Garg ji
This has been true for me also, although in a
different way. During last 30 years or so I must have visited so many hill
stations in connection with botanical trips. It was sufficient for me to
identify for students the commonly growing plants. The madness started only
after my son presented me a digital SLR camera last year (Earlier I had SLR
film camera, with which you can't be that liberal). Last year I took more
than 5000 photographs in California (they went into my International edition
book), more than 2000 this year, and more than 1000 in Manali trip. Now I
want to identify, every plant I click. We are all similar in that
sense.
And the way I identified
Cuphea hyssopifolia and had no clue about another species of same genus,
puts us all in the same bracket.
Identification is a learning
process for all of us, especially when we may be confronted with any
of more than quarter million species of flowering plants.
You can
imagine my madness when I could find only a single small plant,
which looked very interesting to me. I managed to take different
photographs of this plant and finally managed to identify it as Viola
betonicifolia.