Would I be right in assuming that if you provide HUGIN with a set of fisheye images where you know the precise yaw, pitch, tilt, fov, focal length of each lens and the a, b, c, d, e individual lens parameters - you can in fact process those images without requiring control points?
Yes, you can. Technically. However, you'll need extreme accuracy in all
that mechanical data. It's not impossible to get that kind of mechanical
accuracy but it is very hard and probably harder than you think. I shoot
with a fisheye on a pano head and still require control points and fine
tuning to get acceptable results.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Andrew Baddeley <
andrew.badde...@nctechimaging.com> wrote:
> Would I be right in assuming that if you provide HUGIN with a set of
> fisheye images where you know the precise yaw, pitch, tilt, fov, focal
> length of each lens and the a, b, c, d, e individual lens parameters - you
> can in fact process those images without requiring control points?
> AB
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> hugin-ptx+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
Yes, that is how Charlie said. Imagine a panorama with 12.000 pixels wide -
a common one. Each pixel is 0.03 degrees. On the other side, if you make a
1 degree mistake when shooting it will mean a 33 pixel error, which, in my
opinion, is not acceptable.
> Yes, you can. Technically. However, you'll need extreme accuracy in all
> that mechanical data. It's not impossible to get that kind of mechanical
> accuracy but it is very hard and probably harder than you think. I shoot
> with a fisheye on a pano head and still require control points and fine
> tuning to get acceptable results.
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 1:11 AM, Andrew Baddeley <
> andrew.badde...@nctechimaging.com> wrote:
>> Would I be right in assuming that if you provide HUGIN with a set of
>> fisheye images where you know the precise yaw, pitch, tilt, fov, focal
>> length of each lens and the a, b, c, d, e individual lens parameters - you
>> can in fact process those images without requiring control points?
>> AB
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
>> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
>> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ >> To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> hugin-ptx+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> hugin-ptx+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
