UFOs in Stratford, again.
book...@yahoo.com
(quote)
THEY’RE BACK! UFOS SIGHTED AGAIN OVER TOWN
NEARLY a year after a number of UFOs were spotted in the skies above
Stratford-upon-Avon, mysterious objects have returned to spook local
residents.
Last July five unidentified flying objects were spotted drifting
slowly across the Saturday night sky, but they were later confirmed to
be “Chinese lanterns” that had been released after a wedding.
Now another UFO sighting has been captured on video by a man in
Stratford, while other bright objects were spotted on the same night.
He had been standing in the car park of the Holiday Inn on Saturday
night when it happened.
(unquote)
Lyra
bookb...@yahoo.com wrote:
```````````````````
Interesting story -
Britain seems to be visited by a lot of UFOs lately -
not far from Stratford - Wales and Shropshire -
(quote)
The green green men of home
War of the Welsh ... Dr Griffey's snap of UFO
Related Stories
Ready ... Sun's Nick Francis with equipment at UFO camp
The Sun team’s waiting for UFOs
THE Sun has set up its own UFO camp – to scour the night sky for extra
terrestrials
* Schoolboy snaps a 'saucer'
* The latest UFO news
By JOHN COLES
Published: 27 Jun 2008
A BAFFLED university don who spotted a UFO over the Brecon Beacons
last night said: “There is no logical explanation.”
Dr Simon Griffey saw lights loom over a mountain village – before they
disappeared.
His close encounter is the third reported in the space of just five
days, following sightings by the Army and police.
WATCH AMAZING FOOTAGE OF UFO SIGHTINGS HERE
Simon, a doctor of psychology at Cardiff University, said: “I’ve had
loads of theories proposed by friends and neighbours but none of them
add up.”
Doctor spot ... Simon Griffey
Dr Griffey, 50, and his son Jack, 23, were driving near Llangynidr
Mountain in the Brecon Beacons, Powys, when they spotted lights over
Talybont-on-Usk.
He said: “There was no noise whatsoever, it was a bit eerie. I’ve
driven over this mountain for 17 years and have never seen anything
like it.
“There were seven lights and having read the description from the
soldiers in Shropshire, there are some similarities. They were the
same sort of colour and the same spherical shape that they reported.
“I know I wasn’t seeing things because Jack saw exactly the same as I
did – and two other cars pulled over to look.”
Do you believe in extra-terrestrial life? Vote below.
click here to cast your vote
Sceptics have suggested the sightings could be huge man-made lanterns
floating into the sky.
But the boffin, of Llangynidr, said: “It was too big. It was way above
the horizon and stayed there for 15 minutes. It was a bit smaller than
a full moon – quite big and high up.”
Jack recorded the phenomenon on his mobile phone – but when they
examined the pictures later, they found only three of the seven lights
showed up.
Sightings ... where the UFOs have been spotted this month
Dr Griffey said: “The police helicopter crew said they failed to
record the sighting on their equipment.
“If it had been a natural phenomenon you surely would have been able
to photograph all of it. I’d like someone to explain – because I have
no idea what to make of it.”
He added: “I think it’s plausible that there could be life on other
planets.”
Click here to watch more amazing UFO footage and read out of this
world stories on our new UFO page.
The close encounter at 11.40pm on Thursday, June 12 came at a place
which lies almost directly between the Tern Hill barracks and St Athan
– scenes of sightings days earlier.
The Sun told on Tuesday how three soldiers saw 13 UFOs spinning at
11pm on Saturday, June 7.
Just over 90 minutes later and 80 miles away the crew of the South
Wales police chopper reported a UFO as it tried to land at St Athan.
Yesterday we revealed three women’s claims they were abducted by
aliens on the A5 – also in Shrops – in 1981. Expert Nick Pope, who
investigated UFOs for the MoD, wants an official inquiry into the
sightings.
THE BBC yesterday denied that a UFO spotted in South Wales was a prop
from Dr Who, filmed in Cardiff. It said: “The show was not in
production at the time.”
