"To be ignorant of what happened before one was born
is to remain ever a child"
- Cicero (106-43 B.C.E.), Orator (55 B.C.E.)
"Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts
and frets his hour upon the stage"
- William Shakespeare (1564-1616), Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 5
"History is little more than the register of the crimes, follies,
and misfortunes of mankind" - William Gibbon (1737-94)
"Thus times do shift; each thing his turn does hold; new things succeed
as former things grow old" - Robert Herrick (1591-1674)
"He is come to open the purple testament of bleeding war"
- William Shakespeare, Richard II, Act 3, Scene 3
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt
of in your philosophy" - William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 5
"People are inexterminable - like flies and bed-bugs. There will
always be some that survive in cracks and crevices - that's us."
- Robert Frost (1874-1963)
-----------------------------------------------------
Art Neuendorffer
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.tlwinslow.com/timeline/
>
> "To be ignorant of what happened before one was born
> is to remain ever a child"
> - Cicero (106-43 B.C.E.), Orator (55 B.C.E.)
"Never schooled and yet learned"
--William Shakespeare
>
> "Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player that struts
> and frets his hour upon the stage"
> - William Shakespeare (1564-1616), Macbeth, Act 5, Scene 5
>
> "History is little more than the register of the crimes, follies,
> and misfortunes of mankind" - William Gibbon (1737-94)
>
> "Thus times do shift; each thing his turn does hold; new things succeed
> as former things grow old" - Robert Herrick (1591-1674)
"By the Thames turbid waters,
Men abruptly tumble down
Is it plague, or is it cholera?
Or a sign Macheath's in town?
-- Trans. John Willett circa 1932
> "He is come to open the purple testament of bleeding war"
> - William Shakespeare, Richard II, Act 3, Scene 3
>
> "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt
> of in your philosophy" - William Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act 1, Scene 5
>
> "People are inexterminable - like flies and bed-bugs. There will
> always be some that survive in cracks and crevices - that's us."
> - Robert Frost (1874-1963)
"If you want to have an intelligent conversation with me
you'll have to pry it from my cold, dead brain."
--Charlatan Heston
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> "Never schooled and yet learned"
> --William Shakespeare
Apparantly Greg is quite ignorant of what happened before he was born;
those who wish to remain ever a child should heed what he has to say.
Art
Over 500 books within 10 miles of Art's home, each
of an independent source, proclaim in agreement with
each other who it was that wrote the works of Shakespeare.
SO not only does Art fail to spell "apparent," he fails to
understand its meaning. Art owns many books that say
Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the plays, yet Art owns
NO books calling this man a boob. Art made it up--he learned
it nowhere, man. He can only cite himself because it is not
a p p a r e n t.
Art ignores the apparent, the verifiable.
Art adheres to his own obscure VERsion.
That's his pleasure.
Art locks himself in a deathcage of confusion
and roars his murderous search engines in a frantic
treadmill of huf 'n puffery.
That's ours.
Ever a child? That's being kind.
He was basically bonsai'd.
Greg
> Art Neuendorffer wrote:
>
> > Apparantly Greg is quite ignorant of what happened before he was born;
> > those who wish to remain ever a child should heed what he has to say.
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Over 500 books within 10 miles of Art's home, each
> of an independent source, proclaim in agreement with
> each other who it was that wrote the works of Shakespeare.
If you had upped that to 20 miles you could have included the Folger &
the Library of Congress.
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> SO not only does Art fail to spell "apparent,"
> he fails to understand its meaning.
FIE on thee, jolt-head! thou canst not read:
-----------------------------------------------
Sal. It is apparant foule-play, and 'tis shame
That Greatnesse should so grossely offer it;
So thriue it in your game, and so farewell.
-- King John (Folio) Act 4, Scene 2
-----------------------------------------------
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art owns many books that say
> Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the plays,
Art owns books that say a lot of silly things; e.g.,:
<<I see, or rather hear, the Shakespeare family sitting around the table
in the drawing room of New Place, with one of those madrigal scores open
before them. These were printed in such a way that a part was readable
from any one of for angles. Susanna, I think, was a clear soprano, a
clever sight-reader. Judith had not much of a voice and was so slow at
picking up a part that she became a dumb listener. Hall, the son-in-law,
was a bass. Anne was a grave contralto. Will was certainly a tenor.>>
- Shakespeare (p.230, Anthony Burgess)
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> yet Art owns NO books calling this man a boob.
Art owns many books which IMPLY this man was a boob.
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art made it up--he learned
> it nowhere, man. He can only cite himself because it is not
> a p p a r e n t.
It is apparant foule-play, and 'tis shame
That Gregnesse should so grossely offer it.
["The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose."]
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art ignores the apparent, the verifiable.
[A VERi fresh-fish here--FIE, fie, fie]
FIE, fie, unreverend tongue!
You will not touch the TRUE prince; no, FIE!
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art adheres to his own obscure VERsion.
> That's his pleasure.
> Art locks himself in a deathcage of confusion
> and roars his murderous search engines
> in a frantic treadmill of huf 'n puffery.
