Enblend: output masks different resolution

89 views
Skip to first unread message

memecs

unread,
Oct 3, 2012, 4:42:05 AM10/3/12
to hugi...@googlegroups.com
Hello,

I am saving the output mask with the --save-mask option. However the output masks have different resolution from the final composited image. Is there a way to force the output mask to have the same resolution? That would make much easier further editing.

Thanks

Monkey

unread,
Oct 3, 2012, 7:57:40 AM10/3/12
to hugi...@googlegroups.com
Maybe you need to add --fine-mask to get a full resolution mask. If you don't need seam optimisation (which your other message suggests you don't) can I humbly suggest you give multiblend a try? :) It can be much faster than Enblend and can save/load a single seam map for the whole blend. Just make sure you don't use any anti-aliasing or transparent tools when editing the seam image, and that you keep it in 256-colour indexed mode.

memecs

unread,
Oct 3, 2012, 2:14:43 PM10/3/12
to hugi...@googlegroups.com
The point is that I am not getting the same resolution even with --fine-mask. Thanks for pointing me out multiblend. Seems to suite better my needs.

Thanks

Carlos Eduardo G. Carvalho (Cartola)

unread,
Oct 3, 2012, 5:25:22 PM10/3/12
to hugi...@googlegroups.com
Strange, here I got the same resolution even not using --fine-mask. I usually make remmaped images not cropped (nona option at the Stitcher tab in Hugin).

[ ]s,

Carlos E G Carvalho (Cartola)
http://cartola.org/360
http://www.panoforum.com.br/



2012/10/3 memecs <fedep...@gmail.com>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugi...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

memecs

unread,
Oct 4, 2012, 12:28:49 PM10/4/12
to hugi...@googlegroups.com
I think the resolution cover the bounding mask bounding box.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages