Dear all - I'd like to share with you a study of relevance to this list.
In 2010, the Population Council partnered with the Population and Reproductive Health Initiative (PRHI), a collaborative group between Ahmadu Bello University and the University of California, Berkeley, and eHealth Nigeria to conduct the mobile Community Based Surveillance (mCBS) study. The purpose of the study was to assess maternal and newborn health in Tsibiri, a rural community near the city of Zaria, Nigeria. The information gathered was intended to assist communities in developing interventions that will improve maternal and newborn health in a participatory way.
The project commenced in June 2010, with community-based
group ANC called Healthy Mothers Clubs (HMCs) and RapidSMS
mobile phone surveillance of maternal and newborn health events by
Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs). The
participation of TBAs in surveillance is particularly relevant since we've come upon no
evidence to support the role of TBAs in health referral using mobile
phones.
The objectives of the RapidSMS evaluation were to:
1. To determine if automated data collection via SMS cellphone technology can improve vital event reporting quality as compared to hand-based tabulations
2. To determine if semi-literate
traditional birth attendants (TBAs) and community health extension workers
(CHEWs) can effectively use SMS cellphone technology to conduct systematic
surveillance of household vital events in their communities
Here’s a Youtube video of the RapidSMS activity.
The HMC activity was conducted fortnightly and facilitated by a 2-person team of researchers/ PRHI Fellows. eHealth Nigeria deployed OpenMRS to facilitate the HMC activity, including the digitization of all local surveillance forms, capture of the data gathered over a period of 1 year, and training of key personnel in the use of EMRS for case management. For the RapidSMS, 7 TBAs from Tsibiri were trained how to recognize and respond to vital maternal and child health events. On-call health personnel were alerted via SMS to respond in the event of a MNCH emergency.
The project developed training guides for TBAs and Community Health Extension Workers (CHEWs), and conducted trainings in the field for the TBAs which can be seen on eHealth Nigeria’s Youtube channel.
The project contributed to an essential toolkit necessary to stimulate both supply and demand for maternal and child health services in communities where public health resources are extremely scarce. The OMRS succeeded in registering over 87 women and infants while the vital event reporting system successfully engaged TBAs in the monitoring of mothers and babies at the household level. However, vital events were relatively rare over the reporting period with only 9 vital events occurring, 75% of which were reported but 25% of which were done so with a reporting error. As a result, 50% of events were reported correctly.
Although both activities proved to be a qualified success, particularly in a context where health outcomes are dire, a number of challenges hindered the project’s ability to accurately record the impact the interventions on maternal and newborn health. Two major challenges were 1) difficulties in ensuring complete and adequate records keeping, and 2) tracking and follow-up of patients and newborns into the community. Through the linking of the OMRS and RapidSMS household registration and reporting of expectant mothers and mother-baby pairs, it is hoped the system will improve loss to follow and continuum of care for mothers and infants at the community level as well as provide adequate linkages to facilities where primary and secondary care is administered.
I and the study team would be glad to respond to any questions or comments.
Many thanks.
Andrew.
Dear Andrew and the rest of the mCBS team,
Thanks for this great post and videos for an important and thoughtful project. I also don’t think we’ve seen many projects that directly serve TBAs, despite their obvious importance. I have a few questions, but as always no need to reply to them all.
Can you elaborate a little on the role of OpenMRS? Did inputs from RapidSMS create or extend electronic patient records? Was OpenMRS used in clinical workflows or was it used as a backend system to track the project?
Am I right that you taught the TBAs numeric codes to use to report events, such as to send in a 9 for post-partum hemorrhage? Had you also considered using codes such as “PPH”? Do you know if remembering the numeric codes (or even remembering to take the booklet or such that described) them was a challenge?
And I wonder if you could share any thoughts on what the incentives (in the broadest sense) were for the TBAs or CHEWs to do the reporting? Given that that there hasn’t been very much mHealth work with TBAs (though others on the list feel free to point us to examples), do you all have any further thoughts on the best way to support them with mHealth tools?
You mentioned that there were 9 vital events during the period. How did you know that outside of the electronic reporting system? This is just a question of how you did the research.
And finally, are there alerts or reminders in the system (or perhaps planned) that will help reduce loss to follow up?
Thanks again!
take care,
neal
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ict4chw" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ict4chw/-/i09yvMg737IJ.
To post to this group, send email to ict...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ict4chw+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ict4chw?hl=en.