Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Wireless shot across the parking lot.

Received: by 10.14.204.3 with SMTP id g3mr14884686eeo.7.1351018083011;
        Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: i3detroit-public@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.14.176.133 with SMTP id b5ls518773eem.1.gmail; Tue, 23 Oct
 2012 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.209.66 with SMTP id r42mr15504159eeo.1.1351018077446;
        Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.209.66 with SMTP id r42mr15504158eeo.1.1351018077434;
        Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <drew4...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ee0-f42.google.com (mail-ee0-f42.google.com [74.125.83.42])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z47si648838eel.0.2012.10.23.11.47.57
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of drew4...@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.125.83.42;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of drew4...@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=drew4...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-ee0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l10so1550447eei.15
        for <i3detroit-public@googlegroups.com>; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=aaCRcE5zcTr9LLXct3Nh1DxQiRTtBXg1mjkPheJMsUs=;
        b=VyG3fyOzbc4xoF0eVNP0x8mSh6JGLIpP9VYixC3AD7C/hwLa9cxLU0E1+O2skPegqA
         Y7jNKy8w9409+0dqB0gjoBCT0L87qGxoSw9d3EkuYe6hz8+EzsjOq5ypuoab/8weW1LF
         uuqbjQgb/0heQA2+CKtSt8cRF+6GkHtOdW5m0LOFKW4sdlaW3tu1c0IuspY2TZ1Funks
         urpTTOMXa2zPgMaJCnUeCYWPnpTachP5Jla+xp9W+WINCT3YxhO/araYt8/IsfckyBwx
         deN9HbTIQ2VHCD8yF2P1jDo8OpGcU+PFRJUPtUr0Nopm/ATkzpkQ4UaLfZMUcZsznuR9
         Ipnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.203.132 with SMTP id f4mr18312101eeo.11.1351018077334; Tue,
 23 Oct 2012 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.0.193 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Oct 2012 11:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5086BC6B.3000...@bendorius.com>
References: <caa67b8d-0984-4d87-9018-938759b99...@b15g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
	<5086BC6B.3000...@bendorius.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:47:57 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA37vow6dOqCY8-qCxaPKJDJFo05RS=F8UJ=fo64dHA-T4X...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [i3detroit-public] Wireless shot across the parking lot.
From: Drew <drew4...@gmail.com>
To: i3detroit-public@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

If you use two Cantennae, one on each end and pointed at each other,
it should not matter if you're using a frequency (2.4 GHz) that is
heavilly stepped on.

(Btw, I thought the space to be acquired was adjacent?)