<<A number of writers, some of whom were connected with Theosophy,
have claimed that Francis Bacon (22 January 1561 – 9 April 1626), the
English philosopher, statesman, scientist, and author, was a member of
secret societies; a smaller number claim that he was an Ascended
Master and was reincarnated.
Francis Bacon often gathered with the men at Gray's Inn to discuss
politics and philosophy, and to try out various theatrical scenes that
he admitted writing. Bacon's alleged connection to the Rosicrucians
and the Freemasons has been widely discussed by authors and scholars
in many books. However others, including Daphne du Maurier (in her
biography of Bacon), have argued there is no substantive evidence to
support claims of involvement with the Rosicrucians. Historian Dame
Frances Yates does not make the claim that Bacon was a Rosicrucian,
but presents evidence that he was nevertheless involved in some of the
more closed intellectual movements of his day. She argues that Bacon's
movement for the advancement of learning was closely connected with
the German Rosicrucian movement, while Bacon's The New Atlantis
portrays a land ruled by Rosicrucians. He apparently saw his own
movement for the advancement of learning to be in conformity with
Rosicrucian ideals.
In 1618 Francis Bacon decided to secure a lease for York House. This
had been his boyhood home in London next to the Queen's York Place
before the Bacon family had moved to Gorhambury in the countryside.
After Lord Egerton (Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England) died, it
became available for Bacon to lease. During the next four years this
mansion on the Strand (so large that it had 40 fireplaces) served as
the home for Francis and Alice Bacon. Over the next four years Bacon
would host banquets at York House that were attended by the leading
men of the time, including poets, scholars, authors, scientists,
lawyers, diplomats, and foreign dignitaries. Within the banquet hall,
Francis gathered the greatest leaders in literature, art, law,
education, and social reform. On 22 January 1621 in honour of Sir
Francis Bacon's sixtieth birthday, a select group of men assembled in
the large banquet hall in York House without fanfare for what has been
described as a Masonic banquet. This banquet was to pay tribute to Sir
Francis Bacon. Only those of the Rosicrosse (Rosicrucians) and the
Masons who were already aware of Bacon's leadership role were invited.
The tables were T-tables with gleaming white drapery, silver, and
decorations of flowers. The poet Ben Jonson, a long-time friend of
Bacon, gave a Masonic ode to Bacon that day.
There was a depth of love by a large body of men toward Bacon, similar
to some degree in the manner that disciples love a Master. This is
especially true when taking into account his membership (and some say
leadership) of secret societies such as the Rosicrucians and
Freemasons. In the inner esoteric membership, which included Francis
Bacon, vows of celibacy for spiritual reasons were encouraged.
Faked death theory
Various authors have written that there were indications that Francis
Bacon had gone into debt while secretly funding the publishing of
materials for the Freemasons, Rosicrucians, "Spear-Shakers", "Knights
of the Helmet", as well as publishing, with the assistance of Ben
Jonson, a selection of the plays that they believe he had written
under the pen name of "Shake-Speare" in a "First Folio" in 1623.
Furthermore, they allege that Bacon faked his own death, crossed the
English Channel, and secretly traveled in disguise after 1626 through
France, Germany, Poland, Hungary, and other areas utilizing the secret
network of Freemasons and Rosicrucians that he was associated with. It
is alleged that he continued to write under pseudonyms, as he had done
before 1626, continuing to write as late as 1670 (using the pseudonym
"Comte De Gabalis"). Elinor Von Le Coq, wife of Professor Von Le Coq
in Berlin, stated that she had found evidence in the German Archives
that Francis Bacon stayed after 1626 with the family of Johannes
Valentinus Andreae in Germany.
Beginning early in the 20th century in the United States, a number of
Ascended Master Teachings organizations began making the claim that
Francis Bacon had never died. They believed that soon after completing
the "Shake-Speare" plays, he had feigned his own death on Easter
Sunday 1626 and then travelled extensively outside of England,
eventually attaining his physical Ascension to another plane on May 1,
1684 in the region of the Carpathian Mountains. Their belief is that
Bacon took on the name "Saint Germain" as an Ascended Master.>>
> Occult theories about Francis Bacon
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occult_theories_about_Francis_Bacon
"This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to
it."