Spotted a UFO? Call The Sun on 0207 782 4104
Share this article What is this?
DIGGDigg it!
DEL.ICIO.USdel.icio.us
MYSPACEMySpace
FACEBOOKFacebook
FARKFark
REDDITReddit
NOWPUBLICNowPublic
* Back to Top
* E-mail this page to a friend
* Print this page
HAVE YOUR SAY
Tell us what you think of this story
DISCUSSIONS
Share your views on this story, in real time, on our discussion boards
Discuss - Discussion Section
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/ufos/article1347649.ece
lackpurity
>
> - Show quoted text -
MM:
Thanks for the info, Lyra. Enjoyed your message, also, Bookburn.
They might be from Zeta Reticuli, no kidding. If not from there, they
could be from other stars/planetary systems. I would be inclined to
go with the extraterrestrial explanations, rather than to think they
were Chinese Baloons. LOL
Michael Martin
Roundtable
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> MM:
> Thanks for the info, Lyra. Enjoyed your message, also, Bookburn.
>
> They might be from Zeta Reticuli, no kidding. If not from there, they
> could be from other stars/planetary systems. I would be inclined to
> go with the extraterrestrial explanations, rather than to think they
> were Chinese Baloons. LOL
>
>
> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
I saw something dark that blotted out the stars, once, but you never
know, maybe it was a balloon.
RT, also known as...Melanie aka ...not John Baker.
Haha! Finally logged on with my proper HLAS name!
Like anyone cares.
art
>
> How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
Almost everyone I would assume.
It is quite a different question from:
How many people on HLAS actually believe
that the earth is visited by advanced extraterrestrials?
> I saw something dark that blotted out the stars, once,
> but you never know, maybe it was a balloon.
One shouldn't fly (untethered) balloons at night.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUi6s2Xp4MM
Art Neuendorffer
conra...@gmail.com
>
> How many people on HLAS actually believe
> that the earth is visited by advanced extraterrestrials?
Well, you're here, Art.
C.
art
> >
> > How many people on HLAS actually believe
> > that the earth is visited by advanced extraterrestrials?
I'm just a highly advanced terrestrial.
book...@yahoo.com
<lancelo...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On 1 Jul., 04:52, lackpurity <lackpur...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 30, 1:27 pm, Lyra <M.Q.at....@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > bookb...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> > > In today's Stratford Herald
>>
>> > > (quote)
>> > > THEY?RE BACK! UFOS SIGHTED AGAIN OVER TOWN
>> > > NEARLY a year after a number of UFOs were spotted in the skies above
>> > > Stratford-upon-Avon, mysterious objects have returned to spook local
>> > > residents.
>>
>> > > Last July five unidentified flying objects were spotted drifting
>> > > slowly across the Saturday night sky, but they were later confirmed to
>> > > be ?Chinese lanterns? that had been released after a wedding.
I like the Chinese Baloon theory of UFO attribution.
Some author attribution proponents come across like that, too. They
are like drones from a mother ship, sent out to do crop circles and
fool with abductees. All part of a conspiracy of government to cover
up and mimic identities, of course. Anyone silly enough to admit they
were taken aboard gets implanted with a chip and telephone number sold
to spammers.
To demonstrate proof of the Chinese balloon strategy of UFO mimicry,
Shakespeare attribution devotees can try floating some, possibly at
night and above recent crop circles or Area 51. You could make a hot
air balloon out of paper straws, crazy glue, a birthday candle, and a
thin plastic bag of the sort used by dry cleaners. No puns on this,
please. bookburn
conra...@gmail.com
Not with all you dish out. Hyper-link-wise.
Go ahead; you can ask the real question. What you really want to
know, to send back in your report. How many people here believe that
when Shakespeare talked about Mars and Venus, he was talking about the
Roman deities, rather than his itinerary. Or rather, how many of
those who believe that ...are people.
Conrad.
ps - I was going to respond to bookburn's post, but he forbade me.
And anyway it was balooney.
C.
Greg Reynolds
Act IV, Scene II:
HUBERT: My lord, they say five moons were seen to-night;
Four fixed, and the fifth did whirl about
The other four in wondrous motion.
KING JOHN: Five moons!
HUBERT: Old men and beldams in the streets
Do prophesy upon it dangerously:
Young Arthur's death is common in their mouths:
And when they talk of him, they shake their heads
And whisper one another in the ear;
And he that speaks doth gripe the hearer's wrist,
Whilst he that hears makes fearful action,
With wrinkled brows, with nods, with rolling eyes.
I saw a smith stand with his hammer, thus,
The whilst his iron did on the anvil cool,
With open mouth swallowing a tailor's news;
Who, with his shears and measure in his hand,
Standing on slippers, which his nimble haste
Had falsely thrust upon contrary feet,
Told of a many thousand warlike French
That were embattailed and rank'd in Kent:
Another lean unwash'd artificer
Cuts off his tale and talks of Arthur's death.
+++++
What are the five moons? (Beldams are old ugly women, hags.)
Since the analogy goes nowhere else, and since seeing
five moons is not factual, here is an interpretation:
There are five claimants to the throne of England by this point
of the play.
John has taken the throne (though it was granted to him
in the will of his brother, Richard the Lion Heart which is not
mentioned in the play and it is debatable whether Richard can
name his successor) and his own mother Elinor backs his claim.
Arthur is the legitimate son of Richard, and his mother,
the widow of Richard, Constance, has pleaded for the
coronation of her son, Arthur, since the beginning.
Philip Faulconbridge is the obvious son of Richard the
Lion Heart--everyone agrees he looks just like him,
even more so than does Arthur. But Philip was not
the child of Richard's queen (Constance?), and is illegitimate.
King Philip of France has arrived to plead the case for
Arthur, but we see he is not loyal to Arthur and deals
him out by the 4th Act, allowing us to believe that
King Philip is in it for himself.
The Dauphin, Lewis, King Philip's son, is brought into the
mix as a peace gesture to marry Blanch, the neice of
John, thereby uniting England and France. When the
peace is instead broken, Dauphin Lewis still presses his case that
his marriage to Blanch (we don't see them wed and it is
a messy gathering with a wedding party that dissolves into
war) has given him England.
So there are the five moons, and it is presumably Arthur,
at present believed dead (and soon to be dead accidentally
anyway) who is the moon whirling about in wonder. Or
is it John, who is confusing both his own lords and the French,
who is the whirling moon?
Is there another explanation of the five moons?
Greg Reynolds
lackpurity
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > MM:
> > Thanks for the info, Lyra. Enjoyed your message, also, Bookburn.
>
> > They might be from Zeta Reticuli, no kidding. If not from there, they
> > could be from other stars/planetary systems. I would be inclined to
> > go with the extraterrestrial explanations, rather than to think they
> > were Chinese Baloons. LOL
>
> > Michael Martin- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
>
> How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
MM:
I saw one hovering over a lonely stretch of highway in Mexico, about
20 years ago. It was ahaped like two plates put together, in other
words, the classic saucer shape. It was about 30 feet wide and it was
about 20 feet above the road. It was tilted about 30 deg. from
horizontal. I was driving probably around 65 mph. and I realized it
was too late to stop, that I was going right under the UFO.
Incidentally, the UFO was silver colored with an ethereal fog around
it. From the bottom a bright white light was shining down on the
road. The white light was wide enough to cover the road, and I went
smack into it. Entering that light was like going into another
dimension, all the sounds were muffled. Interior lights were blinking
off and on. They were still blinking off and on, some twelve hours
later. There was something like a floating sensation, as I wasn't
feeling the bumps in the road. That highway was not exactly the
smoothest I ever drove on. I don't know how much time was lost, but
maybe 10 or 15 seconds, then apparently, the UFO flew away, and
everything came back to normal.
