Hi Cristian,
I have been having the same problem for blended, exposure fused
panos. The problem for me is more of issue for the Nadir. Here is an
example: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rueike/3658984267/
From my observations, it looks like the multiple exposures for the
Nadir are being ignored and only one image is being used to make the
final pano. I have resorted to using only the nominal shot for the
Nadir and trying to blend in post processing, but it still looks bad.
The documentation for enblend/enfuse mentions this as a limitation.
I have also tried enfusing the Nadir before stitching in hugin, but I
found mixing TIFFs from CaptureNX with TIFFs from enfuse creates some
problems. Seems like there are compatibility issues.
I have seen so many nice exposure enfused and HDR 360x180 panos out
there that there must be a work around.
Does anyone have a good work flow to avoid this issue?
Regards,
Rick
On Jul 5, 1:26 am, cri <cri.pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Today I tried to stitch 48 images with hugin (16 per exposure) to make
> an equirectangular 360x180 panorama. I discovered that I always get a
> vortex with strange fading in the zenith. Later, I read the hugin
> readme and found out that this is a known issue. So I'm here to ask
> how you handle this problem.
> (to me the only solution seems to be enfusing the single bracketed
> images before importing them in hugin for later stitching using only
> enblend).
> Regards
> Cristian
|