No surprise there!
> <<A number of writers, some of whom were connected with Theosophy,
Following the link to Theosophy:
"Blavatsky [one of the founders of Theosophy] suggested that most
of present day humanity belongs to the fifth rootrace, the
Aryans[8], which originally developed on Atlantis,.[9] It was
her belief that the older races will eventually die out, as the
fifth rootrace in time will be replaced by the more advanced
peoples of the sixth root race which is set to develop on the
reemerging Lemurian continent.[10]"
Evidently geology was not among Mme. Blavatsky's areas of expertise.
But if you believe this, Art, then there's a book that I think that
you would find extremely congenial -- it's by a guy named Velikovsky.
> have claimed that Francis Bacon (22 January 1561 – 9 April 1626), the
> English philosopher, statesman, scientist, and author, was a member of
> secret societies; a smaller number claim that he was an Ascended
> Master and was reincarnated.
Really?! Are you among those who believe that he was reincarnated,
Art? If so, there's a guy named Michael Martin (the surname is an
anagram of "I'm Art N."!) whom you should meet -- you would be well
suited to be one of his disciples, Art.
> Francis Bacon often gathered with the men at Gray's Inn to discuss
> politics and philosophy, and to try out various theatrical scenes that
> he admitted writing.
Huh?
> Bacon's alleged connection to the Rosicrucians
> and the Freemasons has been widely discussed by authors and scholars
> in many books.
"...has been widely discussed by authors and scholars..."? *Which"
"authors and scholars"? Are you trying to emulate Elizabeth's style,
Art?
> However others, including Daphne du Maurier (in her
> biography of Bacon), have argued there is no substantive evidence to
> support claims of involvement with the Rosicrucians.
"No substantive evidence" is, if anything, an understatement.
> Historian Dame
> Frances Yates does not make the claim that Bacon was a Rosicrucian,
> but presents evidence that he was nevertheless involved in some of the
> more closed intellectual movements of his day. She argues that Bacon's
> movement for the advancement of learning was closely connected with
> the German Rosicrucian movement, while Bacon's The New Atlantis
> portrays a land ruled by Rosicrucians. He apparently saw his own
> movement for the advancement of learning to be in conformity with
> Rosicrucian ideals.
>
> In 1618 Francis Bacon decided to secure a lease for York House. This
> had been his boyhood home in London next to the Queen's York Place
> before the Bacon family had moved to Gorhambury in the countryside.
> After Lord Egerton (Lord Keeper of the Great Seal of England) died, it
> became available for Bacon to lease. During the next four years this
> mansion on the Strand (so large that it had 40 fireplaces) served as
> the home for Francis and Alice Bacon. Over the next four years Bacon
> would host banquets at York House that were attended by the leading
> men of the time, including poets, scholars, authors, scientists,
> lawyers, diplomats, and foreign dignitaries. Within the banquet hall,
> Francis gathered the greatest leaders in literature, art, law,
> education, and social reform. On 22 January 1621 in honour of Sir
> Francis Bacon's sixtieth birthday, a select group of men assembled in
> the large banquet hall in York House without fanfare for what has been
> described
"...has been described..."? By *whom*? Source? Are you trying to
emulate Elizabeth's style, Art?
> as a Masonic banquet. This banquet was to pay tribute to Sir
> Francis Bacon. Only those of the Rosicrosse (Rosicrucians) and the
> Masons who were already aware of Bacon's leadership role were invited.
> The tables were T-tables with gleaming white drapery, silver, and
> decorations of flowers. The poet Ben Jonson, a long-time friend of
> Bacon, gave a Masonic ode to Bacon that day.
>
> There was a depth of love by a large body of men toward Bacon,
Bacon must have enjoyed that!
> similar
> to some degree in the manner that disciples love a Master. This is
> especially true when taking into account his membership (and some say
> leadership)
"...some say..."? *Who* says? Source? Are you trying to emulate
Elizabeth's style, Art?
