Issues with user registration from administrative console

已查看 4 次
跳至第一个未读帖子

Alexander Obuhovich

未读,
2010年6月8日 16:17:292010/6/8
收件人 In-Portal Bugs
There are 2 configuration options:
  1. automatically generate password for new users
  2. use email as login
First option doesn't work in administrative console at all and I still see password fields and I can use them. Of course none email is sent to user, with it's auto-generated password.

Second option will work as expected, but it will always overwrite Login field contents with Email field value. In administrative console I have both fields editable, but I think that Login field should not be available for editing or totally hidden in this case.

In conclusion I think that user registration form in administrative console should work same way as on front-end.



--
Best Regards,

http://www.in-portal.com
http://www.alex-time.com

Phil -- wbtc.fr --

未读,
2010年6月8日 20:43:372010/6/8
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
I agree, but login field should be greyed, and not hidden (could be confusing for average admin ^^)

2010/6/8 Alexander Obuhovich <aik....@gmail.com>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "In-Portal Bugs Team" group.
To post to this group, send email to in-port...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to in-portal-bug...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/in-portal-bugs?hl=en.

Alexander Obuhovich

未读,
2010年6月9日 08:54:122010/6/9
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
I'm ok with login field disabled, that's why I'm asking, since I'm not pretty sure about it too.

Alexander Obuhovich

未读,
2010年6月10日 14:58:152010/6/10
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
Dmitry, what's you thoughts on this?

Dmitry Andrejev

未读,
2010年6月10日 17:02:282010/6/10
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
Hi guys,

I think we should:

1. Still allow to enter the Password in Admin even if in Admin it's auto-generated, but I would add a JS button Generate password next to the password field (and i will auto populate in repeat password if used)

2. I would disable Login field, but would show changes in there as Admin types the email so there is NO confusion why it's this way and Admin sees that Login basically will be the same as Email, but can't change it.


DA.

Alexander Obuhovich

未读,
2010年6月11日 03:12:512010/6/11
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
What about emails, that are sent to user being created while auto-generate password option is in use?

Dmitry V. Andrejev

未读,
2010年6月11日 15:51:002010/6/11
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
What if we have a checkbox (available only when that option is selected) which is checked by default and we'll be sending passwords to the user?


DA.


-- 
With best regards,

Dmitry V. Andrejev

Alexander Obuhovich

未读,
2010年6月11日 16:05:242010/6/11
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
Why we need to complicate things in administrative console? No options, just work as simple as on front-end. I will generate password before page is displayed, since I can't place anything in password fields later.

Dmitry Andrejev

未读,
2010年6月11日 16:33:002010/6/11
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
1. I can't agree here. It's a bit confusing if I click Add User and see some password there especially if I am not a ROOT who setup the system to auto-generate the passwords.

I think we should have that "Generate" button in JS which will do both - generate the pass and put it in both Password and Repeat password. I say we show it always - see attached screen.

2. Have a check-box which would email user a password and it can be always there too, but will be pre-checked if current setting indicates that password is generated and email automatically.


The way I see it - the problem with doing in Admin exactly as we do in Front won't do any good from the Interface point - only additional complexity.


DA.
password.png

Phil -- wbtc.fr --

未读,
2010年6月11日 18:29:062010/6/11
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
I don't see the point being an administrator and having an auto-password-generation system. The custom can do it by himself following "lost password" process, and an administrator would enter directly a new password prompted by user, don't you think so?

2010/6/11 Dmitry Andrejev <dand...@gmail.com>

Dmitry Andrejev

未读,
2010年6月11日 18:44:382010/6/11
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
Point is simple:

Task: Phil, please create a new User for a new System Admin or Regular user and email him the details.

How many steps you'll need to do? At least 3 (plus all in separate places)

1. Think of the password and put it in
2. Create a User
3. Email the User his details.


If we do what I suggest we can do this in 1 simple step from the same Add User step and user will get his Username/Password sent by In-Portal.


Again, the functionality will be useful NOT only when we have auto-generate password enabled for the Front, but in all cases.

I hope it explains things a bit better.


DA.

Phil -- wbtc.fr --

未读,
2010年6月12日 03:53:002010/6/12
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
Hi Dmitry,

I clearly understand your point and I agree, if the button create a temporary password AND e-mail user the password AND confirm the sending AND close the user's file. Avoiding any supplementary clicks is a very good idea, and I agree in this way :)

Phil.

2010/6/12 Dmitry Andrejev <dand...@gmail.com>

Alexander Obuhovich

未读,
2010年6月12日 06:49:362010/6/12
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
I see your point now, and I agree too.

Dmitry Andrejev

未读,
2010年6月13日 23:45:312010/6/13
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
Great!

I guess we are ready for a task here?


DA.

Alexander Obuhovich

未读,
2010年6月14日 03:40:342010/6/14
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
Yes.

Dmitry Andrejev

未读,
2010年6月14日 15:39:362010/6/14
收件人 in-port...@googlegroups.com
New task has been filed:


778: Improvements to Create User & Admin form in Admin



I have improved specs a bit so it's more consistent with current system.


DA.
回复全部
回复作者
转发
0 个新帖子