software <hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.58.165.34 with SMTP id yv2mr688732veb.10.1352223906475;
        Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:45:06 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.240.239 with SMTP id wd15ls738475vdc.5.gmail; Tue, 06 Nov
 2012 09:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.71.38 with SMTP id r6mr428057vdu.12.1352223903125;
        Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:45:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:45:02 -0800 (PST)
From: kevin360 <kevin...@yahoo.com>
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Message-Id: <9b6aae90-1e8c-45fa-acdf-a622e11857c2@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121105230126.GM3209@postle.net>
References: <c55e1944-932f-47e7-93c3-3bc8850ccac5@googlegroups.com>
 <20121105230126.GM3209@postle.net>
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] enblend - version 4.0 or 4.1?
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; 
	boundary="----=_Part_12_18704112.1352223902701"

------=_Part_12_18704112.1352223902701
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_13_22094443.1352223902701"

------=_Part_13_22094443.1352223902701
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks, just got it down, but getting some errors with it's output, will 
post a new thread about that.

On Monday, November 5, 2012 6:01:47 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote:
>
> On Mon 05-Nov-2012 at 14:18 -0800, kevin360 wrote: 
> >For the main website for enblend it's suggested to still use version 4.0 
> >since there's the bug in version 4.1.  Are there any Mercurial 
> repositories 
> >of enblend that can be used that don't have the bug?  If one looks at the 
> >development tab in sourceforge there are still commits happening to 
> >enblend, so code changes are occurring.  Any repositories that could be 
> >used? 
>
> The default mercurial branch on sourceforge works well for me and is 
> apparently near to a stable release, I think this note on the 
> website is out of date. 
>
> -- 
> Bruno 
>

------=_Part_13_22094443.1352223902701
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks, just got it down, but getting some errors with it's output, will post a new thread about that.<br><br>On Monday, November 5, 2012 6:01:47 PM UTC-5, Bruno Postle wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0;margin-left: 0.8ex;border-left: 1px #ccc solid;padding-left: 1ex;">On Mon 05-Nov-2012 at 14:18 -0800, kevin360 wrote:
<br>&gt;For the main website for enblend it's suggested to still use version 4.0
<br>&gt;since there's the bug in version 4.1. &nbsp;Are there any Mercurial repositories
<br>&gt;of enblend that can be used that don't have the bug? &nbsp;If one looks at the
<br>&gt;development tab in sourceforge there are still commits happening to
<br>&gt;enblend, so code changes are occurring. &nbsp;Any repositories that could be
<br>&gt;used?
<br>
<br>The default mercurial branch on sourceforge works well for me and is 
<br>apparently near to a stable release, I think this note on the 
<br>website is out of date.
<br>
<br>-- 
<br>Bruno
<br></blockquote>
------=_Part_13_22094443.1352223902701--

------=_Part_12_18704112.1352223902701--