> of secret societies such as the Rosicrucians and
> Freemasons. In the inner esoteric membership, which included Francis
> Bacon, vows of celibacy for spiritual reasons were encouraged.
>
> Faked death theory
>
> Various authors
"Various authors"? *Which* authors? Source? Are you trying to
emulate Elizabeth's style, Art?
> have written that there were indications that Francis
> Bacon had gone into debt while secretly funding the publishing of
> materials for the Freemasons, Rosicrucians, "Spear-Shakers",
Francis Bacon secretly funded Stephanie Caruana's publication?!
> "Knights
> of the Helmet", as well as publishing, with the assistance of Ben
> Jonson, a selection of the plays that they believe he had written
> under the pen name of "Shake-Speare" in a "First Folio" in 1623.
> Furthermore, they allege
"They allege"? *Who* alleges? Are you trying to emulate
Elizabeth's style, Art?
> that Bacon faked his own death, crossed the
> English Channel, and secretly traveled in disguise after 1626 through
> France, Germany, Poland, Hungary, and other areas utilizing the secret
> network of Freemasons and Rosicrucians that he was associated with. It
> is alleged
"It is alleged"? By *whom*? Source? Are you trying to emulate
Elizabeth's style, Art?
> that he continued to write under pseudonyms, as he had done
> before 1626, continuing to write as late as 1670
Really?! In 1670, Bacon would have been 109 years old!
> (using the pseudonym
> "Comte De Gabalis"). Elinor Von Le Coq, wife of Professor Von Le Coq
> in Berlin, stated that she had found evidence in the German Archives
> that Francis Bacon stayed after 1626 with the family of Johannes
> Valentinus Andreae in Germany.
>
> Beginning early in the 20th century in the United States, a number of
> Ascended Master Teachings organizations began making the claim that
> Francis Bacon had never died.
Are you among those who believe that Bacon neVER died, Art?
> They believed that soon after completing
> the "Shake-Speare" plays, he had feigned his own death on Easter
> Sunday 1626 and then travelled extensively outside of England,
> eventually attaining his physical Ascension to another plane on May 1,
> 1684 in the region of the Carpathian Mountains.
But Art -- "Carpathian Mountains" is an anagram of
"Shit upon Art N., maniac."
> Their belief is that
> Bacon took on the name "Saint Germain"
But Art -- "Saint Germain" is an anagram of
"G: I'm insane. -- Art"
> as an Ascended Master.>>
That sounds more like Oxford, Art. Indeed, Arundel's accusations
about Oxford's unsavory activities with Orazio Cogno make it seem
quite plausible that Oxford was widely viewed as an ass-ended master.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> "This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it."
>
> No surprise there!
Orphan, n. [L. orphanus, Gr. , akin to L. orbus. Cf. Orb a blank
window.]
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> <<A number of writers, some of whom were connected with Theosophy,
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Following the link to Theosophy:
>
> "Blavatsky [one of the founders of Theosophy] suggested that most
> of present day humanity belongs to the fifth rootrace, the
> Aryans[8], which originally developed on Atlantis,.[9] It was
> her belief that the older races will eventually die out, as the
> fifth rootrace in time will be replaced by the more advanced
> peoples of the sixth root race which is set to develop on the
> reemerging Lemurian continent.[10]"
>
> Evidently geology was not among Mme. Blavatsky's areas of expertise.
Evidently Mme. Blavatsky dismissed Wegener's
continental drift ideas along with all the experts.
