Euphorbia species for ID 3/01/2010

[Satish Phadke]

This is a tiny herb.
Must be very common. Got a chance to see its flowers. Actually the intricate nature of the flowers was appreciated on zooming the macro. Is it Chamaesyce hypericifolia. I could find Dinesh Valke's photo on Flickr matching this one.
Dr Satish Phadke

[shrikant ingalhalikar]

This is herb with erect stem, leaves opposite and with stipules.
Involucres on axillary pedunculate cymes. I have identified this as
Euphorbia zornioides. Pls validate. Regards, Shrikant Ingalhalikar

On Jan 3, 11:06 pm, Satish Phadke <phadke.sat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a tiny herb.
> Must be very common. Got a chance to see its flowers. Actually the intricate

> nature of the flowers was appreciated on zooming the macro. Is it *Chamaesyce
> hypericifolia. *I could find Dinesh Valke's photo on Flickr matching this
> one.*
> *Dr Satish Phadke*
> *
>
>  DSCN4636s.jpg
> 107KViewDownload
>
>  DSCN4649s.jpg
> 102KViewDownload
>
>  DSCN4648s.jpg
> 106KViewDownload

[Dinesh Valke]

Shrikant ji, could it be Chamaesyce hypericifolia (C. glomerifera, Euphorbia glomerifera, E. hypericifolia).

But not sure of difference between C. hypericifolia and Euphorbia zornioides ...

Regards.

 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

[J.M. Garg]

Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise pl.

Earlier relevant feedback:

“This is herb with erect stem, leaves opposite and with stipules.

Involucres on axillary pedunculate cymes. I have identified this as

Euphorbia zornioides. Pls validate. Regards, Shrikant Ingalhalikar”

 

“Shrikant ji, could it be Chamaesyce hypericifolia (C. glomerifera, Euphorbia glomerifera, E. hypericifolia).
But not sure of difference between C. hypericifolia and Euphorbia zornioides ... ” from Dinesh ji.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

--
With regards,
J.M.Garg (jmg...@gmail.com)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1
'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
Image Resource of more than a thousand species of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg
For learning about Indian Flora, visit/ join Google e-group- Efloraofindia:http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix

[Vijayadas D]

Euphorbia hirta ?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.

To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

--
VijayadasD
Horticulturalist / Estates Supervisor Deputy
Electro Saudi Services Ltd
Salwa Garden Village
Riyadh-11462,PBNO-7210
KSA
vijayadas.wetpaint.com

Ferns are funniest plants..............!!!!!

[Balkar Arya]

I think Euphorbia microphylla ?

[J.M. Garg]

Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise pl.

Earlier relevant feedback:

“This is herb with erect stem, leaves opposite and with stipules.
Involucres on axillary pedunculate cymes. I have identified this as
Euphorbia zornioides. Pls validate. Regards, Shrikant Ingalhalikar”

 

“Shrikant ji, could it be Chamaesyce hypericifolia (C. glomerifera, Euphorbia glomerifera, E. hypericifolia).
But not sure of difference between C. hypericifolia and Euphorbia zornioides ... ” from Dinesh ji.

 

“Euphorbia hirta ?” from Vijayadas ji.

 

"I think Euphorbia microphylla ?" from Balkar ji.

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Satish Phadke <phadke...@gmail.com>
Date: 3 January 2010 23:36
Subject: [indiantreepix:25939] Euphorbia species for ID 3/01/2010
To: indiantreepix Indian <indian...@googlegroups.com>

This is a tiny herb.
Must be very common. Got a chance to see its flowers. Actually the intricate nature of the flowers was appreciated on zooming the macro. Is it Chamaesyce hypericifolia. I could find Dinesh Valke's photo on Flickr matching this one.
Dr Satish Phadke

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

[J.M. Garg]

Forwarding again for Id confirmation or otherwise pl.
Earlier relevant feedback:
“This is herb with erect stem, leaves opposite and with stipules.
Involucres on axillary pedunculate cymes. I have identified this as
Euphorbia zornioides. Pls validate. Regards, Shrikant Ingalhalikar”
 
“Shrikant ji, could it be Chamaesyce hypericifolia (C. glomerifera, Euphorbia glomerifera, E. hypericifolia).
But not sure of difference between C. hypericifolia and Euphorbia zornioides ... ” from Dinesh ji.
 
“Euphorbia hirta ?” from Vijayadas ji.
 
"I think Euphorbia microphylla ?" from Balkar ji.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Satish Phadke <phadke...@gmail.com>
Date: 3 January 2010 23:36
Subject: [indiantreepix:25939] Euphorbia species for ID 3/01/2010
To: indiantreepix Indian <indian...@googlegroups.com>

This is a tiny herb.
Must be very common. Got a chance to see its flowers. Actually the intricate nature of the flowers was appreciated on zooming the macro. Is it Chamaesyce hypericifolia. I could find Dinesh Valke's photo on Flickr matching this one.
Dr Satish Phadke

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

[Rohit Patel]

yes this is “Euphorbia hirta ?”

 i am with Vijayadas ji.


