X-BeenThere: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.101.200.19 with SMTP id c19ls486anq.1.p; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 
	04:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.245.30 with SMTP id s30mr1065119anh.28.1261140895320;
        Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:54:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.245.30 with SMTP id s30mr1065110anh.28.1261140894918;
        Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <ke...@bluelavalamp.net>
Received: from mail-yx0-f143.google.com (mail-yx0-f143.google.com [209.85.210.143])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si354881yxe.13.2009.12.18.04.54.54;
        Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.210.143 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ke...@bluelavalamp.net) client-ip=209.85.210.143;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.210.143 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of ke...@bluelavalamp.net) smtp.mail=ke...@bluelavalamp.net
Received: by mail-yx0-f143.google.com with SMTP id 7so5760681yxe.25
        for <hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:54:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.88.7 with SMTP id q7mr300597anl.24.1261140894726; Fri, 18 
	Dec 2009 04:54:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 04:54:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <57b22edd-d558-4fea-af9c-e3228d069a78@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 66.92.173.128
References: <16ada5aa-874a-432a-bc2f-45b84f19d74f@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> 
	<57b22edd-d558-4fea-af9c-e3228d069a78@m16g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) 
	Gecko/20091107 Firefox/3.5.5,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <683976ea-572e-42c8-9822-a0ee95b02c0e@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: different fused results depending upon crop size
From: kevin <ke...@bluelavalamp.net>
To: hugin and other free panoramic software <hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Yup, that was it, the blending levels for enfuse.  Thanks for taking a
look at it and explaining it.  Now I just need to try different
settings to get the correct look.

Thanks

On Dec 18, 4:28=A0am, "bruno.postle" <brunopos...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Any output pixel produced by enblend/enfuse can be a combination of
> all input pixels from all photos if the maximum number of blending
> levels is chosen. If you have just 8 blending levels then photos 2^8
> pixels (256 pixels) beyond any frame will influence content in the
> frame.