-------------------------------
<<Lemuria is the name of a hypothetical "lost land" variously located
in the Indian and Pacific Oceans. The concept's 19th century origins
lie in attempts to account for discontinuities in biogeography,
however, the concept of Lemuria has been rendered obsolete by modern
understanding of plate tectonics.>>
-------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Wegener
<<Alfred Lothar Wegener (1 November 1880 – November 1930) was a German
scientist, geophysicist, and meteorologist most notable for his theory
of continental drift (Kontinentalverschiebung), proposed in 1912,
which hypothesized that the continents were slowly drifting around the
Earth. In his work, Wegener *presented a large amount of
circumstantial evidence* in support of continental drift. The
hypothesis was generally met with skepticism. The one American edition
of Wegener's work, published in 1925, was received so poorly that the
American Association of Petroleum Geologists organized a symposium
specifically in opposition to the continental drift hypothesis. Also
its opponents could, as did the Leipziger geologist Franz Kossmat,
argue that the oceanic crust was too firm for the continents to
"simply plow through". In 1943 George Gaylord Simpson wrote a vehement
attack on the theory (as well as the rival theory of sunken land
bridges) and put forward his own permanentist views. Simpson's
influence was so powerful that even in countries previously
sympathetic towards continental drift, like Australia, Wegener's
hypothesis fell out of favour.>>
-----------------------------------------
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> have claimed that Francis Bacon (22 January 1561 – 9 April 1626), the
>> English philosopher, statesman, scientist, and author, was a member of
>> secret societies; a smaller number claim that he was an Ascended
>> Master and was reincarnated.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Really?!
> Are you among those who believe that he was reincarnated, Art?
No.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> Francis Bacon often gathered with the men at Gray's Inn to discuss
>> politics and philosophy, and to try out various theatrical scenes
>> that he admitted writing.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Huh?
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> Bacon's alleged connection to the Rosicrucians and the Freemasons
>> has been widely discussed by authors and scholars in many books.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> "...has been widely discussed by authors and scholars..."?
> *Which" "authors and scholars"?
They are too numerous to mention.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> However others, including Daphne du Maurier (in her biography
>> of Bacon), have argued there is no substantive evidence to
>> support claims of involvement with the Rosicrucians.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> "No substantive evidence" is, if anything, an understatement.
---------------------------------------------
http://www.sirbacon.org/windingstair.htm
<<The suggestion that the description of the voyage in New Atlantis
may have been based on The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffics
and Discoveries of the English Nation by Rev. Richard Hakluyt first
published in 1589 is new (and credible), since both men had shares in
the Virginia Company; and we were pleased to see the reminder that Dr.
Frances Yates in the Rosicrucian Enlightenment believed that Bacon
based his Utopian fable on the famous Manifestos. The comment that
there is no proof that Francis belonged to "any mystical or other
secret society" is less convincing, however, since "proof" was the
last thing he would have wanted. The raison d'etre of any secret
society particularly one devoted to the advancement of the human race
sub rosa would have been lost.>>
---------------------------------------------
Sink.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> as a Masonic banquet. This banquet was to pay tribute to Sir
>> Francis Bacon. Only those of the Rosicrosse (Rosicrucians) and the
>> Masons who were already aware of Bacon's leadership role were invited.
>> The tables were T-tables with gleaming white drapery, silver, and
>> decorations of flowers. The poet Ben Jonson, a long-time friend of
>> Bacon, gave a Masonic ode to Bacon that day.
>
>> There was a depth of love by a large body of men toward Bacon,
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Bacon must have enjoyed that!
You know that from personal experience, Dave?
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> similar to some degree
>>in the manner that disciples love a Master. This is
>> especially true when taking into account his membership
>> (and some say leadership)
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> "...some say..."? *Who* says? Source?
Sink.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> of secret societies such as the Rosicrucians and
>> Freemasons. In the inner esoteric membership, which included Francis
>> Bacon, vows of celibacy for spiritual reasons were encouraged.
>
>> Faked death theory
>
>> Various authors
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> "Various authors"? *Which* authors? Source?
"A man so various, that he seemed to be Not one, but all mankind's
epitome."
- Dryden.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> have written that there were indications that Francis
>> Bacon had gone into debt while secretly funding the publishing of
>> materials for the Freemasons, Rosicrucians, "Spear-Shakers",
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Francis Bacon secretly funded Stephanie Caruana's publication?!
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> "Knights of the Helmet",
>> as well as publishing, with the assistance of Ben Jonson,
>> a selection of the plays that they believe he had written
>> under the pen name of "Shake-Speare" in a "First Folio" in 1623.
>> Furthermore, they allege
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> "They allege"? *Who* alleges?
Various authors.
Allege, v. t. [OE. aleggen to bring forward as evidence, fr.
an assumed LL. exlitigare; L. ex + litigare to quarrel, sue.]
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> that Bacon faked his own death, crossed the
>> English Channel, and secretly traveled in disguise after 1626 through
>> France, Germany, Poland, Hungary, and other areas utilizing the secret
>> network of Freemasons and Rosicrucians that he was associated with. It
>> is alleged
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> "It is alleged"? By *whom*? Source?
Sink?
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> that he continued to write under pseudonyms, as he had done
>> before 1626, continuing to write as late as 1670
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Really?! In 1670, Bacon would have been 109 years old!
He was packed in snow most of that time.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> (using the pseudonym
>> "Comte De Gabalis"). Elinor Von Le Coq, wife of Professor Von Le Coq
>> in Berlin, stated that she had found evidence in the German Archives
>> that Francis Bacon stayed after 1626 with the family of Johannes
>> Valentinus Andreae in Germany.
>
>> Beginning early in the 20th century in the United States,
>> a number of Ascended Master Teachings organizations
>> began making the claim that Francis Bacon had never died.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Are you among those who believe that Bacon neVER died, Art?
No. (That tomato Lettice Knollys neVER died though.)
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> They believed that soon after completing
>> the "Shake-Speare" plays, he had feigned his own death on Easter
>> Sunday 1626 and then travelled extensively outside of England,
>> eventually attaining his physical Ascension to another plane
>> on May 1, 1684 in the region of the Carpathian Mountains.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> But Art -- "Carpathian Mountains" is an anagram of
>
> "Shit upon Art N., maniac."
INIPNC= (-1/19)
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
>>
>> Their belief is that
>> Bacon took on the name "Saint Germain"
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> But Art -- "Saint Germain" is an anagram of
> "G: I'm insane. -- Art"
INIPNC= (-1/12)
Art Neuendorffer
The longest word constructed: CONFABULATIONS
To me, it indicates that he was a teacher of the occult, and gave
satsangs (talks) on it quite frequently. He was one of Shakespeare's
successors.
For Shakespeare Occult
We have SPECTACULARS.
He was, indeed, a spectacular Master of the occult.
For Marlowe Occult
We have COLLECTOR.
Marlowe, like Christ, was collecting his sheep, as the Good Shepherd.
He collected them and took them to occult stages of consciousness.
Michael Martin
> -------------------------------http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Wegener
> ---------------------------------------------http://www.sirbacon.org/windingstair.htm
Art. The Theosophists were MODERNS. Like Looney,
they had no direct knowledge of any 16th century figures.
> Francis Bacon often gathered with the men at Gray's Inn to discuss
> politics and philosophy, and to try out various theatrical scenes that
> he admitted writing. Bacon's alleged connection to the Rosicrucians
> and the Freemasons has been widely discussed by authors and scholars
> in many books. However others, including Daphne du Maurier (in her
> biography of Bacon), have argued there is no substantive evidence to
> support claims of involvement with the Rosicrucians. Historian Dame
> Frances Yates does not make the claim that Bacon was a Rosicrucian,
> but presents evidence that he was nevertheless involved in some of the
> more closed intellectual movements of his day. She argues that Bacon's
> movement for the advancement of learning was closely connected with
> the German Rosicrucian movement, while Bacon's
WHAT?
Bacon's assignment, which he commenced at a
very young age, was to MAKE the English literary
movement which the Privy Council, at the behest of
Sir Nicholas Bacon (a member) adopted in 1558.
The resolution was sent to the Queen who ignored
it. Bacon writes two letters to Burghley attempting
to get Burghley to lobby the Queen (as Burghley had
promised years earlier) but noting comes of it except
for Bacon's threat to become "a mere seller of books,"
when threat Bacon in fact carries out.
As the Queen refused to patronize poets (including
her son Oxford), the Protestant coterie relocated
to Wilton where they were patronized by the Countess
of Pembroke.
In Pseudonymous Shakespeare, Penny McCarthy
situates a 15-year old Stratford butcher lad at Wilton
Upon Avon and makes him Mary's lover.
McCarthy is the best close reader of the text I've ever encountered
but she has one debilitating characteristic, SHE'S A STRAT.
Everything must be bent to the Strats.
[. . .]
Bacon's mind turned toward science after he
was told to read Aristotle. Bacon was then only
14 years old and a student at Cambridge.
I was shocked to find how vehement Bacon was
on the subject of Aristotle (who promoted the
a priori over direct observation and experience)
I mean Bacon actually CURSED Aristotle. i was
shocked.
Bacon never turned back, all the destruction of the
Baconian claim to the Shakespeare works has been
done in the modern era by well, devotees, you might
say, to the Aristotelian view that your fantasies are
superior to direct knowledge.
Terrible irony.
Bacon's mind turned toward science after he
was told to read Aristotle. Bacon was then only
14 years old and a student at Cambridge.
MM:
It's not surprising to me. Bacon was probably the reincarnation of
Aristotle.
Elizabeth:
I was shocked to find how vehement Bacon was
on the subject of Aristotle (who promoted the
a priori over direct observation and experience)
I mean Bacon actually CURSED Aristotle. i was
shocked.
MM:
He must have been young and inexperienced at the time. Aristotle was
really great. He was a foremost student of Plato, and was the Guru of
Alexander the Great. Alexander later reincarnated as Julius Caesar
and Shakespeare. Aristotle didn't make enough research by meditation
on the center of the solar system. Even on that, he was not totally
wrong, The center of the universe is everywhere, as the Creator is
omnipresent.
Elizabeth:
Bacon never turned back, all the destruction of the
Baconian claim to the Shakespeare works has been
done in the modern era by well, devotees, you might
say, to the Aristotelian view that your fantasies are
superior to direct knowledge.
MM:
Well, Aristotle was a spiritual Master. He was more that, than he was
a scientist, otherwise, perhaps he would have spent more time on it.
Terrible irony.
MM:
It had its reasons.
Michael Martin
Bacon's work started in earnest from 1616 forward.
> As the Queen refused to patronize poets (including
> her son Oxford), the Protestant coterie relocated
> to Wilton where they were patronized by the Countess
> of Pembroke.
Perhaps the Queen kept her patronizing of the Wilton Cult at a low
profile, at the request of Shakespeare?
> In Pseudonymous Shakespeare, Penny McCarthy
> situates a 15-year old Stratford butcher lad at Wilton
> Upon Avon and makes him Mary's lover.
Who knows?
> McCarthy is the best close reader of the text I've ever encountered
> but she has one debilitating characteristic, SHE'S A STRAT.
If she's a Strat, she gets credit for being correct.
> Everything must be bent to the Strats.
Param Sant Param Dayal Faqir Chand wrote a book titled, "Truth Always
Wins."
Michael Martin
[...]
> The resolution was sent to the Queen who ignored
> it. Bacon writes two letters to Burghley attempting
> to get Burghley to lobby the Queen (as Burghley had
> promised years earlier) but noting [sic] comes of it except
> for Bacon's threat to become "a mere seller of books,"
> when [sic] threat Bacon in fact carries out.
>
> As the Queen refused to patronize poets (including
> her son Oxford),
"...her son Oxford"??!! Of course, the Streitz/Beauclerk scenario
is completely demented, so who better to embrace it eagerly and
credulously than Elizabeth?
[...]
[...]
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> have claimed that Francis Bacon (22 January 1561 – 9 April 1626), the
> >> English philosopher, statesman, scientist, and author, was a member of
> >> secret societies; a smaller number claim that he was an Ascended
> >> Master and was reincarnated.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Really?!
> > Are you among those who believe that he was reincarnated, Art?
> No.
Well, that's a relief -- at least you're still saner than some,
although only just.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> Francis Bacon often gathered with the men at Gray's Inn to discuss
> >> politics and philosophy, and to try out various theatrical scenes
> >> that he admitted writing.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
Huh? What's that you've attributed to me, Art? It's not my style
-- I'm generally wordier than that.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Huh?