 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.

To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

--
ROHITKUMAR M.PATEL
Asst. Project cordinator
(Grassland development)
AHKC unit,Sahjeevan
175, Jalaram Society,
Vijay Nagar
Bhuj Kachchh-  370001
Gujarat, India
www.sahjeevan.org
E-mail (2):-rohitpa...@yahoo.com
Mo.:- 09724337687

[satish pardeshi]

hello all

check it out with Euphorbia erythroclada

http://iscmumbai.maharashtra.gov.in/Fig%20875-889.htm

Regards

Satish Pardeshi

--
Satish Pardeshi
Plant Taxonomist
Mumbai, Pune

[Vijayadas D]

 fanatastic work

--
Vijayadas D
Horticulturist EstateSupervisorDeputy
Salwa Garden Village, PB -7210
Riyadh -11462 , KSA

[Satish Phadke]

Thanks Satish Ji
It definitely closely matches with the reference page picture.
To tell the details of characters of my specimen apart from seen in the picture..........
The leaves and plant in general not hairy as in E.hirsuta.Leaves 2cm* bye 0.5 cm or so in opposite pairs, finely serrate. Capsule reddish 3 lobed. The plant was growing as a weed in garden.
The description matches fairly well with that in BSI Mah flora.
Dr Phadke

[satish pardeshi]

yes Satish Ji
the stem was not hairy at all, so was not conveinced of it being E. hirta. Euphorbia erythroclada i collected from the bank of Dahisar river.
Sorrry i dnt provide the description and information along with the link

Regards
Satish Pardeshi

[Satish Phadke]

Forwarding again for comparison to recent Madhuri ji's post

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Satish Phadke <phadke...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 11:36 PM
Subject: Euphorbia species for ID 3/01/2010
To: indiantreepix Indian <indian...@googlegroups.com>

This is a tiny herb.
Must be very common. Got a chance to see its flowers. Actually the intricate nature of the flowers was appreciated on zooming the macro. Is it Chamaesyce hypericifolia. I could find Dinesh Valke's photo on Flickr matching this one.
Dr Satish Phadke

--
Dr Satish Phadke

[Giby Kuriakose]

Yes this is Euphorbia hypericifolia  and Chamaesyce hypericifolia is a synonym now, according to the plant list. 

Regards

Giby

--
GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD
Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE),
Royal Enclave,
Jakkur Post, Srirampura
Bangalore- 560064
India
Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile)
visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby

[J.M. Garg]

A reply from another thread:

"This seems to be Euphorbia indica Lam. with cyathia clustered in axillary peduncles. In E. erythroclada, the cyathia are solitary of paired in axils, never in clusters as here. The leaves are pale greenish silvery white beneath in E. erythroclada, but the lower surface of leaves are not visible in the photo.

N. P. Balakrishnan, 11 Nov. 2013"

 

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Satish Phadke <phadke...@gmail.com>

Date: 3 January 2010 23:36

Subject: [indiantreepix:25939] Euphorbia species for ID 3/01/2010
To: indiantreepix Indian <indian...@googlegroups.com>

This is a tiny herb.
Must be very common. Got a chance to see its flowers. Actually the intricate nature of the flowers was appreciated on zooming the macro. Is it Chamaesyce hypericifolia. I could find Dinesh Valke's photo on Flickr matching this one.
Dr Satish Phadke

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "indiantreepix" group.
To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix?hl=en.

--

With regards,
J.M.Garg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1

'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'

The whole world uses my Image Resource of more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, Butterflies, Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg. You can also use them for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each image.

For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google e-group (largest in the world): http://groups.google.co.in/group/indiantreepix (more than 2190 members & 1,72,300 messages on 31/10/13) or Efloraofindia website: https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/ (with a species database of more than 9000 species & 1,80, 000 images).

Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common Birds of India'. 

[Nambiyath Balakrishnan]

After seeing the currently uploaded photos, I find that this species should be Euphorbia hypericifolia L., where the leaves are longer than in E. indica. Further the limbs of glands are pinkish white and the cyathia clusters are subtended by smaller leaves, which is not found in E. indica.

N.P.Balakrishnan, 22 Nov. 2013

[Satish Phadke]

I find that there are two IDs both given by Balakrishnan ji

Garg ji hope this is not a mix up.

Dr Satish Phadke

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to indiantreepi...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to indian...@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[Nambiyath Balakrishnan]

To remove the contradiction in the identifications, I once again reiterate that my identification that this species is Euphorbia hypericifolia (syn.: Chamaesyce hypericifolia) is the correct identification. The earlier identification that it is E. indica is not correct.

N. P. Balakrishnan, 26 Nov. 2013