
have nothing to do with her chances to play this trial as better.
She has been charged for *murder*.
Public role is nothing, in a court.
More sophysticated things are involved in the game.
--
questo articolo e` stato inviato via web dal servizio gratuito
http://www.newsland.it/news segnala gli abusi ad ab...@newsland.it
> Porteus ha scritto:
> > Listening to her reactions to the prosecuting attorney the other day
> > it became obvious that allowing her to testify was a huge mistake,in
> > that it allowed the public to see the real Amanda
> > Knox,defiant,irritable and angry at having the slightest thing she
> > said disputed. In short,a person one would be unwise to cross,as
> > Meredith found out to her cost.
> > Another Mistake:- She and her family seem to me to regard Italy as
> > some kind of backward third world country,packed with peasants and a
> > primitive legal system,Peruglians in particular...but is it wise to
> > make this public,via a desperate defense team?
> Probably not, does it matter?
> Her likelihood to be acquited as "unguilty" certainly does not depend
> on her family's view of the italian legal system...
> as her angryness, her irritableness and so on
> have nothing to do with her chances to play this trial as better.
> She has been charged for *murder*.
> Public role is nothing, in a court.
> More sophysticated things are involved in the game.
.. and be patient:
her sexy calendar is coming soon!