http://htmlpurifier.org/comparison is 2 years old about htmlLawed.
How does it compare to html Purifier now ?
Regards,
Jacques — www.pyrat.net
Good question! I will note that htmLawed was last updated on February 26, 2009,
so it's not *that* out of date :-) (no, it is kind of out of date)
From a cursory glance, it looks like the exploits I posted about are fixed
if you toggle safe to be 1. (The default for safe is still 0). Iframes are now
disallowed; forms are still allowed. The blockquote standards compliance issue
is fixed; but you can still hoodwink it into outputting non standards-compliant code.
I will admit that I'm less of a pain-in-the-butt about standards compliance these
days. It's nice to have, but in reality, the code surrounding the HTML Purifier
content is probably not standard's compliant, so "what's the point" eh?
Now I'll be off to update the comparison page.
Cheers,
Edward