Is this a change in behaviour? Previously the algorithm seemed to be
matching reactants sequentially which in the case of a reaction with
only 1 product would make the problem only order N.
If every permutation does need to be considered i.e. the problem is N!
then throwing an exception if there are too many reactants/products
and AAM is performed could be an answer although this form of AAM
should probably not be the default.
On Jun 29, 9:33 am, Savelyev Alexander <
asavel...@ggasoftware.com>
wrote: