Received: by 10.216.12.200 with SMTP id 50mr64368wez.4.1299182584769;
        Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:03:04 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.216.20.18 with SMTP id o18ls510265weo.1.p; Thu, 03 Mar 2011
 12:02:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.181.202 with SMTP id l52mr90264wem.8.1299182576882;
        Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.216.181.202 with SMTP id l52mr90263wem.8.1299182576847;
        Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:02:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <br...@postle.net>
Received: from lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net (lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.148])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id q45si175607weh.8.2011.03.03.12.02.55;
        Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.173.77.148 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of br...@postle.net) client-ip=195.173.77.148;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.173.77.148 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of br...@postle.net) smtp.mail=br...@postle.net
Received: from bugbears.demon.co.uk ([80.177.204.14] helo=oink.postle.net)
	by lon1-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	id 1PvEjf-00006e-YC
	for hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 20:02:55 +0000
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 20:02:54 +0000
From: Bruno Postle <br...@postle.net>
To: Hugin ptx <hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Broken Layout
Message-ID: <20110303200252.GK16918@postle.net>
References: <20110228145638.GB7408@bitwizard.nl>
 <16008097.1103.1299170438126.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbhw19>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <16008097.1103.1299170438126.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbhw19>
X-Face: +?je=\K3V2%NTRI}N}l]g2gi?$L.3k,XskrYQ\7
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-02-10)

On Thu 03-Mar-2011 at 08:40 -0800, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
>
>If I made a real attempt to redesign some elements of hugin, UI-wise i mean,
>would anyone be interested in trying to implement it? (If anyone agreed with
>the suggestions of course)
>
>I think everyone can admit that Hugin looks like it was designed by
>engineers. Because, I guess, it was! :-) I'd like to help improve it
>visually.

Go ahead, I suggest starting with screenshots and moving things 
around - There are lots of functions that are in the wrong places.

-- 
Bruno