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> Bacon's alleged connection to the Rosicrucians and the Freemasons
> >> has been widely discussed by authors and scholars in many books.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > "...has been widely discussed by authors and scholars..."?
> > *Which" "authors and scholars"?
> They are too numerous to mention.
I'm not asking you to mention *all* of them, Art; just a handful
will suffice. You must be adopting Elizabeth's "methods," Art!
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> However others, including Daphne du Maurier (in her biography
> >> of Bacon), have argued there is no substantive evidence to
> >> support claims of involvement with the Rosicrucians.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > "No substantive evidence" is, if anything, an understatement.
> ---------------------------------------------
> http://www.sirbacon.org/windingstair.htm
>
> <<The suggestion that the description of the voyage in New Atlantis
> may have been based on The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffics
> and Discoveries of the English Nation by Rev. Richard Hakluyt first
> published in 1589 is new (and credible), since both men had shares in
> the Virginia Company; and we were pleased to see the reminder that Dr.
> Frances Yates in the Rosicrucian Enlightenment believed that Bacon
> based his Utopian fable on the famous Manifestos. The comment that
> there is no proof that Francis belonged to "any mystical or other
> secret society" is less convincing, however, since "proof" was the
> last thing he would have wanted. The raison d'etre of any secret
> society particularly one devoted to the advancement of the human race
> sub rosa would have been lost.>>
You prove my point _ipso facto_, Art: "No substantive evidence" is,
if anything, an understatement.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> Sink.
I see that you have no more idea what a credible source is than
Elizabeth does, Art. I recall your "A source is a source, of course,
of course" discussion with Dr. Stritmatter, in which you admitted not
knowing what a primary source was; now we find that you don't know
what a source is *period*, so your bafflement at the notion of a
primary source is thereby clarified.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> as a Masonic banquet. This banquet was to pay tribute to Sir
> >> Francis Bacon. Only those of the Rosicrosse (Rosicrucians) and the
> >> Masons who were already aware of Bacon's leadership role were invited.
> >> The tables were T-tables with gleaming white drapery, silver, and
> >> decorations of flowers. The poet Ben Jonson, a long-time friend of
> >> Bacon, gave a Masonic ode to Bacon that day.
> >
> >> There was a depth of love by a large body of men toward Bacon,
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Bacon must have enjoyed that!
> You know that from personal experience, Dave?
Don't be absurd, Art; I am speculating based upon the available
information about Bacon's sexual orientation. (Oxford would not have
enjoyed such a gathering as much, since he reputedly preferred
underaged boys.)
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> similar to some degree
> >>in the manner that disciples love a Master. This is
> >> especially true when taking into account his membership
> >> (and some say leadership)
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > "...some say..."? *Who* says? Source?
> Sink.
I see that you have no more idea what a credible source is than
Elizabeth does, Art. I recall your "A source is a source, of course,
of course" discussion with Dr. Stritmatter, in which you admitted not
knowing what a primary source was; now we find that you don't know
what a source is *period*, so your bafflement at the notion of a
primary source is thereby clarified.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> of secret societies such as the Rosicrucians and
> >> Freemasons. In the inner esoteric membership, which included Francis
> >> Bacon, vows of celibacy for spiritual reasons were encouraged.
> >
> >> Faked death theory
> >
> >> Various authors
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > "Various authors"? *Which* authors? Source?
> "A man so various, that he seemed to be Not one, but all mankind's
> epitome."
> - Dryden.
"I stood by the duke at the door, and I see that every man that
went in had his pockets bulging, or something muffled up under his
coat -- and I see it warn't no perfumery, neither, not by a long
sight. I smelt sickly eggs by the barrel, and rotten cabbages, and
such things; and if I know the signs of a dead cat being around, and I
bet I do, there was sixty-four of them went in. I shoved in there for
a minute, but it was too various for me; I couldn't stand it."
