Exact Installation IE9.js?

[Conrad Taylor]

Hi, I was wondering, what's the exact installation of the IE9.js
script? For example, should it go before or after a page's css link
declarations or it really doesn't matter?

Thanks in advance,

-Conrad

[Dean Edwards]

On 28/02/2010 20:20, Conrad Taylor wrote:
> Hi, I was wondering, what's the exact installation of the IE9.js
> script? For example, should it go before or after a page's css link
> declarations or it really doesn't matter?
>

It doesn't matter.

-dean

[ddoesburg]

I think it matters because at least the font-family will be
overwritten if IE9.js goes after the stylesheet(s).

Greetz,

Daniel

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ie7-js" group.
To post to this group, send email to ie7...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ie7-js+un...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ie7-js?hl=en.

[evo]

This is happening to me, regardless of where I place the script in the
markup.
I submitted an issue last night describing this but it's been deleted,
along with another bug I submitted describing :last-child simply not
working.

This is all in IE7.

[Liam Potter]

It seems those issues haven't been deleted, I just couldn't find them
again...

[Dean Edwards]

On 03/05/2010 18:23, evo wrote:
> This is happening to me, regardless of where I place the script in
> the markup. I submitted an issue last night describing this but it's
> been deleted, along with another bug I submitted describing
> :last-child simply not working.
>

You submitted two bug reports.

You did not provide a test page for the first one so I marked it
invalid. You have since provided a test page:

http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/issues/detail?id=244

The second one I could not recreate:

http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/issues/detail?id=245

You didn't say at all in your bug reports that this was related to where
you put the script. Why are you now associating your bug reports with
this problem?

I will look into the issues you've raised but can you please respect
that I support this script in my spare time? There is no need to act
like you are getting a raw deal.

[Liam Potter]

I didn't mean to come off as an ass with that sorry. Once I realised
they had not been removed I posted a retraction of that.
I didn't mention it being about where I placed the script because it
didn't matter where I put the script, my fonts where still stripped and
this was the only other post I found mentioning this problem.

Again, I apologise for sounding like a dick.

- Liam

[Dean Edwards]

On 03/05/2010 19:41, Liam Potter wrote:
> I didn't mean to come off as an ass with that sorry. Once I realised
> they had not been removed I posted a retraction of that.
> I didn't mention it being about where I placed the script because it
> didn't matter where I put the script, my fonts where still stripped and
> this was the only other post I found mentioning this problem.
>
> Again, I apologise for sounding like a dick.
>

No worries. You helped find a bug in IE7.js (which is now fixed). Thanks
for persisting with my bug reporting system. ;)