This is where you think it might be a good idea to teach In-Portal to
auto-redirect Users (with 302 redirect) to the correct Url Endings to
make sure we don't end up with lots of Duplicate Content URLs on the
website?
However, in additional (to the same task) we have developed
functionality when you can choose the URL ending for your site with
the option to pass custom URL ending to <inp2:m_Link url_ending="/"/>
tag. This custom option gives you the ability to customize the url
ending where you want - for example list of categories can end on /
instead of selected by default .html and so on.
Here is the question:
Should we (or should not) add a new Configuration Variable (in Admin)
which will ALWAYS automatically send (by redirect with 302) user to
selected (correct) Urls Ending skipping the Custom Ending Url
described in prev. paragraph?
Note: this variable can be turned off by default.
Answer: Yes or No (comments welcome)
Everyones voice counts here!
DA.
PS. I am - Yes.
Phil -- wbtc.fr --
unread,
Apr 26, 2010, 12:17:05 PM4/26/10
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Sign in to report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to in-por...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dmitry,
I vote YES.
The reason is this is related to a question I had in mind about duplicate. Actually, if I set up a section, let's say section "test", the following links:
WILL NOT DISPLAY the section but the website home page (in my case the section is empty)
We had a talk about section vs.page before (sorry I can't find it), and my asking about having an admin list different for content and section is related to the behavior on front end: a section should display only on calling it with "/" at the end, while content pages should display only when using their name + URL ending