I am saving the output mask with the --save-mask option. However the output masks have different resolution from the final composited image. Is there a way to force the output mask to have the same resolution? That would make much easier further editing.
Maybe you need to add --fine-mask to get a full resolution mask. If you don't need seam optimisation (which your other message suggests you don't) can I humbly suggest you give multiblend <http://horman.net/multiblend>a try? :) It can be much faster than Enblend and can save/load a single seam map for the whole blend. Just make sure you don't use any anti-aliasing or transparent tools when editing the seam image, and that you keep it in 256-colour indexed mode.
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:57:40 PM UTC+2, Monkey wrote:
> Maybe you need to add --fine-mask to get a full resolution mask. If you > don't need seam optimisation (which your other message suggests you don't) > can I humbly suggest you give multiblend <http://horman.net/multiblend>a > try? :) It can be much faster than Enblend and can save/load a single seam > map for the whole blend. Just make sure you don't use any anti-aliasing or > transparent tools when editing the seam image, and that you keep it in > 256-colour indexed mode.
Strange, here I got the same resolution even not using --fine-mask. I
usually make remmaped images not cropped (nona option at the Stitcher tab
in Hugin).
> The point is that I am not getting the same resolution even with
> --fine-mask. Thanks for pointing me out multiblend. Seems to suite better
> my needs.
> Thanks
> On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:57:40 PM UTC+2, Monkey wrote:
>> Maybe you need to add --fine-mask to get a full resolution mask. If you
>> don't need seam optimisation (which your other message suggests you don't)
>> can I humbly suggest you give multiblend <http://horman.net/multiblend>a
>> try? :) It can be much faster than Enblend and can save/load a single seam
>> map for the whole blend. Just make sure you don't use any anti-aliasing or
>> transparent tools when editing the seam image, and that you keep it in
>> 256-colour indexed mode.
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> hugin-ptx+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 11:25:25 PM UTC+2, Cartola wrote:
> Strange, here I got the same resolution even not using --fine-mask. I > usually make remmaped images not cropped (nona option at the Stitcher tab > in Hugin).
>> The point is that I am not getting the same resolution even with >> --fine-mask. Thanks for pointing me out multiblend. Seems to suite better >> my needs.
>> Thanks
>> On Wednesday, October 3, 2012 1:57:40 PM UTC+2, Monkey wrote:
>>> Maybe you need to add --fine-mask to get a full resolution mask. If you >>> don't need seam optimisation (which your other message suggests you don't) >>> can I humbly suggest you give multiblend <http://horman.net/multiblend>a >>> try? :) It can be much faster than Enblend and can save/load a single seam >>> map for the whole blend. Just make sure you don't use any anti-aliasing or >>> transparent tools when editing the seam image, and that you keep it in >>> 256-colour indexed mode.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. >> A list of frequently asked questions is available at: >> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ >> To post to this group, send email to hugi...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> hugin-ptx+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