It's all Cecil's fault!
Dishonest "Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> That's ours.
>
> Ever a child? That's being kind.
> He was basically bonsai'd.
"Fie upon thee! Art not ashamed?"
Art Neuendorffer
"So thriue it in your game, and so farewell."
> Art Neuendorffer wrote:
>
> > Apparantly Greg is quite ignorant of what happened before he was born;
> > those who wish to remain ever a child should heed what he has to say.
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Over 500 books within 10 miles of Art's home, each
> of an independent source, proclaim in agreement with
> each other who it was that wrote the works of Shakespeare.
If you had upped that to 20 miles you could have
included the Folger & the Library of Congress.
----------------------------------------------------
Shakespeare authorship controversy
available at Questia:
books: 5057
journal articles: 284
magazine articles: 60
http://www.questia.com/SM.qst?act=search&keywordsSearchType=1000&keywords=Sh
akespeare%20and%20authorship
----------------------------------------------------
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> SO not only does Art fail to spell "apparent,"
> he fails to understand its meaning.
FIE on thee, jolt-head! thou canst not read:
-----------------------------------------------
Sal. It is apparant foule-play, and 'tis shame
That Greatnesse should so grossely offer it;
So thriue it in your game, and so farewell.
-- King John (Folio) Act 4, Scene 2
-----------------------------------------------
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art owns many books that say
> Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the plays,
Art owns books that say a lot of silly things; e.g.,:
<<I see, or rather hear, the Shakespeare family sitting around the table
in the drawing room of New Place, with one of those madrigal scores open
before them. These were printed in such a way that a part was readable
from any one of for angles. Susanna, I think, was a clear soprano, a
clever sight-reader. Judith had not much of a voice and was so slow at
picking up a part that she became a dumb listener. Hall, the son-in-law,
was a bass. Anne was a grave contralto. Will was certainly a tenor.>>
- Shakespeare (p.230, Anthony Burgess)
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> yet Art owns NO books calling this man a boob.
Art owns many books which IMPLY this man was a boob.
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art made it up--he learned
> it nowhere, man. He can only cite himself because it is not
> a p p a r e n t.
It is apparant foule-play, and 'tis shame
That Gregnesse should so grossely offer it.
["The devil can cite Scripture for his purpose."]
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art ignores the apparent, the verifiable.
[A VERi fresh-fish here--FIE, fie, fie]
FIE, fie, unreverend tongue!
You will not touch the TRUE prince; no, FIE!
"Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> Art adheres to his own obscure VERsion.
> That's his pleasure.
> Art locks himself in a deathcage of confusion
> and roars his murderous search engines
> in a frantic treadmill of huf 'n puffery.
It's all Cecil's fault!
Dishonest "Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> That's ours.
>
> Ever a child? That's being kind.
> He was basically bonsai'd.
"Fie upon thee! Art not ashamed?"
(aneuendor...@comicass.nut) wrote:
> > > > > ----------------------------------------------------
> > > > > http://www.tlwinslow.com/timeline/
> > > > >
> > > > > "To be ignorant of what happened before
> > > > > one was born is to remain ever a child"
> > > > > - Cicero (106-43 B.C.E.), Orator (55 B.C.E.)
> > > "Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
> > >
> > > > "Never schooled and yet learned"
> > > > --William Shakespeare
> > Art Neuendorffer wrote:
> >
> > > Apparantly Greg is quite ignorant of what happened before he was born;
> > > those who wish to remain ever a child [sic] should heed what he has to
> > > say.
Since Art believes that Anne Hathaway was Shakespeare's mother, that
Aleksandr Nevskii was tsar, and that Virgil predated Herodotus, anyone
who wishes to remain eVER an infant should heed what he has to say! It
would indeed be difficult to find ANYONE who knows less about what
happened before he was born -- or since he was born, for that matter --
than aneuendor...@comicass.nut!
> "Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
>
> > Over 500 books within 10 miles of Art's home, each
> > of an independent source, proclaim in agreement with
> > each other who it was that wrote the works of Shakespeare.
> If you had upped that to 20 miles you could have
> included the Folger & the Library of Congress.
...the vast majority of whose books are in robust agreement that
William Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the Shakespeare canon.
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Shakespeare authorship controversy
> available at Questia:
>
> books: 5057
More proof, if any were needed, that aneuendor...@comicass.nut
does not know how to use a search engine! If Art had actually LOOKED AT
a few of the 5057 titles that his incompetent search disgorged, he would
have discoVERed that most are perfectly ordinary works of mainstream
Shakespeare scholarship having no bearing upon the Shakespeare
authorship "question," works that Art himself would designate as
"Stratfordian." A few examples include the following:
----------------------------
88.
The English History Play in the Age of Shakespeare
Book by Irving Ribner ; Princeton University Press, 1957
Subjects:
English Drama--Early Modern And Elizabethan--History And Criticism,
Historical Drama, English--Bibliography ,Historical Drama,
English--History And Criticism
90.