I've been inside UFOs with the greys, via meditation. Quite often,
they are astral, or more accurately sub-astral. When I was inside
their saucer with them, I heard a humming sound, and it seemed we went
about a million miles out in space in two seconds. The earth looked
like a star. The Greys were communicating with each other. It
sounded sort of like a combination buzzing chirping sounds, they were
making. I have no idea what they were saying. They knew I was there,
but they were not aggressive, and just seemed a bit curious about me,
as I was about them. Then, I came back into my body.
> I saw something dark that blotted out the stars, once, but you never
> know, maybe it was a balloon.
MM:
That's interesting, Roundtable. Could you tell us anymore about it?
What shape was it? What speed was it going? Anything?
> RT, also known as...Melanie aka ...not John Baker.
> Haha! Finally logged on with my proper HLAS name!
> Like anyone cares.
MM:
We're old friends. Don't forget it.
Michael Martin
art
>>
>> How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
Well, that explains a lot.
nordicskiv2
This won't do, Art -- what became of your comicass.nut ISP? Don't
you know that the "G" in "gmail" is Masonic?
> Melanie wrote:
>
> > How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
> Almost everyone I would assume.
Especially among non-birders, who cannot identify most of what
they see in flight.
> It is quite a different question from:
>
> How many people on HLAS actually believe
> that the earth is visited by advanced extraterrestrials?
The percentage of those who believe the latter is surely MUCH
higher among anti-Stratfordians than among the sane.
[...]
lackpurity
MM:
You, apparently, know little about what is going on, regarding the
many UFO sightings and abductions by extraterrestrials.
The percentage might be higher, but the percentage who chose Barabbas
over Christ was higher, also. IOW, your statement doesn't mean much
to those interested in the truth.
Michael Martin
lackpurity
MM:
Well, don't be shy. What does it explain, according to you?
Michael Martin
conra...@gmail.com
He's saying you're crazy, Michael.
Ofc, it *is* Art speaking.
Conrad.
art
>
> This won't do, Art -
> - what became of your comicass.nut ISP?
What comicass.nut ISP?
.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Don't you know that the "G" in "gmail" is Masonic?
. Is that a fact.
(Perhaps, we need a G-mail [DeMolay] sorter
. to separate the G-men from the G-boys.)
>> Melanie wrote:
>
>>> How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
>> Almost everyone I would assume.
.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Especially among non-birders,
> who cannot identify most of what they see in flight.
.
I'll bet most birders cannot identify
. most of what they see *in flight* .
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It is quite a different question from:
>
>> How many people on HLAS actually believe that
>> the earth is visited by advanced extraterrestrials?
.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> The percentage of those who believe the latter is surely
> MUCH higher among anti-Stratfordians than among the sane.
It appears there is only one ET believer at HLAS
and he is a Stratfordian.
---------------------------------------------
Art Neuendorffer
lackpurity
wrote:
MM:
If he has that much unmitigated gall, then he ought to justify his
allegations. That was my point. He can't justify his position.
Nobody can disprove the extraterrestrials. They are real, just as
William Shakespeare was the REAL AUTHOR of the canon. Art is lose,
lose, both ways. LOL
Sightings of UFOs are frequent over Texas and over England, including
Stratford. Coincidence? Are they smarter than we think?
I was just setting Art up.
Michael Martin
conra...@gmail.com
Greg Reynolds
> MM:
> He can't justify his position.
> Michael Martin
BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
nordicskiv2
<4464efef-e33b-4709...@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
"conra...@gmail.com" <conra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 2, 2:36 pm, lackpurity <lackpur...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 2, 7:40?am, art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Well, that explains a lot.
> > MM:
> > Well, don't be shy. What does it explain, according to you?
> He's saying you're crazy, Michael.
>
> Ofc, it *is* Art speaking.
Art is but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly he
knows a hawk from a handsaw.
> Conrad.
conra...@gmail.com
>
> "conradc...@gmail.com" <conradc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > He's saying you're crazy, Michael.
>
> > Ofc, it *is* Art speaking.
>
> Art is but mad north-north-west: when
> the wind is southerly he knows a hawk
> from a handsaw.
I would dispute that.
C.
nordicskiv2
<15cf1997-d9c6-4cdd...@f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>,
art <acne...@gmail.com>
(acneufer@gee'mill.comedy) wrote:
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > This won't do, Art -
> > - what became of your comicass.nut ISP?
> What comicass.nut ISP?
The one you adopted when you ceased posting from
ph...@errors.comedy.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Don't you know that the "G" in "gmail" is Masonic?
> . Is that a fact.
> (Perhaps, we need a G-mail [DeMolay] sorter
> . to separate the G-men from the G-boys.)
>
> >> Melanie wrote:
> >>>
> >>> How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
> >> Almost everyone I would assume.
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Especially among non-birders,
> > who cannot identify most of what they see in flight.
> I'll bet most birders cannot identify
> . most of what they see *in flight* .
Good birders can identify an astonishing percentage of what they
see in flight, Art. Indeed, in many cases they need not even see it
-- expert birders can pick out flight calls of even comparative
rarities during nocturnal migratory flyoVERs. The great Ludlow
Griscom could identify practically eVERything he saw with only a
fleeting glimpse, even before the advent of high-end optics for the
consumer market.
<http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v082n04/p0598-p0605.pdf.>
> > art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It is quite a different question from:
> >
> >> How many people on HLAS actually believe that
> >> the earth is visited by advanced extraterrestrials?
> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
> >
> > The percentage of those who believe the latter is surely
> > MUCH higher among anti-Stratfordians than among the sane.
> It appears there is only one ET believer at HLAS
> and he is a Stratfordian.
He is an honorary anti-Stratfordian. Among the ranks of anti-
Stratfordians *at h.l.a.s. alone*, we find:
(1) a fERVent belieVER in the VERacity of the "Gemstone File," the
word-salad ravings of a paranoid schizophrenic;
(2) a belieVER in the remarkable assertion that AIDS is "a hoax";
(3) an Einstein-hater who believes that special relativity is wrong --
and, astonishingly, that Lorentz and Poincaré desERVE full credit for
it, since Einstein allegedly "plagerized" [sic] the theory;
(4) a Marlovian who believes that the Apollo lunar landings were a
NASA-fabricated hoax;
(5) a formidable linguist who believes that "vier" is Spanish for
"four";
(6) a fluid dynamics REVisionist who denies the applicability of the
Bernoulli Principle to aviation;
(7) an amateur primatologist and "aquatic apes" fancier;
(8) a self-styled mathematical "armature" [sic] who think that he has
"solved" Fermat's Last Theorem;
(9) the incoherent effusions of PWDBard, who believes in seVERal
arcane conspiracy theories but expresses himself so ineptly that is
difficult to divine what they are;
(10) another formidable linguist who thinks that "Verulam" is Latin
for "state of truth";
(11) an erudite historian who "assume[s]" that most of the German
idealist philosophers were sentenced at Nuremberg;
(12) another erudite historian who thinks that Shakespeare "was 11
years old in 1575, the year William Caxton printed the first book ever
printed in English" and that the former's education must have been
impeded by the dearth of reading material that the latter's tardiness
in printing "the first book ever printed in English" must have
occasioned;
(13) an MIT alumnus who thinks that the number 19 is remarkable for
being both the sum of two consecutive integers and the difference of
their squares.
Of course, there is much, much more, but there at any rate is a
Baker's dozen (the phrase is well chosen) of typical anti-Stratfordian
beliefs. It is small wonder that alien abduction scenarios would be
far more favorably received by anti-Stratfordians than by the sane.
Mind you, the above VERy incomplete list is derived *from h.l.a.s.
alone*; a cursory perusal of the Fellowship forum REVeals much more
comic crankery, and a desultory reading of the comments by signatories
of the Declaration of Reasonable Doubt is also most rewarding.
> ---------------------------------------------
> Art Neuendorffer
nordicskiv2
<b4254e7a-4eee-48e6...@k13g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
"conra...@gmail.com" <conra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would dispute that.
