On Friday, July 5, 2013 11:01:48 PM UTC+1,
jobr...@kc.rr.com wrote:
> The recordings are remastered and the results are some what between the way Marston does things and the way Nimbus did things. Most transfers are very clean (so I can't say what might be missing, if anything)and the echo chamber effect is not distracting. Christian Zwarg of True Sound Transfers did the remastering and if you like his work, well, there is your answer.
>
> As to the "bark", I can fully understand what Mr. Moore was saying. However, the singers Cosima like, do sound different than some of, even their contemporaries
>
> I hope this helps in your decision.
Thanks, I'll be considering it. At this level the remastering is often fairly moot, anyhow, given basic competence; it's in later stuff -- Christoff's early recordings, for example -- that I find real differences, and Nimbus in particular a bit lean-sounding. Against that, Nimbus often sourced their 78s from an excellent singer-collector, Norman White (if I remember correctly, the first Donner I ever saw), whose copies tended to be excellent, so that gave them some advantage in non-master recordings.
But what really concerns me is the artificiality of the original early acoustic recording conditions, which is seldom allowed for in judging an artist. I think it may have intensified the Bark, and perhaps other mannerisms also. When a whole new design of horn-amplified violin had to be made to register, what hope for poor singers?
Cheers,
Mike