The Tudor Drama: A History of English National Drama to the Retirement
of Shakespeare
Book by Tucker Brooke ; Houghton Mifflin Company, 1911
Subjects:
English Drama--Early Modern And Elizabethan--History And Criticism
85.
William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
Book by Harold Bloom ,William Shakespeare ; Chelsea House, 2000
Subjects:
Tragedy ,Shakespeare, William--1564-1616--Romeo And Juliet
[If Art doubts that Bloom thinks that Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare,
then he hasn't been paying attention.]
113.
Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth
Book by A. C. Bradley ; Macmillan, 1905
Subjects:
Fiction ,Shakespeare, William--1564-1616--Tragedies
[If Art doubts that Bradley thinks that Shakespeare wrote Shakespeare,
then he hasn't been paying attention.]
--------------------------------
Apparently Art believes that eVERy item that contains the keywords
"Shakespeare" and "authorship" pertains to the Shakespeare authorship
"question"! Evidently Art is the sort of library user who, when seeking
material about acid rain, types his query in such a way that the search
engine returns all material containing both the words "acid" and "rain,"
even if separated by hundreds of pages! But this is par for the course
for many Oxfordians, as the _Frontline_ documentary showed. Art's
search engine virtuosity is almost as funny as that of Elizabeth Weird,
who recently opined that
"Google shows I posted from boldplanet.com a total of
6 times yet Google also shows 267 instances of of
elizabe...@boldplanet.com. The difference between
6 and 267 is apparently the number of times KQJim has
spammed HLAS with his list of Baker pseuds."
What is even funnier is that of the few books in the list that
actually pertain to the Shakespeare authorship "question," many are
well-known works decisively REFUTING the nonsense of Oxfordians and
Baconians! Under the link labeled "Best of the Library - Browse
librarian-selected resources on popular research topics. [...]
Shakespeare Authorship Controversy," the "librarian-selected resources"
include only a small handful of ant-Stratfordian works (Whalen, Twain,
etc.); the others are books like E. K. Chambers's _William Shakespeare:
A Study of Facts and Problems_ and the Friedman's _The Shakespearean
Ciphers Examined: An Analysis of Cryptographic Systems Used as Evidence
That Some Author Other Than William Shakespeare Wrote the Plays Commonly
Attributed to Him_.
> journal articles: 284
> magazine articles: 60
>
> http://www.questia.com/SM.qst?act=search&keywordsSearchType=1000&keywords=Sh
> akespeare%20and%20authorship
If this were by anyone but Art, one would rank it, along with Okay
Fine's inability to read Terry Ross's article beyond the fourth sentence
and Stephanie Caruana's Caxton contretemps, as farcical incompetence at
its funniest! HoweVER, when compared with the rest of Art's ouevre, it
must compete with the post in which Art suggested that the addressee of
Sonnet 20 is the Earl of Oxford's penis, with the post in which Art
announced the demise of Peter Gay, with the post in which Art unveiled
the anagram "I kill Edwasd de Vese [sic]," and with many other classic
displays of Art's truly monumental incompetence.
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> "Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
>
> > SO not only does Art fail to spell "apparent,"
> > he fails to understand its meaning.
What do you expect, Greg? Art doesn't know how to use a dictionary,
as his post on "moniment" showed conclusively. It was almost as funny
as Pat Dooley's post on "utter"!
[...]
> "Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
>
> > Art owns many books that say
> > Shakespeare of Stratford wrote the plays,
> Art owns books that say a lot of silly things; e.g.,:
>
> <<I see, or rather hear, the Shakespeare family sitting around the table
> in the drawing room of New Place, with one of those madrigal scores open
> before them. These were printed in such a way that a part was readable
> from any one of for angles. Susanna, I think, was a clear soprano, a
> clever sight-reader. Judith had not much of a voice and was so slow at
> picking up a part that she became a dumb listener. Hall, the son-in-law,
> was a bass. Anne was a grave contralto. Will was certainly a tenor.>>
> - Shakespeare (p.230, Anthony Burgess)
Art evidently cannot distinguish Anthony Burgess's VERy personal and
imaginative riff, which makes no pretense to scholarship, with actual
historical scholarship! No wonder Art's attempts at the latter are such
farcical fiascos!
> "Greg Reynolds" <eve...@core.com> wrote
>
> > yet Art owns NO books calling this man a boob.
> Art owns many books which IMPLY this man was a boob.
The illiterate District Heights boob owns many books?! Which ones?
Incidentally, Art, when are you going to send me the copies of Landau
and Lifschitz, as you promised? Clearly the illiterate District Heights
boob has no use whateVER for them.
[...]
> > Art adheres to his own obscure VERsion.
> > That's his pleasure.
> > Art locks himself in a deathcage of confusion
> > and roars his murderous search engines
> > in a frantic treadmill of huf 'n puffery.
The feeble-minded should not be entrusted with sharp objects, if only
for their own safety. HoweVER, those whose intellects do not even rise
to the level of feeble-minded should not even be entrusted with utterly
innocuous tools like search engines. Art's posts regularly display the
amusing outcomes possible when this prudent safety measure is carelessly
disregarded.
[...]