Perhaps you're right. Art is not a birder, so he might be no more
successful in distinguishing a hawk from a handsaw than he has been at
distinguishing Shakespeare's mother from Shakespeare's wife, or the 78-
year-old historian Peter J. Gay from the 54-year-old industrial plant
manager Peter A. Gay. However, Art's insanity is pretty clearly
feigned.
> C.
Jim KQKnave
>However, Art's insanity is pretty clearly feigned.
That I doubt, considering his insane need to post immediately over
every
Stratfordian post that appears, and with innumerable pseudonyms,
including
Volker Multhopp.
The Droeshout portrait is not unusual at all!
http://hometown.aol.com/kqknave/shakenbake.html
See my demolition of Monsarrat's RES paper!
http://hometown.aol.com/kqknave/monsarr1.html
Agent Jim
art
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> What comicass.nut ISP?
.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
You mean the one *YOU* adopted when you ceased
referencing my posts to p...@errors.comedy.
>>>> Melanie wrote:
>
>>>>> How many people on HLAS have actually seen a UFO?
>>>> Almost everyone I would assume.
.
>> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>> Especially among non-birders,
>>> who cannot identify most of what they see in flight.
.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'll bet most birders cannot identify
>> . most of what they see *in flight* .
.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Good birders can identify an astonishing percentage
> of what they see in flight, Art.
I can't seem to locate "astonishing percentage"
in my statistics book; would you mind defining it?
.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> Indeed, in many cases they need not even see it
> -- expert birders can pick out flight calls of even comparative
> rarities during nocturnal migratory flyoVERs. The great Ludlow
> Griscom could identify practically eVERything he saw with only
> a fleeting glimpse, even before the advent of high-end optics
> for the consumer market.
>
> <http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v082n04/p0598-p0605.pdf.>
-------------------------------------------
SURFIN' BIRD by THE TRASHMEN (GARRETT 4002, 1963)
A-well-a EVERybody's heard about the bird
B-b-b-bird, bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, well the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, well the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a bird, bird, bird, well the bird is the word
A-well-a bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a don't you know about the bird?
Well, EVERybody knows that the bird is the word!
A-well-a bird, bird, b-bird's the word
A-well-a...
-------------------------------------------
>>> art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> It is quite a different question from:
>
>>>> How many people on HLAS actually believe that
>>>> the earth is visited by advanced extraterrestrials?
>> nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
>>> The percentage of those who believe the latter is surely
>>> MUCH higher among anti-Stratfordians than among the sane.
.
> art <acneu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It appears there is only one ET believer
>> at HLAS and he is a Stratfordian.
.
nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> He is an honorary anti-Stratfordian.
Sez you.
Art Neuendorffer
conra...@gmail.com
>
> However, Art's insanity is pretty clearly feigned.
True; but that *doesn't* mean he's in his right mind.
Conrad.
art
>>
>> However, Art's insanity is pretty clearly feigned.
Jim KQKnave <kqkn...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> That I doubt, considering his insane need to post
> immediately over every Stratfordian post that appears,
> and with innumerable pseudonyms,
> including Volker Multhopp.
I may at time be a little vulgar but I have nEVER been Volker.
Art Neuendorffer
conra...@gmail.com
>
> [I snipped a bit that was for the... no, I can't do it.]
>
> > He is an honorary anti-Stratfordian.
>
> Sez you.
Really, I think Michael belongs in his own category, at least until we
find some other autobardolators.
Conrad.
Roundtable
> On Jul 3, 11:56 am, nordicskiv2 <David.L.W...@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>
> >However, Art's insanity is pretty clearly feigned.
>
> That I doubt, considering his insane need to post immediately over
> every
> Stratfordian post that appears, and with innumerable pseudonyms,
> including
> Volker Multhopp.
>
>
> See my demolition of Monsarrat's RES paper!http://hometown.aol.com/kqknave/monsarr1.html
>
> Agent Jim
Well, as far as pseudonyms are concerned...need I say more.
But of course you are fighting fire with fire, as you once said.
RT