Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Feedback about NCIP LookupUser message
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Karen  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2011, 10:46 am
From: Karen <librarywebc...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 21 2011 10:46 am
Subject: Feedback about NCIP LookupUser message
Hi all,

The group is working on the NCIP toolkit's versionf of the NCIP
LookupUser message. We're close to having things defined but we need
some feedback from the group. The NCIP LookupUser message can contain
information about a users financial transactions with the library.
There are two sections where this appear. One is Amount subelement of
the LoanedItem element. This is where the fines a given loaned item
would appear. The other place where financial information appears is
in the UserFiscalAccount element which contains subelements for each
financial transaction.

The question which the group has is how much access to libraries have
to get this information out of their current integrated library
systems? Would your library be able to access this information in a
programmatic way to build a connector? We'd appreciate libraries
replying and commenting on whether or not they have programmatic
access to this information and via what ILS. We'll use this to help us
define whether or not these should be a required element and what
libraries without access to this information should do when
implementing LookupUser.

Thanks,

Karen


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ross Singer  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2011, 2:25 pm
From: Ross Singer <rossfsin...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:25:35 -0400
Local: Mon, Mar 21 2011 2:25 pm
Subject: Re: [ils-di] Feedback about NCIP LookupUser message
Alto (formerly Talis, now Capita) customers have access to this.  It's
simple if they have Capita (formerly Talis) Keystone, since it appears
in the borrower response and, I think, the item response.

It's also possible to do directly from Sybase, since this is how the
Jangle connector does it.  There is a stored procedure,
CL_CALC_FINE_SP:

exec CL_CALC_FINE_SP {LOAN.LOAN_TYPE}, '{Date stamp of return}',
'{LOAN.CREATE_LOCATION}', {BORROWER.TYPE_ID}, {ITEM.TYPE_ID}

I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader how they run a Sybase
stored proc in the language of their choice.

What this returns is an estimate of what the fines would be for a
given item for a particular user type.

-Ross.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »