Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion morph-to-fit and Hugin with ptomorph
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bruno Postle  
View profile  
 More options Apr 20 2012, 11:23 am
From: Bruno Postle <brunopos...@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:23:15 +0100
Local: Fri, Apr 20 2012 11:23 am
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: morph-to-fit and Hugin with ptomorph

On 20 Apr 2012 15:27, "Erik Krause" <erik.kra...@gmx.de> wrote:

>> The ImageMagick morph is a 'rubber-sheet' distortion,
>> so it is much smoother.

> That sounds very nice and the result is indeed superb. The not-so-nice

distortions in the panotools version was the reason why I never
investigated further years ago...

I mean to experiment with more real data and see what problems there are,
hence this ptomorph script.

It currently uses a 'Shepards' distort, which forces each point to fit
exactly. Though ImageMagick also has a polynomial distort where it applies
a 'best fit' average. This looks promising since you can pick the order of
the polynomial, and it will apply a distortion overall, just using the
control points as a guide rather than requiring an exact fit.

So there is lots of potential here.

--
Bruno


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.