Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Haiku competition: best ineligible e...
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jeremy  
View profile  
 More options Nov 2, 4:17 pm
From: Jeremy <j...@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 2 2009 4:17 pm
Subject: [The IPKat - for IP in a changing world] Haiku competition: best ineligible e...

Apart from the serious entries to the Copying Without Infringing
competition (here), the IPKat received some hilarious and not always
entirely publishable material from a number of creative readers who
felt (i) unduly restricted by the haiku format, (ii) unduly restricted
by the subject matter on offer or (iii) generally inspired to write
greater things. Among these offerings were the following:

From Sandra Beelaard (Advocaat, De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
N.V.: "Well, not really a Haiku, but it was fun nonetheless")
To infringe, or not to infringe: that is the question:
Whether keywords are the domain controlled
Exclusively by rightholders' whims,
Or the prerogatives of advertisers' lust,
And by an answer end it? To question, to litigate;
No more; and by the answer to say we end
The darkness of uncertainty arising
From the depths of Luxembourg, 'tis an answer
Devoutly to be wish'd. To question, to litigate;
To litigate: perchance to reason: ay, there's the rub;
For in that trial what reason may befall
Raising yet another question, only to
Await another ruling: there's the aspect
That makes European trademark law so complex.
In Haiko style that would be:

To infringe
Or not to infringe
That's the questionFrom Dr Stephen Wintersgill (IP Manager, University
of Central Lancashire) comes a haiku which, while not falling within
one of the competition categories, would probably win the support of a
number of judges in the Court of Justice of the European Communities,
and reflect the sentiment of many other good folk, when he writes
Football league fixtures
protected database rights
enforceable? My arse.Straight from the heart, that one.

Finally, Shabtai Atlow (patent attorney, NDS) writes "OK, it isn’t your
contest. And it isn’t a haiku, and I didn’t write it, but ...". Then,
after reminding us of the famous verse concerning Tweedledum and
Tweedledee, he quotes:Bud-o-var and Bud-e-J
Agreed to have a battle;
For Bud-o-var said Bud-e-J
Had spoiled his nice new rattle.

Just then flew down a monstrous Robin,
As black as judge’s robes;
Which frightened both the heroes so,
They quite forgot their quarrel.Thanks, all of you, for your efforts!

--
Posted By Jeremy to The IPKat - for IP in a changing world on
11/02/2009 09:11:00 PM


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google