-Twain
More to the point, I see that you have no more idea what a credible
source is than Elizabeth does, Art. I recall your "A source is a
source, of course, of course" discussion with Dr. Stritmatter, in
which you admitted not knowing what a primary source was; now we find
that you don't know what a source is *period*, so your bafflement at
the notion of a primary source is thereby clarified.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> have written that there were indications that Francis
> >> Bacon had gone into debt while secretly funding the publishing of
> >> materials for the Freemasons, Rosicrucians, "Spear-Shakers",
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Francis Bacon secretly funded Stephanie Caruana's publication?!
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> "Knights of the Helmet",
> >> as well as publishing, with the assistance of Ben Jonson,
> >> a selection of the plays that they believe he had written
> >> under the pen name of "Shake-Speare" in a "First Folio" in 1623.
> >> Furthermore, they allege
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > "They allege"? *Who* alleges?
> Various authors.
"I stood by the duke at the door, and I see that every man that
went in had his pockets bulging, or something muffled up under his
coat -- and I see it warn't no perfumery, neither, not by a long
sight. I smelt sickly eggs by the barrel, and rotten cabbages, and
such things; and if I know the signs of a dead cat being around, and I
bet I do, there was sixty-four of them went in. I shoved in there for
a minute, but it was too various for me; I couldn't stand it."
-Twain
More to the point, I see that you have no more idea what a credible
source is than Elizabeth does, Art. I recall your "A source is a
source, of course, of course" discussion with Dr. Stritmatter, in
which you admitted not knowing what a primary source was; now we find
that you don't know what a source is *period*, so your bafflement at
the notion of a primary source is thereby clarified.
> Allege, v. t. [OE. aleggen to bring forward as evidence, fr.
> an assumed LL. exlitigare; L. ex + litigare to quarrel, sue.]
Yes, I know the meaning of the word, Art -- but congratulations
upon having looked it up yourself! You may learn something yet -- if
your memory is not too dysfunctional to retain it, as your amnesia in
the "Dames" thread ominously suggests.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> that Bacon faked his own death, crossed the
> >> English Channel, and secretly traveled in disguise after 1626 through
> >> France, Germany, Poland, Hungary, and other areas utilizing the secret
> >> network of Freemasons and Rosicrucians that he was associated with. It
> >> is alleged
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > "It is alleged"? By *whom*? Source?
> Sink?
I see that you have no more idea what a credible source is than
Elizabeth does, Art. I recall your "A source is a source, of course,
of course" discussion with Dr. Stritmatter, in which you admitted not
knowing what a primary source was; now we find that you don't know
what a source is *period*, so your bafflement at the notion of a
primary source is thereby clarified.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> that he continued to write under pseudonyms, as he had done
> >> before 1626, continuing to write as late as 1670
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Really?! In 1670, Bacon would have been 109 years old!
> He was packed in snow most of that time.
Chicken might be presERVEd that way, but not bacon, Art.
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> (aka Noonedafter) wrote:
> >>
> >> (using the pseudonym
> >> "Comte De Gabalis"). Elinor Von Le Coq, wife of Professor Von Le Coq
> >> in Berlin, stated that she had found evidence in the German Archives
> >> that Francis Bacon stayed after 1626 with the family of Johannes
> >> Valentinus Andreae in Germany.
> >
> >> Beginning early in the 20th century in the United States,
> >> a number of Ascended Master Teachings organizations
> >> began making the claim that Francis Bacon had never died.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@Dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Are you among those who believe that Bacon neVER died, Art?
> No.
Well, that's a relief, Art -- you remain saner than some, but only
just.
[...]
> > No.
> Well, that's a relief -- at least you're still saner than some,
> although only just.
Well, if David Webb can provide a better explanation for the different
destinies, with which we are born, let him post it. Otherwise, his
allegation is meaningless. Does Webb know from where he came, before
his mother's womb, for example? He acts like he has all the answers.
Let's see him deal with that one.
Michael Martin
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Et ille respondens ait: Tu dicis.
--
John W Kennedy
"The grand art mastered the thudding hammer of Thor
And the heart of our lord Taliessin determined the war."
-- Charles Williams. "Mount Badon"