Sandals, Shoes" <huaraches@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.52.77.97 with SMTP id r1mr12934799vdw.4.1327887295520;
        Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:34:55 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: huaraches@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.52.65.194 with SMTP id z2ls857408vds.5.gmail; Sun, 29 Jan 2012
 17:34:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.36.168 with SMTP id r8mr1387446vdj.9.1327887290729; Sun, 29
 Jan 2012 17:34:50 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: ls.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of
 snoxu3...@gmail.com designates internal as permitted sender)
 smtp.mail=snoxu3...@gmail.com; dkim=pass
 header...@gmail.com
Received: by m2g2000vbc.googlegroups.com with HTTP; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:34:50
 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:34:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <7fbf1f16-5271-404a-a4eb-bf32f899e8c4@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
References: <dae02b4c-ccb8-4d60-87d5-b8c62e0e987c@do4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <502589c7-735b-4868-bfed-ef4c52353f3e@c6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>
 <CAMKa24igS8wgFWOwVDaQYSfz2eVUybrYe=9=9Xfe=_NmQt02mA@mail.gmail.com>
 <27784959.164.1327700050931.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yquu38>
 <577ffea3-4d55-4ca7-80f4-e9c42c537711@s7g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <613a7897-aac3-44fc-bb83-f3b7dccd4a5d@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <097806c1-4198-4f33-acd4-e1b19885400b@t30g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <7fbf1f16-5271-404a-a4eb-bf32f899e8c4@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <f1053db8-3db2-4615-9cd4-621897f616be@m2g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: MT110 2E width, only the upper is different
From: snoxu <snoxu3...@gmail.com>
To: "Minimalist Runner - Barefoot,  Sandals, Shoes" <huaraches@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

In a nutshell there will be 2 MT110 versions. What's available now,
the more minimal version in D and 2E. Same width sole, only difference
more volume/material in the upper.

A more beefed up MT110 version, thicker, more cushioned sole. (D -
4E).
(If it happens: colossal fail IMO, and will confuse people. Have NB
run out of model numbers lol.)

I got the general idea the widths shenanigans applies to the Minimus
line.

This is my interpretation of the info I was given and take that with a
grain of salt.

Up until recently I was unaware of all this, so I don't really get why
bother with it all. If you're trying to cater to wide footed minimal
runners why not do it properly, be more informative and figure out
what people really want. I think NB are taking an approach that maybe
too conservative and little informative for their own good.

Okay that is all