While our news media that is now owned almost entirely by pro-Zionist Republicans is harping on what Senator Obama's former pastor said 20 years ago and other non-news, they have almost completely ignored telling us the simple truth of Senator John McCrook's biography, including his involvement in the 1980s in the Keating 5 lobbyist scandal and his more recent involvement in the Vickie Eiseman lobbyist scandal. That sounds like the real news to me, and this shows that, much like George W. Bush, Senator McCrook has sold out to the highest bidders and doesn't represent the majority of the American people. If president, McCrook's going to be looking out for the Zionist lobby, the big oil companies, the drug companies, outsourcing millions of American jobs overseas, slashing our Social Security, etc., much as the Bush administration has been doing for the past 7 1/3 years. See http://www.squidoo.com/the-democratic-party
RW <rogerwbo...@yahoo.com> writes: >While our news media that is now owned almost entirely by pro-Zionist >Republicans is harping on what Senator Obama's former pastor said 20 >years ago and other non-news, they have almost completely ignored >telling us the simple truth of Senator John McCrook's biography, >including his involvement in the 1980s in the Keating 5 lobbyist >scandal and his more recent involvement in the Vickie Eiseman lobbyist >scandal. That sounds like the real news to me,
Not by your own standards, hypocrite. You say that what was said in the past by Obama's pastor isn't news, and then raise an issue that is nearly as old.
Typical Republicrat hypocracy. Democrats and Republicans are simply opposite sides of the same phoney coin.
-Stephen -- "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" Stephen Adams malchus84...@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)
> RW <rogerwbo...@yahoo.com> writes: > >While our news media that is now owned almost entirely by pro-Zionist > >Republicans is harping on what Senator Obama's former pastor said 20 > >years ago and other non-news, they have almost completely ignored > >telling us the simple truth of Senator John McCrook's biography, > >including his involvement in the 1980s in the Keating 5 lobbyist > >scandal and his more recent involvement in the Vickie Eiseman lobbyist > >scandal. That sounds like the real news to me,
> Not by your own standards, hypocrite. You say that what was said in > the past by Obama's pastor isn't news, and then raise an issue that is > nearly as old.
> Typical Republicrat hypocracy. Democrats and Republicans are simply > opposite sides of the same phoney coin.
> -Stephen > -- > "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" Stephen Adams > malchus84...@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)
The Keating 5 story goes back to the 1980s, but is relevant news as to something HE did, not someone he knew did, related to his character and qualifications to be president of the US, especially when Mr. McCain was in a similar more recent lobbyist scandal, the Vickie Eisman scandal, which was very well documented by America's largest newspaper, the New York Times.
RW <rogerwbo...@yahoo.com> writes: >On May 4, 6:06=A0pm, Stephen Adams <ada...@no.spam> wrote: >> RW <rogerwbo...@yahoo.com> writes: >> >While our news media that is now owned almost entirely by pro-Zionist >> >Republicans is harping on what Senator Obama's former pastor said 20 >> >years ago and other non-news, they have almost completely ignored >> >telling us the simple truth of Senator John McCrook's biography, >> >including his involvement in the 1980s in the Keating 5 lobbyist >> >scandal and his more recent involvement in the Vickie Eiseman lobbyist >> >scandal. That sounds like the real news to me,
>> Not by your own standards, hypocrite. =A0You say that what was said in >> the past by Obama's pastor isn't news, and then raise an issue that is >> nearly as old.
>> Typical Republicrat hypocracy. Democrats and Republicans are simply >> opposite sides of the same phoney coin.
>The Keating 5 story goes back to the 1980s, but is relevant news as to >something HE did, not someone he knew did, related to his character >and qualifications to be president of the US,
But that's not the standard you proposed. And even so, I'd be far more concerned about someone who was member of an organization for 20 years when that organization teaches that the US Governemnt is behind the KKK and created AIDS to eliminate minorities.
>especially when Mr. >McCain was in a similar more recent lobbyist scandal, the Vickie >Eisman scandal, which was very well documented by America's largest >newspaper, the New York Times.
And the Times admitted that it was careless and improper in its reporting. The Times is hardly sympathetic to the Republicans, so I am surprised you would try to raise this.
If you want REAL change, forget the Republicrats and vote for a third party. Clinton, Obama and McCain are all cut from the same cloth. It'll just be more of the same.
-Stephen -- "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" Stephen Adams malchus84...@AMgmail.com (remove SPAM to reply)
