Sandals, Shoes" <huaraches@googlegroups.com>
Received: by 10.50.187.132 with SMTP id fs4mr6544689igc.0.1349720029393;
        Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:13:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: huaraches@googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.197.170 with SMTP id iv10ls5923171igc.4.gmail; Mon, 08 Oct
 2012 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.8.201 with SMTP id ot9mr10219413icb.10.1349720026127;
        Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.43.8.201 with SMTP id ot9mr10219412icb.10.1349720026117;
        Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <timbutterfi...@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ge7si20119igb.0.2012.10.08.11.13.46
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of timbutterfi...@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.46 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.219.46;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of timbutterfi...@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=timbutterfi...@gmail.com; dkim=pass header...@gmail.com
Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id h16so4151746oag.19
        for <huaraches@googlegroups.com>; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:13:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=Rf3oTi0BVIGpG1C1VyrqME8VAw75VHPSveVuGLT0kSE=;
        b=HW2HSyYqGWI4HK/gcBsrB9HwL7ylbhAkBKVeBU6Zt8bmTg2eOCrpGJllScPgWuZuOf
         v+wK4XdJD98Keg+vi5x0aD+GZtPXg23hu9goFb0pka1GbJJ1NRHKnJ3x77GUVDV8HQ+D
         A+FLWYb5F5q3k107he2z94T67j5jGx7jjcvqA2l2Dvk7cklxVdh8F1GA4P9oKdYZeaEs
         /lLHAv+iVnGHa70+Wn8WijOl3Fp45EtYORZxccEWDZJIkfLPZrdlqHmviguZKNk8ENHu
         j6c15La6PRqICG7uA+dyqs8vMSktl6azwQFziTlgxeJTGwLg0fBSU/UtYGMO2NbJ63j1
         FHSg==
Received: by 10.60.32.136 with SMTP id j8mr14426985oei.0.1349720025929; Mon,
 08 Oct 2012 11:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.90.7 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Oct 2012 11:13:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMKa24iXya6-omYxft9aVhcBUFDOZgCrJM9+hbfp88EyRwO...@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e7eafd63-dcef-4f37-ac2f-ef855bc9b187@googlegroups.com>
 <CAHtuXAmCc=VA-R1FkR5ARpBtKe-dxr8VP_zZ=71sJwLsHdr...@mail.gmail.com> <CAMKa24iXya6-omYxft9aVhcBUFDOZgCrJM9+hbfp88EyRwO...@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Butterfield <timbutterfi...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 13:13:24 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHtuXAk9QHPn27Xg872g6612P5mQSG6fG8pQG65zBFB_g16...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Minimalist Runner:123454] Minimalist Shoe recommendations for
 Chicago winter?
To: huaraches@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Tuck <tuck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll second the NB line, but the warmer models will be less minimalist.

If running through snow that covers your shoes (It's fun to run at
night when it's snowing), having some sort of gaiter to keep the snow
out will help prevent it from melting and cooling your feet.  The new
NB Winter 110 will have it built in.

http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-gear/gear-of-the-show/Winter-110.html

Tim