Hi Seb,
Thanks for your answer!
On Nov 16, 4:49 pm, Seb Perez-D <
sbprzd+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 03:16, Timothee <
timothee.grol...@muvee.com> wrote:
> > I'm trying to do a 360 pano with my kids for xmas and they just won't
> > stay still, so I definitely will have to do some level of masking.
>
> You can also edit the TIF images in Gimp (or Photoshop), erasing the
> bits you don't want. A bit more cumbersome perhaps, but it works. Just
> be sure to uncheck the box "Cropped output" in the options to nona, in
> the Stitching tab.
Thank you very much for the precision, after your post, re-reading the
inkscape article, and giving both approach a try, I now understand how
this process works.
For negative masking, using gimp to erase unwanted bits is indeed the
fastest option for me. I have a large 360x180 pano (22 tif layers at
13834x6686), and the inkscape solution is hard to use because inkscape
takes too much memory: the few top layer images cannot even be loaded
on my machine, so I cannot see what I am working with :(.
That being said, the gimp solution is not so nice for positive
masking. Then again, neither is the inkscape approach. In both cases,
we basically have to erase the desired area from all pano layers
except the current one. That's a lot of boring, manual work when there
are many layers.
That's great, I will give this a try as when I can, and I certainly
look forward to having it integrated in hugin :D
regards,
Tim.